Reporting Duplicates
-
There is the torrent "XPERIMENT Vol.01 - KENDO BOY" and the torrent "XPERIMENT volume one". The contents is identical (the same pictures of the same size, resolution and format type). However, "XPERIMENT volume one" is arranged as a single RAR file while "XPERIMENT Vol.01 - KENDO BOY" (which is younger) is the subdirectory with pictures. I reported that these are the duplicates (however, no reply yet). Is it really true that the packing/repacking of the files creates new torrent which is formally different in its format?
-
There is the torrent "XPERIMENT Vol.01 - KENDO BOY" and the torrent "XPERIMENT volume one". The contents is identical (the same pictures of the same size, resolution and format type). However, "XPERIMENT volume one" is arranged as a single RAR file while "XPERIMENT Vol.01 - KENDO BOY" (which is younger) is the subdirectory with pictures. I reported that these are the duplicates (however, no reply yet). Is it really true that the packing/repacking of the files creates new torrent which is formally different in its format?
The thing is, when you extract the .rar file (we allowed that for images, magazines and cartoons except for videos), the file size of that torrent is still the same, so it's more than 10% difference, i.e. not a dupe
-
I'm a touch confused. I seem to recall from an earlier post that merely adding pictures along with a previosuly-uploaded video does NOT make it a new upload. In other words, adding pictures makes no difference. The +/- 10% rule applies to the video file, not the collection of files as a whole.
Or at least that's what I understood from the Forum previously. Have I been wrong all this time?
What is the official rule here? Could a GTRU staff member please clarify?
Thanks.
-
Now I'm super confused. Kalayaan, in your reply above today, you seem to indicate that if the entire collection of video, pics, etc is +/- 10% the upload is not a dupliacte, even if the video file is the same (I don't know how to use the quote function - sorry).
"The thing is, when you extract the .rar file (we allowed that for images, magazines and cartoons except for videos), the file size of that torrent is still the same, so it's more than 10% difference, i.e. not a dupe"
But in another thread titles "Bundling" yesterday you wrote:
"I've discussed this with one of our global mod and the answer is Yes, the pictures in the file is irrelevant.
We based our dupe on the file size (exact size or <10%difference) and file format."If I'm understand both posts correctly, there's a contradiction here.
Help! I'm blond and from Los Anegels! I need things explained super simple and clear! ;D
-
@ben351500 I am replying to 2 different queries, the first one involve vid with pics as against video only (The Bundling topic post)
The second one (this topic post) both contains images only with rar as against jpg/png breakdown pictures. No Video included in the last question regarding Xperiment which is a magazine
-
@kayalaan: Aha! Now I understand! The Xpirement was a kinda/sorta red herring, in that there is no video file. Thanks mucho for explaining.
So my question from Jan 7 still stands - whether a new upload of the same file but with pictures (zipped or not) is a duplicate (with the poivisio that it isn't grouped together with other files of course).
-
@kayalaan: Aha! Now I understand! The Xpirement was a kinda/sorta red herring, in that there is no video file. Thanks mucho for explaining.
So my question from Jan 7 still stands - whether a new upload of the same file but with pictures (zipped or not) is a duplicate (with the poivisio that it isn't grouped together with other files of course).
I already replied to that
https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=33497.msg317852#msg317852 -
I thought your answer was about same file, but collected together with other files.
My question is about the same file, but with a set of pics along with it. One pic included in the torrent, or 100 pics; is it a duplicate if the video is that same?
I aplogize for being obtuse, but I can't seem to get a simple yes or no answer, and I see what I think is contradictory information in the forums, etc.
-
Okay to make it simple, your example, yes it's a dupe, and by now the dupe has been removed
-
Thank you, but that doesn't answer the question as to what the rule on this is. I would like to know so that I don't go reporting files as dupe when they are not - it wastes everyone's time, and I'm sure y'all would like to get fewer false resports.
-
Dupe removal will be based on the format and size (exact or <10% difference) of the video, accompanying pictures (zip, .rar, png, jpeg, bmp etc) are irrelevant)
-
Thank you. I'm sorry to be so persistant. And thank you too for your patience with me. You guys do a lot of good work - as volunteers - on this site, and I for one appreciate it very much.
-
Here's something I hadn't noticed before. Today someone posted a couple of torrents that contain two files; both files have been previously uploaded, but the thing is that both files are of the same film/scene (not two different scenes, which are a collection and therefore not duplicates). It seems to me to be a gray area; not strictly duplication, but not really a collection either. What do folks think - are these collections or duplicatets? I give the two files below:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=74748574188b07031c723d1e2447d4a87cbe37d0cd05a5bd
and
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=56ba96ba30e600651c723d1e2447d4a81d2927918e43726d
-
Here's something I hadn't noticed before. Today someone posted a couple of torrents that contain two files; both files have been previously uploaded, but the thing is that both files are of the same film/scene (not two different scenes, which are a collection and therefore not duplicates). It seems to me to be a gray area; not strictly duplication, but not really a collection either. What do folks think - are these collections or duplicatets? I give the two files below:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=74748574188b07031c723d1e2447d4a87cbe37d0cd05a5bd
and
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=56ba96ba30e600651c723d1e2447d4a81d2927918e43726d
No, it's not. Uploader simply upload same scene but different byte size
-
Hello.
I ask the question here as I don't want loose ability to report duplicates by false report.
Is it a duplicate when one file is uploaded BUT the same file + another file have already been posted a few weeks ago ?
I mean is this considered as part of a themed collection ?Exemple :
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=c43dbe96888675b79f3bc8062191efae3e60becaffe6243e is the original 7 weeks ago
"Kayser Magnum latino boy jerking off"
Kayser Magnum.mp4 1.41 GB
Kayser cums over.mp4 455.46 MBand
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=f310f728c5e25b4d9f3bc8062191efae1164f4b3e2d240a7 posted 1 day ago
"LatinoGuysPorn - Kayser Magnum"
Kayser Magnum.mp4 1.41 GBThanks.
-
@junior thanks!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login