@lordgosford [image: 1783821255467-159.jpg]

@roygbivosu Thanks a lot for the info. I’d never seen a video of him. Still hunting for more stuff. I know he had some really solid photo sets, and I’m not sure if there are any other videos. I’m getting the feeling my tastes are pretty expensive though — studios probably have to pay a ton to get better content with these guys because of what they charge.

@ianfontinell said: @Auryk torrent here: KO EAST – ノンケ潜入捜査官 – KEA030 You solved it! Thanks, @ianfontinell ! I've been trying to get this ID'd on another forum for a few days now =). Appreciate the help =P.

@miaw13 said: some with Mathieu Dor, Hugo Algt & VVS Thanks a lot

@roygbivosu THANK YOU so much!!!

@ianfontinell said: @thedude99 unfortunately the issue you're describing is not solvable, this is by design of the bittorrent protocol. In the initial implementation of bittorrent, torrent pieces have a fixed size, multiple files can overlap in a same piece, and the most common outcome of this is that the beginning of a file will share the same piece as the end of the previous file. You cannot partially seed a piece, you need the whole thing. If the filr you're trying to seed overlaps with another file, you need to have that part of the other file. Even if you never downloaded that file in the first place, the torrent client will still have downloaded it and stored it in a special folder or file. After you remove that torrent from your client and getting rid of that special file, any attempt to seed this file will lead to the client trying to download the remaining bytes of that torrent piece. There's nothing that I or you could do about this, sadly. The only solution to this is to stop using v1 protocol to create torrent files, but after the torrent file is created, we can't do a thing. What that means for your particular case is that, if you're the only person reseeding, no one will ever be able to finish it, and the only solution is for you to create a brand new torrent with the files you have. That's unfortunate. This v1 protocol has been in use for like 25 years? I wish they would move on to v2 already. Thanks for the explanation.

@roygbivosu ty!

@ianfontinell thanks

@ianfontinell many thanks for the help,he is so hot and handsome.

@Seakyusee1 This is usually the case when your torrent client is trying to download the torrent, rather than seed it. To fix this, remove the torrent from your uTorrent, then do the following: Move the video file or the folder containing the multiple files into the folder that your uTorrent downloads into by default. Download the .torrent file from the site to use Open the .torrent file from the site with your uTorrent As long as all the file(s) are in the correct place (ie the default download folder, or their collective folder within that folder), uTorrent should check the contents, then begin to seed it for you. When it tries to download the contents, it is because it cannot find them in the default download folder, so it assumes you are trying to download, rather than seed.

@ianfontinell This man sucking dick looks nice, I really like these men being my toys

@ianfontinell Thank you!

@roygbivosu said: Body to Die For Thank you very much!

i dont have an account so i dont know how to help u guys

@hubrys Chat-GPT is smarter than u. & not even alive [q] con ed of new york. are they state-established monopoly? not in sense where state literally owns their shares but in sense where state guarantees their position as sole provider of something and tells them what they can, can't or should do. answer in less than 40 words. [a - attempt 1] Con Ed is given exclusive service territory rights by New York and the state’s Public Service Commission heavily regulates its rates and operating obligations. That means it’s a regulated geographic monopoly. [a - attempt 2] Yes—Con Edison is a state-regulated, service-territory delivery monopoly in practice: New York’s PSC grants it the franchise to be the default wires/steam utility and sets the rules and rates, with limited competition within that territory. [q] to be clear: New York's legal regime intervenes to stop competitors for Con Ed and give it special, exclusive privilege in geographic areas? say yes or no, whichever is closest. [a] Yes. New York’s PSC authorizes utilities like Con Edison to serve defined geographic “service territories” as the default regulated delivery provider, while limiting meaningful competition within those areas. ok? STATE-DIRECTED, STATE-PROTECTED MONOPOLY, genius This fits what I told @xyzzy141 earlier: Reality of a big government. Those private actors who might be capable, DARE NOT MOVE or to do anything quickly or good. Only "connected" (politically) and incompetent private actors are granted crumbs. But u say blaming starvation for obesity ok, I got u to 1. defend communism, at least by implication or comparison to what you falsely claim is "capitalism", and yet, 2. admit it's starvation. Thanks for playing! gg

@trkr4life There may be other ways too, here is one way (assuming you are eligible to invite)... from the torrent site (not forum), click on your username that appears towards top right screen, left of "Support" link. Choose Details & Stats and there you should find details of how many invites you can send and link to send invites. P.S. This "may" differ based on operating system, regional setting etc.

great cock

so hot if you find more of him please share

Anyone still using uTorrent 2.2.1, you really must make sure that net.discoverable option is False and webui is disabled as these have sever security issues

@MaleMan said: So sorry for bumping this, but the site seemingly has introduced another setting that seems to break the current settings and resorts to always sorting by relevance regardless of settings : [image: 1783779627896-b1e0f69b-1888-41cd-9e7e-404013713b76-image.jpeg] The default was Smart (Relevance when searching, Newest otherwise). I've changed mine to Newest first, but search does not keep this setting. Going to homepage and doing a search : [image: 1783780300175-e275d2dd-4d43-4bea-98be-fcfd749ec243-image-resized.jpeg] still results in results being sorted by relevance, and this despite changing the sort order of the results to Newest first and having activated the "Don't auto-switch to Relevance when I search". [image: 1783779751845-ecafa707-d9b8-44b8-b51d-ba48996a4776-image-resized.jpeg] It's very frustrating. Why does this site keep wanting to sort by relevance? Can the owners correct this? That is a known bug, ever since the search bar was introduced in the home page, it always resorts to relevance sort regardless of your preferences. But in the proper search page your settings should work as expected.