@Joker This is off-topic as far as the original point of the post, but as it has moved into a wider discussion of duplicates, I thought it worth raising to see if it's an angle worth thinking about now - if ever - if the governing rules are being updated:
Now and then I come across a scene that just has a really "bad" title: e.g. "White twink fucked hard by BBC". Maybe the uploader genuinely didn't know the proper details, or was trying a sneaky duplicate.
After downloading, I realize it's actually "Staxus - Monster Cock Island - Devon Lebron & David Hanson". If this torrent already exists, it's a no-brainer - the badly titled one is removed as a duplicate and balance is restored to the world. But if it's uploaded afterwards, technically it's a duplicate so should be the one to be removed. However, this latter one will be far easier to find for anyone looking, and it's not reasonable to expect the second uploader to have identified the first before uploading.
Should both remain, or one be deleted? If one should, which stays? My vote would be for the one that is titled correctly, even if it comes later. If nothing else, this would encourage uploaders to use use a scene's proper information. If the second has to be the one to go, is there a way the title of the first could be corrected so that it shows up in searches, etc.? Otherwise it's a reasonable expectation that it's going to keep being uploaded again by people, after searching for the scene and finding that - to all intents and purposes - it's not already here.
I appreciate that this gets as messy as file sizes and file types, but thought it worth adding to the mix to at leasy consider, even if the conclusion is "too complicated, leave well alone!"
