@raphjd said in This Is Such Bullsh*t:
Your beloved RINOs and swamp monsters wanted to cancel Trump from the very start.
I'll take this example of "what about-ism" as acquiescence to the validity of my earlier point...
However, there are legitimate reasons, from time to time, when politicians should be removed... though it should be rare.
But let's be honest: Conservative Republicans were the first to use impeachment as a political weapon - against Clinton: for the high crime of having an extra-marital affair with a White House intern and lying about it!
Let's review history:
- Johnson was impeached for firing a Secretary of War the other party wanted to keep
- Clinton was impeached for lying about sex in the White House
- Trump was impeached for covering up an attempt to get a foreign leader to interfere with US elections (two things there!)
- Trump was later impeached for Inciting a riot for the purposes of insurrection against the US Government
Of ALL of these things, the Clinton impeachment stands alone in the pages of history as frivolous political nonsense... and it is we Republicans who are to blame for using impeachment for such base, purely political, means... it has (predictably) back-fired on us!
Do I, personally, think Trump should have been removed from office in the FIRST impeachment? No - not really, but he should have "gotten a bigger scare" - MORE Republicans should have voted to remove him, and the vote should have been CLOSE, but not enough to remove him.
Do I, personally, think Trump should have been removed from office (and barred from future office) in the SECOND impeachment: HELL YES!!
Given the precedent the (WE) Republicans have now created, President Biden can, in January 2025, LITERALLY ARREST sufficient members of Congress on January 5th - enough necessary to override the Electoral College's count, throw the election into the House (and Senate), and GUARANTEE that his replacement (assuming is isn't him) is a member of his own Party - as chosen by the remaining MoC... and there isn't SHIT Congress can do about it because he'll be out of office by the time they can try him in the Senate!
The idea that one can resign or otherwise leave office to avoid impeachment is an anathema to the concept as a whole (which comes from British Law!).
One of our Founding Fathers, John Quincy Adams, ca. 1832 - AFTER his term as President - proclaimed on the floor of the House that: “I hold myself, so long as I have the breath of life in my body, amenable to impeachment by this House for everything I did during the time I held any public office.”
Yes, Virginia, there IS impeachment after you have left office!
... and this new precedent is wrong: historically, politically, and logically.
I just pray that, like the "impeachment as a political weapon" has, bite us in the ass a few years down the road!

We have great beaches in Spain where you can practice nudism.
)

