@OKCancel said in Removed torrents:
Even Onlyfans content can be within DMCA net.
Hang on! Nobody reply until I've been and made some popcorn and had a wee. I don't want to miss the "PoRnOgRaPhY CaNnOt Be CoPyRiGhTeD bEcAuSe It Is ObScEnE!!!" farce that I sense coming over the horizon. 
@andre00-0 Gonna need more info I think
@makigott Not wanting to sound rude or unsympathetic, but shouting in all caps on the forum like this probably isn't the best way to resolve this.
Looking at your link, it looks like the upload has been temporarily removed from the site while it gets reviewed to make sure everyone in it is of legal age. This is something I personally 100% approve of as it protects not only the site itself but also all the members.
If you want to try and get a productive response may I suggest that you write politely to the helpdesk to ask what happens next?
@lawyer72us said in boy massaging his ass:
baileykirkwall
So this guy? Thanks
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=18c3333dfb90e73031aab4170a5875fb4d586c6a817aa3cf&hit=1
What have I started??? At this rate I'm going to have to start asking all these SB companies for kickbacks! LOL
Just a couple of things to remember:
Use the SB primarily for high-demand torrents, whether you want them personally or not. If you're grabbing something for yourself but there's little demand from other peers then you're better off downloading it directly and using the SB space for more popular files.
Keep track of when your SB subscription ends and plan accordingly. If you have loads of stuff on there that you want to keep then make sure you allow yourself enough time to FTP it all to your local storage..
Interesting to see some boxes still working once you've passed your traffic limit. Might be worth a look at the terms and conditions to see exactly what they say and whether there's a second limit that cuts off completely or if the throttle you or whatever. I must admit that know just how much traffic you can generate I would only ever get a box with unlimited traffic.
I came across this too. I don't know if it's up to date or accurate, but some of you might find it useful if you choose to try:
@OKCancel-0 Blonde one looks like Sven Basquiat. You can check his scene pairings here which might tell you who the other guy is: https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/id=d871ab8f-cf74-47a6-b421-5203fc1d11f7
@frostygrin I think you might have things a bit mixed up, though I'm willing to listen if you think I'm wrong about the following....
The buffer is how much you can download before you reach your own minimum ratio, which is never higher than 0.8.
Your total download on the site is used to set your Base Daily Limit for downloads. You also get extra download slots which are calculated by multiplying that BDL by how far you are above your minimum ratio. By the time you've downloaded more than 800Gb from the site your BDL is already 100, plus your extras for the ratio bonus, plus extras if you've uploaded in the past.... I doubt there are many people downloading that many torrents each and every day, even with a seedbox.
What I was trying to say is that a seedbox is a great tool for fixing a poor ratio, and for giving yourself breathing room, but people shouldn't feel like they need to chase ridiculously high ratios just for the sake of it. It's better to put yourself in a good position, and then if you have things that you want to seed then you can still seed them without the use of a seedbox, and saving some money in the process.
@promotion-0 I can make something up if you like, but it's not going to help....
Just looked at the site and there are no torrents showing up in any of the search pages for me. Nothing on "Search", "Search (Old)", or "Browse". I can still see That there are well over 300K torrents on the site with the page jump links, but there are no results on the page. This only seems to be happening if I have just a few categories selected to include in the search. If I don't filter at all I get everything, and if I select nearly all categories it seems to work too. I've tried various combinations to see if I can narrow down the exact conditions causing this with no luck.
My first thought was "What if balloon animals did porn?"
I hope someone know where these scenes come from!
I hope people get into the habit of posting a pic or 2 to save everyone else from needing to go to external links, verify their age, change VPN locations etc. A small amount of effort by one person saves a lot more for everyone else. Not having a go at you per se, just a general annoyance as so few people actually do this.
@ikpooo Just a little tip for you:
If your client gives you an "unregistered torrent" error, as long as you've already connected to the swarm (and the seeder keeps it active) I think you can still download it. New people won't be able to join the swarm, but those already in it can stay connected to each other.
@ninesquare Been using it for about a year know. Very good little tool for organising your collection. It's a godsend when it comes to checking to see if I already have something that somebody uploads here though. I often think "I'm sure I've seen that before," and it only takes a couple of seconds with a quick search to confirm if I have it, compared to getting Windows Explorer to search through thousands of files on several drives.
Well, maybe not "little" as such. My library (which I admit I haven't cleaned the duplicates and deleted files out of for a while) currently contains roughly 75000 videos, and with the associated thumbnails, scrubber sprites and all that the Stash data folder is currently standing at a little over 300Gb. It took a few days to scan through everything and create all the previews and such when I first ran it, but as long as you run the scan function on a regular basis it shouldn't take more than a few minutes even if you've grabbed a fair bit.
The video player is a little bit troublesome sometimes, as it struggles with a few videos I have that play perfectly well in VLC, though there aren't too many of those. The player could also do with a few more keybinds for skipping through a video as some of the jumps are a bit long, but I can live with that.
