@andergarcia

Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment

Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life

People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...

OK, so lets get down to "brass tacks" here:

• Regardless of whether they are legally valid in a court (and that would likely be different depending on which court it was heard in), the Site Owner has told content owners that he will take down posts here that infringe on their ownership rights.
• The Site Owner wants to avoid running afoul of the law - especially the idea that this site exists primarily to facilitate illegal sharing. As a precaution, the Site Owner has given content owners wide leeway, and has prohibited the discussion of avoiding, invaliding, or otherwise getting around the protections that he (the Site Owner) believes exist under the DMCA
• the opinion of the site owner is the only opinion that matters here - and it is his opinion that this topic is not allowed on his system

Please understand that:

• this is not your site - you are but a guest here
• your continued pursuit of this topic may well get your account suspended - you have been directed to the warnings already
• you are free to start your own site if you disagree (this isn't the Politics section, but much as Trump has done with Trump Social after being banned by Facebook & Twitter), but you have no "rights" here - we area all just guests on someone else's site!

@raphjd
You assume I'm a Democrat.
You are again a finalist in the "Miss Taken" pageant! We'll try to get you another sash, but we're running low.

I'm a conservative, I'm just not a conspiracy-confused one.
I believe in science: facts don't lie, but people who interpret them often do.
I believe in Democracy (even when i lose).
I believe in the general goodness of the average person.
I believe that Joe Biden won the recent election fair and square.

I do not believe that nationalism works in anyone's best interests.
I do not believe in racism - especially as a political tool.
I do not believe in absolutes.
I do not believe in secret cabals of child molesting politicians, threatening our children - primarily because they belong to the other party.

I personally know very fine politicians of both political parties here in the US. Honorable men and women who do not agree (not with me, and certainly not with each other), and yet, remain friends.

To my misguided (sometimes mis-labeled) Conservative friends who believe whole-heartedly that Donald Trump is their savior, I say this: Repent of your sins now, before your God judges you!

I also offer this: count the letters - compromise is not a 4-letter word!

@nhuixnhuix

Excellent question.

MY PERSONAL definition of a twink is a lithe (skinny), smooth body, likely a little smaller than average, and often moderately to more effeminate.

MY PERSONAL definition doesn't include age...

I LOVE TWINKS OF ALL AGES!

@raphjd said in Scotland officially bans free speech:

@homppeliboy

Is that all there is to your argument?

BTW, did you join the site just so you could post that crap? I mean, you post that 2 minutes after you joined the site.

EDIT: You have been a member for many years, but you just made your first ever post.

LOL - what can you say, @raphjd , your bombastic "every match lit is a raging forest-fire" style of commentary just motivates people to join in!

Welcome to the forums @homppeliboy - PLEASE continue to post your thoughts (and reactions)... whether you agree with @raphjd on something or not!

@raphjd said in The truth about liberal media:

You get no argument from me that unwarranted attacks on Asian Americans are being under-reported... by ALL media in the US, liberal and conservative... but, uh, who are these people attacking Asians - accusing them of purposefully spreading (or creating) COVID-19?

In a word: Trumpites - admittedly not mainstream Trumpite Politicians, but idiots who hear "kung flu" from "He who Must Be Named" and think that all Asians are culpable for COVID-19...

Your topic heading is about LIBERAL media - and in this instance, conservative media is just as guilty

Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

@raphjd said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

@bi4smooth said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

Once again, you are name-calling to defend liberal authoritarianism.

No - I am not excusing Trudeau's overreach - I've called it out here before.

But was his overreach worse than Trump's (albeit in other areas) or Biden's (in the SAME area)??? NO!

The point wasn't whether Trudeau overstepped his authority in Canadian law and society - it's that he's not comparable to Putin and what he's doing now!

In very many (scarily many) ways, Putin's behavior here mirror's Hitlers when he invaded Poland, and just before he invaded Norway and Belgium. (Esp in the excuses he's giving for doing so...)

As a free world, we can stand up against this kind of thing - and sacrifice lives now - or, we can cater and cowtow to them and lose everything later. The choice is up to our leaders.

In 50 years, will Putin be the "Great Father" or the "Reviled Dictator"? Personally, I'd rather it be "forgotten footnote", but that'd require a very VERY skilled sniper!

