@sybarite Ive had the same issue. Have you found a solution / different torrent client?

@eobox91103 Also not an official for the site, but IMHO, if you had a torrent that was removed (unregistered torrent error), I would avoid attempting to re-publish the exact same torrent again. As you don't know why it was removed, submitting the exact same torrent might raise alarm bells... Instead, I would recommend creating a "collection" of 2 or more similar files and re-uploading them TOGETHER. That makes for a new torrent, if not new files. Also, in case it was removed for being a duplicate, so long as your collection isn't a duplicate of someone else's collection, you don't get removed for THAT cause. (If it has something else wrong with it - like it's kiddie porn, or something banned like that - don't submit it at all, naturally!)

@WikiDude said in Uploading new vs. reseeding old: @williexyecoc said in Uploading new vs. reseeding old: @williexyecoc oh yea also, have fun talking to ruben + liam + alex- AND their lawyers they actualy have money for as well very soon PCEEE OUT!!!!! New account - someone pissed off either The Administrator or The Site Owner LOL I'm impressed... they each have a LOT of patience & tolerance. Well done, Karen! BTW: Impress the fuck outta me - tell me the ZIP CODE I live in.... (Hint: it's not a 5-digit code! LOL)

@bi4smooth I just noticed the RSS Feed link on the search page, where it has been sitting right under my nose for years! It now makes perfect sense HOW someone would be able to automatically download new torrents in a particular category, and I've been on this planet (and the internet) long enough to have stopped asking WHY people do such things. Thank you for enlightening me!

@lololulu19 Camera noise. In the past 10 years camera sensors have skyrocketed in terms of noise. I would say mainly thanks to Sony (lead technology). But because of mobile demand (lead consumer/"user"). When I mean noise I mean higher sensitivity, bla bla. Thus, even theater movies from the late '10 look noisy compared to nowadays crisp and noise-free tv-shows recorded in the past 18-24 months. Past production chain: "Low quality" native resolution source sensor --> "low quality" lossy codec for production (4:2:0) --> poor reencoding low bitrate (MPEG2, QT, whatever). --> CRT displays /Early LCD (usually low res, low dpi) Current production chain: "High quality" high resolution source sensor --> "high quality" lossy or almost lossless codec in production (4:4:4 or 4:2:2) --> Video Downsizing (even more noise reduction) --> high quality reencoding with higher bitrate (H264, H265, VP9, AV1) --> IPS/OLED displays (higher res, higuer dpi) So: Porn was usually recorded in poor light conditions and/or not top of the notch cameras. Access to professional grade or even cinematographic grade cameras and production process has reduced 100 times (maybe more) in the past 20 years. The average consumer display has 6-20 times the pixels, 4-10 times the contrast, and 3-5 times the colour gamut compared to the DVD era. There you have it.

sorry, off topic, who's the guy in your avatar and where was it pls