I've been playing around with getting some of the automatic functions to work but not had much luck. What I was hoping to do was run the renamer plugin to modify my files so that they'd include the title, studio and date of production, but I can't seem to get it to work. If you have any luck then please do let me know what you did.
One of the best features is the ability to grab info for a video. I've been through a lot of mine and managed to download the proper titles, tags, descriptions, performers, studios, dates... You definitely need to take some time to do this properly as you can get a lot of erroneous results for some videos, but the result is well worth it.
I also like the ability to group individual scenes together as they appear on the DVDs. It means I can get rid of a lot of files where I had the whole DVD but then discovered all the scenes as separate files in my library too. Now they can play in the same sequence as the DVD, but I can still treat each scene individually too.
@lololulu19 If any studio is particularly on-point regarding DMCA infractions, there is no reason to expect them to be any less proactive regarding their older productions than they are their newer scenes.
In the case of this studio, I have noticed a real trend of them releasing "new" films/DVDs that are simply compilations of some of their old scenes. Indeed, they seem to be one of the worst studios for do so. I have seen the same scenes crop up in multiple ostensibly new films. This, to me, seems like a huge "fuck you" to those people who still purchase films rather than simply subscribe to their site as they are charging premium prices for something the customer may already have paid for. It's not unlike those wretched trading card packs for kids that are sold in newsagents. The kids end up just getting the same cards over and over again with nothing new.
Nevertheless, the studios financial interest in those scenes still exists, and as such there is no reason to expect that they will simply turn a blind eye to sharing of scenes they may have shot a decade ago. Also, while I agree that recent work isn't as good as it used to be, I don't see why that should have any bearing on their approach to DMCA breaches.
@raphjd May I suggest that the information available on the main site be amended to reflect the current situation as I believe at could be the source of the confusion? Looking that the trade-in page for points it clearly states:
For what I get points?
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
What I don't get is why completely straight stuff is here.
Because sometimes a gay man can enjoy watching a straight guy even if they have to crane their neck to see around the tits
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
EVEN THEN, I don't mind if the guy is extremely cute (which is quite rare).
So in effect you are saying that all straight content should be removed/banned except straight content that you personally enjoy. I don't think that's going to work unless you want everyone to send you their files before they upload them to the site.
I check this and other sites daily, and can safely say that even on a good day 98% of what gets uploaded is of no interest to me whatsoever, but I do recognise that obviously there are others that like it. Who do you think is uploading the straight content? I can't imagine anyone thinks to themselves "Yeah, I'm totally straight and have no interest in gay porn or men, but I think I'll join a gay torrent site and upload stuff that nobody there will want, because that'll be a productive use of my time."
I get what you're saying. I truly do, but at the same time this isn't a site just for you or me or any other single user. It's for everyone.
Yep. My impression is that over the years files get moved around between so many different people on various sites that it's like a huge game of Chinese Whispers, and eventually you end up with files with names that bear nothing in common with their release titles.
Like I said, the idea is most definitely NOT to find a way around uploading duplicates. I'm becoming quite adept at recognising random uploads here that I've seen before and report them if I can verify that they're dupes. I just thing that if people can take a couple of minutes to research their uploads and name them properly before adding them to the site it would go some way to making things better for all users, even as the file propagates through other sites later on. Its so frustrating to see relatively new scenes uploaded with random titles when the real information is so easy to find.
@whiteDwarf-0 Personally I avoid those files like the plague. The very fact that they used to be on the banned lists of several torrent sites has embedded itself in my brain, and even if he himself is older now you have to ask yourself if their other performers are above board given past suspicions. I do find myself wondering the same thing about quite a few OF performers, but given that sites like OF and JFF have age verification policies in place I would hope that everything you see on those sites is compliant with the law.
It does make you wonder though about how culpable an individual might be if they were to be found with questionable files downloaded from one of those sites. Could you, for example say that as the site has policies in place to ensure that all performers are of legal age you should not be held accountable? Clearly it is impossible for viewers to check a performer's ID, so should there be something akin to the UK's "Challenge 25" policy? (For the foreigners here, the Challenge 25 policy is meant to prevent underage people from buying alcohol. It means staff should check IDs for anyone who looks like they might be under 25, saving a lot of problems at the till when 18 or 19 year olds used to get offended at being asked for ID.) Of course, such a move would completely eliminate all twink porn.
It's an interesting question, probably much debated in the past when Brent Corrigan's real age was discovered after shooting some scenes for Cobra. After all, how is a viewer meant to know if someone is 17 or 18? You would think that should the police decide to try to get a conviction the onus would be on them to prove the performer was underage. When you hear in the news about underage pornography I think we all associate it with children who could never be mistaken for an adult, but it becomes much harder to discern the legality of the issue when talking about performers at the 18+ threshold.
@lololulu19 said in DMCA strikes and the 90-day suspension:
if there is no USA copyright, then there is no copyright.
Wow....
(Sorry about the late response, but I had to nip down to the doctor. He told me I'd strained my eyes by rolling them too hard. )