Just to add my 2-cents worth - I had this happen to me once, and it turned out that the older torrent, by the time it was looked at, was essentially dead: no seeders and no leechers. So they deleted the ORIGINAL, which made my duplicate report "invalid" (according to the explanation I was given).

@lololulu19 said in Main torrent image being replaced by other users on uploads:

@ricky Having uploaded 76,000,000,000,000 (76 TB) of stuff, I'm not worried about 1 seedpoint. It is frustrating to see the images I uploaded get shoved to the back.

If it is your upload, you can edit the torrent listing and remove the offending pics.. that said, if they are legit pics of your upload, you should be judicious in doing so... but you can ALSO then re-upload the "main" pic you want seen.

I'm a WASP (White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant), so Lasagne is the "comfort food" we have for loss (just had a HUGE pan for my father's wake).

No, I'm not "really" protestant - but I was RAISED protestant. I don't "practice" any religion right now. Topic for another discussion thread

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=000ba8e6b33e6aca681f4eac5fac1b90bcd01ee7ae572a14

@frostycab
I know what you mean - I recently ditched several studios that I just don't enjoy anymore... I am "limited" to my 32TB storage array... I was at 29TB and didn't want to invest in new disks... I'm back down to 25TB in use...

I also run all of my videos thru Handbrake - I recode them to .x265 (aka h265) and limit to 720p as well (who wants to see the stubble on that pretty boy's ass??? Let me revel in the fantasy that it's as smooth as silk! ) But, that limits what I can reseed to essentially my own torrents... which I need to upload more of. (Side effect: all of my re-coded videos no longer match the signatures used to detect piracy - no match makes it MUCH harder for them to prove I have their content!)

I use a self-managed seedbox (though, for the life of me, I haven't been able to get RSS feeds to work off of this site under qBitTorrent on Linux) for this and 3 other torrent sites I subscribe to (not all porn: my 32TB porn array has a brother... another 32TB array for non-porn... enough movies & TV shows to last well into my retirement!)

@mcondor
Your underpowered porn-PC is a site problem?

I'm pretty sure the site owner isn't changing code to add/remove the snowflakes - rather, they are programmed to start in Dec and last thru March. My point being: buckle up buttercup - they'll most likely be back, and last thru March AGAIN in 2027!

@dargard-0 said in 2 years of uploader activity deleted by inadequate moderation:

Yes you did your job briliantly, you did solve a "problem" well and you did not harm the community of this formerly russian gay torrent site. And yeah I am a drama queen, for sure

Not that I have a dog in this fight, but I want to be clear - as a 20 year member of this site (as-of this year! - Y'all even REMEMBER 2016?), the original site being gaytor.rent was NOT because it was housed in Russia - rather because registering a site with "gay" in the name wasn't allowed by many TLDs (Top-Level-Domains), and the .ru was not only accepting, but also CHEAP!

YOU pay the overhead costs for a site this size - esp with security needed (DOS and DDOS attacks against a GAY site? never!).

If improvements to the site are something you want, consider making a (or better, more than 1) contribution! This site may be free to you, but it's not free to run it!

Also, even tho they make mistakes, and overreact, and under-react, and otherwise breathe - as-if they were human - I'm very grateful to the staff that runs this site! They are both overpaid and underpaid: they volunteer (or so I'm told)! Without them, this place would be a useless morass of unformatted & unrecognisable data!

I personally would support REMOVING the special rules for negative filtering for str8, bi, & scat content....

If there is content on the site you don't want to see, there are ALREADY filters on the browse and search pages - learn to use them.

Yes, I realize that those are "inclusion" filters, and not "exclusion" filters, so if your "offensive" str8 is also tagged "Asian" and you are searching for Asian content, you'll still get the Str8 entry... oh the humanity!)

Besides, as far as I can tell, those filters (for Str8, Bi, & Scat) don't always work anyway. I'm told they only apply to the first category. Thus, I would support the idea of making that filtering in the browsing or search pages an "exclusion" list, or creating a separate list for exclusions - but it should apply (as the positive filter does) to all of the listed categories, not just the first one.

