@Minerboh80 I’m really glad I could help you. I’m a bit insecure by nature, and my English isn’t very good, so I was worried that I might not express myself clearly enough for you to understand. Anyway, just like I said, I’m truly happy to have been able to help you out.

@cp2000 can you send some links my way or sites where I could find more? I've already seen most of the popular ones that are torrents on this site. Like the tiktokers, baits101, fenix, troyplays, nichgasm

@MrMazda said: Pretty much every forum I have ever seen has been at least viewable without needing to login To be fair, that's because, for pretty much every forum, if you can see them, you don't need to log in. [image: 1775693379582-dd7bc9ad-4d25-4076-843a-278cbd4d6480-image.jpeg] Plenty of sites also have 'registered only' sections, so you might see a 'welcome' page or 'about us' page (think old phpBB) but the majority of the content is behind the login. And with discord, I'm aware of quite a few sites that function like a forum but require a private invite and all the content is hidden. Honestly both approaches are reasonable, but it's weird to ignore that many porn-related sites are private access, not accessible to Google.

@MrMazda Thanks, however I saw @john32123666 's note about the 6 day 'rule' and have managed to sort it myself. Many thanks for offering to delete them for me though!

@bi4smooth said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?: But let's not lose sight of the fact that virtually ALL of the content (gay sex) on this site is "morally objectionable" to a significant portion of society - larger in some areas, smaller in others, but significant in ALL areas! Consensual adult gay content being considered objectionable by some people is a very different issue from raising ethical concerns about material associated with someone convicted of crimes involving minors. In much of the Western world, public morality has moved on from treating gay sexuality itself as inherently suspect. A criminal conviction of this kind is a different matter entirely. For me, it speaks directly to conduct and character, and it is a legitimate reason to view the person and his work differently. That is the distinction I am making, and I will leave it there.

@ianfontinell-0 Cool. Thanks for confirmation. I was franticly trying to find the setting for my timezone, but couldn't find it. All good. Thanks.