@Douseikekkon said in About the size of pictures: maybe a low-res screen capture? [320x240] is acceptable for low resolution/[pixels], and any resize image ... Those are picture thumb preview and not consider pictures, from the torrent in question ... When you save a html complete page or html text only it includes on a save folder from the browser w/ picture thumb in it ... There are many free screen captures tools extension from any browsers ... The only problem, these guys are too lazy and incompetent from doing it right ...

Quite strangely, the day after my first message, my upload speed came back to normal (~ 500 Mb/s) and remained such till today. I've waited 3 days before experimenting to freeleech anything; I chose to freeleech a rather small torrent today. At the very moment I did that, my upload speed fell again at <1Mb/s!!! (I've checked on www.speedtest.net and some other similar sites.) I'm left with two hypotheses: — my ISP is delivering an instable upload trafic when I freeleech something (3rd time in a row…); — there's an obscure unexpected interaction between gaytor.rent & my fiber box (the speed of transfers between the computer and the box, using FTP, doesn't seem to be affected)… 🤯

@john32123666 You wrote: “It should only works if both torrent has a seeder.” Actually the rules say otherwise. [image: 1665111249963-capturfiles_158.png] It is enough that the original torrent has seeders; which was the case. As a matter of fact, some hours after this conversation the duplicate was removed (thanks to MrMazda).

@Douseikekkon I wonder how you got to the conclusion that that's how you compare duplicates.

@lololulu19 Well… I have one fiber box and an ethernet cable between it and the mac. Among other experiments, I followed a procedure which makes use of an .opvn file to configure the box. Nothing worked. [image: 1650219877133-freebox.png] I have received today an answer (in French) from Nord, which says: « NordVPN n'offre actuellement pas de fonctionnalité de port-forwarding pour des raisons de sécurité, mais nous discutons activement de la possibilité de l'inclure ultérieurement dans la configuration de notre serveur. » Roughly : “NordVPN does not currently offer port-forwarding functionality, for the sake of security, but we are actively considering its inclusion in our server's configuration in the future.” According to the mail I should be refunded within 10 days… P. S.: I'd included in my mail this image of Transmission preferences, with all ports obstinately shut by NordVPN. [image: 1650219440131-capturfiles_178.png]

@Douseikekkon: Bon, eh bien je me réponds à moi-même, au cas où cela aurait son utilité pour un autre utilisateur de FREE. Il faut aller dans la console de gestion de la freebox : Paramètres de la Freebox > Gestion des ports > Ajouter une redirection. Puis voir les copies d'écran jointes. Merci, j'ai eu le même problème.  :cheers:

@chia: search for ss108 from your link and click on the result. awesome workaround btw  :funny2: Right.  A Google search often returns results for torrents that are no longer available on the site because Google caches pages on their own systems for faster search results.

I can summarize the problem in one simple term….. DDoS.... That said, we should be good to go now.

Big ooooops! And sorry for the inconvenience :sorry: The cause for my trouble was that I had Javascript deactivated for some test on another site and I just forgot to set it back again.

From what I understand, the files are resized by the system. Please upload only BIG Pictures in GOOD quality! (many file types supported like .bmp .psd .jpg .tif etc. Uploaded Files will be automatically resized by the System.)

@Popper: C'est un torrent qui était poussé à la top du liste (triée par défaut par date), par le changement du date "Added" (ajouté). OK, mais comment doit-on faire pour qu'un « vieux » torrent remonte et apparaisse au sommet de la liste du PictureBrower ? Quelle action doit-on effectuer ? Est-ce que n'importe quel utilisateur peut choisir de faire remonter un ancien torrent, ou bien seulement l'“uploader” initial ?

Selon un commentaire de mod dans un autre thread, le Totaltraffic correspond au nombre de fois le torrent a été " snatched " multiplié par la taille des fichiers.  Cela dit, le compte des snatch ne semble pas être très fiable, étant parfois des centaines des fois plus grand que le nombre des clients en réalité. Quant aux chiffres dans l'image : en bas, au moins, le compte et bon.  Mais pour les 49,76 Go, et ben, là je peux pas expliquer.