That said, I think the Mods have plenty to do already, and changing code to "shield the sensitive eyes" of some noisy users probably isn't high on the priority list.

IMHO, if you are "offended" by the sight of a vagina, you probably don't belong to the "adult" category to begin with. (To be clear: If I never see another vagina in my life, I will not miss it. But I should encounter one (sexually), I won't run screaming from the room!)

Finally, the same arguments are being made (in some cases by the same people) about AI generated porn. IMHO, it won't be too long before that AI porn is indistinguishable (in expert creators' hands) from the real thing...

100% in support of this - there should NEVER have been any confusion:

Trans women (MTF) benefit from male genetics - even if they undergo gender "affirming" surgery (that is: even if their balls are cut-off!) - that is PATENTLY unfair to biological women. That it was allowed for 1 week, much less several years, is just unfair and, in my mind, unreasonable.

Mind you, I have no objection to trans women in the ladies bathroom - I'm under no illusion that women are going into the bathroom to show off their vaginas (or penises) to each other... its just a bathroom, and the idea of a 2nd one for women is a "first world problem". 99% of women's restrooms in the 1st world have individual stalls that give each person a significant level of privacy. (99% of women's restrooms OUTSIDE the 1st world are just holes in the ground and are already shared with men ).

That said, I draw the line when it comes to locker-rooms - where people are undressing & bathing. If you've HAD the surgery, and can pass for a female (albeit with surgical scarring) - when totally naked, then we can talk... but if you've still got a penis, you do not (perhaps yet) have the right to be in a women's locker-room. If you're trans and are uncomfortable in the "other" lockerroom, please ask for separate accommodations (usually, 1 or more coach's offices are in the same locations).

COMMON SENSE if you ask me!

@chuckBKK said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

@bi4smooth The offender and the content are connected, which is why I do not treat the continued circulation of his work as some neutral matter.

Whether he personally profits from downloads on this site is beside the point for me. The platform still chooses to host and distribute the material, and users are entitled to object to that on ethical grounds.

Let's differentiate here - you can find the content objectionable - AND you can say so in this forum - AND people can agree or disagree with what YOU find objectionable...

But let's not lose sight of the fact that virtually ALL of the content (gay sex) on this site is "morally objectionable" to a significant portion of society - larger in some areas, smaller in others, but significant in ALL areas!

Suggesting that his material be banned is one thing.
Insisting upon it is another.

Hey there! I wanted to say THANKS for pointing out this studio! They went down for a while, but I'm glad to see they're back!

This isn't a studio I'll download and keep ALL of their content (like Corbin Fisher LOL), but I'm definitely going to see if I can find these on other sites!

If I find some, I'll post here - and I might try uploading just to test the "DMCA" suspicions here... (another reason there might not be any of their content is that there just aren't any uploaders who subscribe! There's a TON of porn from sites I never see here on my HD!

Thanks again!

@chuckBKK said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

@bi4smooth said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

Corollary: When a priest is convicted of molesting an alter-boy, is the entire congregation supposed to drop the Catholic Faith in response? Were his sermons LESS valuable because of his crimes? If you're Catholic, were his absolutions in the confessional rescinded because he sinned? If so, were they rescinded when he committed his crimes, or only after his conviction?

While I agree with part of what you are saying, I do not think the priest example is equivalent.

It would be a leap to demand that an entire congregation abandon its faith because of one man’s crimes. The individual offender, however, must be held accountable and lose the position, access, and authority that made harm possible in the first place.

In your example, the priest should be defrocked, should never again be placed in a pastoral role, and should not be put in proximity to minors or other vulnerable young people. That is the relevant parallel for me. The consequences should remain with the offender instead of being imposed on every believer around him.

I think you've actually reinforced my point. It IS (IMHO) ridiculous to say that his parishioners deserve any punishment (including invalidating any of his works not associated with his crimes) - that was exactly my point! (I'm sorry my sarcasm wasn't more obvious LOL).

But shouldn't the same be true of Austin Wolf's legal content? To my mind, his legal works should not be removed solely because of his extracurricular crimes... heinous as they may be. (And lets not kid ourselves: Austin Wolf is NOT profiting from having his videos downloaded on this site! LOL)