@raphjd said:
@blablarg18
None of the Canadian churches accused of killing kids has been found to have any graves, as claimed.
I'd say that most church burnings in Canada are related to the lies about the churches murdering millions of kids, especially 1st nation kids.
Oddly, the UK turned the religious kids' homes into brothels. Cyril Smith (MP) & Jimmy Savile (TV personality) are 2 of the most famous ones to have free rein to diddle the kids.
This was by no means a catholic thing, but a widespread thing with kids' homes.
Some of it has to do with the treatment of natives, but the natives tend to protest things in very different ways than the usual "Italian Magic" method we've been seeing.
On the note of those graves, the only hard evidence that has ever surfaced is ground penetrating radar that was taken to the areas where these alleged graves were said to exist, where they have found and documented anomalies in the content and composition of the ground in some places, but nothing was ever proven beyond that.
This includes a small number of these alleged grave sites having been ripped apart in search of any hard evidence of WHY there was an anomaly found there in the first place, only to turn up empty handed. Literally ZERO actual evidence of any grave sites has ever surfaced, so after only a few schools were officially dug up, the project of trying to unearth the alleged graves was finally scrapped due to a lack of evidence.
It should also be noted that an anomaly in the ground contents can be caused by any number of things, including if the landscape was changed by human action, rather than by natural forces, including having built a previous structure on the ground, only to fill in where it once stood at a later date, or even from the presence of something hidden underground, which wasn't all that uncommon in the days of prohibition. Such anomalies can also occur when the layout of the ground is changed during the construction process of a structure (such as the school), which even today is not uncommon. It is actually quite common (even to this day) to reshape the surface of the landscape by leveling out the ground in the surrounding area of the structure for a more visually appealing or otherwise more practical layout. Dips or holes get filled in, or in some cases, areas where the ground is raised will get flattened out to make a level surface. All of these things will change the consistency of the soil, which would produce the very kind of anomalies that were found.
The problem with this kind of thing is that more than 100 years ago, record keeping was not exactly as detailed as it is today, if it was even documented at all... So the only thing that can be proven by those ground penetrating radar searches that were done is that there are areas where the content and composition of the ground is not evenly consistent with the rest of the area, though nothing has ever come to light to prove one way or another WHY the contents of the ground are not uniform in some areas.
