US State Department says there are only 2 genders
-
They could have referenced "people".
-
TLDR; is this post just @raphjd, again, being ironically trans-supportive, to highlight what a transphobic ass he really is?
-
Ah, so liberal hypocrisy on trans people is being pro-trans.
The funny thing is, I have been far more supportive to trans people than liberals have.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
Ah, so liberal hypocrisy on trans people is being pro-trans.
The funny thing is, I have been far more supportive to trans people than liberals have.
Just like Trump was the "Greatest President in all of history for Black People, except for Lincoln, no, maybe even better than him!"
Just because you CLAIM something over and over and over (ad nauseum), does not - EVER - make it come true!
-
You are the clear transphobe, since you deny that men can have periods and get pregnant.
All you liberals make excuses when your own violate your own trans dogma, but screech and bleat when conservatives disagree with your bullshit.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
You are the clear transphobe, since you deny that men can have periods and get pregnant.
All you liberals make excuses when your own violate your own trans dogma, but screech and bleat when conservatives disagree with your bullshit.
Men cannot get pregnant... Trens-men can.
Men do not have periods... Trans-men can.Here you are, back to your Humpty Dumpty mode:
What other people write means exactly what you say it does, nothing more, and nothing less.You need a class in the English Language.
The word "men" can have many meanings... some are specific, some are generalized, and in English, sometimes "men" means "all people"... and sometimes, "men" means cis-gendered adult males.You know, even Russians get this right... only you seem to have a problem with the concept... I guess you're just a poor student! Which explains why you were exiled from Mother Russia and posted in your little back-water village...
So now, Humpty Dumpty, please regail us with your twisted logic about how trans-supportive you are... indeed, how you are the MOST trans-supportive person in Scotland, no - in the UK, no, in all of Europe, maybe even the WORLD! Maybe even the Universe! Yeah! That's the ticket!
-
But trans-men ARE men unless you are a transphobe who is "othering" them.
As a liberal, you should know all of this.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
But trans-men ARE men unless you are a transphobe who is "othering" them.
As a liberal, you should know all of this.
I see - so the fact that the term "men" can sometimes include trans-men and other times not is hard fro you to understand...
I understand... that's a difficult subject to wrap your hands around. Indeed, I can see now why the Governor of our Great State of Florida wanted to keep the topic away from 8-year-olds! He must know you!
-
Ah, so you, a diehard leftist, view trans-men as men when it suits your agenda.
Any exclusion of trans-men from "men" is transphobic, except to the lunatic left who make up the rules (for any topic) to suit their agenda.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
Ah, so you, a diehard leftist, view trans-men as men when it suits your agenda.
Any exclusion of trans-men from "men" is transphobic, except to the lunatic left who make up the rules (for any topic) to suit their agenda.
Thank you, Humpty-Dumpty, for your explanation of the entire English Language!
As was pointed out, and you now have confirmed:
YOU: @raphjd, Lord of the English Language, keeper of all dictionaries, thesauruses, and other reference manuals, Lord, Emperor of the Internet have decreed:
Henceforth, all use of the term "men" shall include trans-men, but not intersex men, and only cig-gendered men when they're not colseted trand-women, and not anyone under age 18, unless emancipated by a court...
Clear and simple!
-
You are such a troll.
-
@raphjd Well you are trolling yourself with this thread. The US state department hasn't said, what you are saying, you are just thinking it, because you have an agenda all the time.
-
Are you saying that they didn't tweet what I quoted?
Or, if you admit they did tweet it, then they only acknowledge men and women.
I think you are making excuses for them.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
Are you saying that they didn't tweet what I quoted?
Or, if you admit they did tweet it, then they only acknowledge men and women.
I think you are making excuses for them.
No, he's saying the Gov't made a generalized statement that covered over 98% of the population - and because it was not talking about gender, it failed to specifically include any of the 66 other recognized terms than can be used to describe human gender identity.
They did not do so to be exclusionary - only you have done that.
BTW: If you ask sociologists, they would tell you that "men and women" covers 99.3% of the population - but I personally think that trans and other gender non-conforming people are under-reported, so I expanded it - claiming only 98% of the population...
Just to be perfectly clear, up-front, and honest about it...
-
So when liberals get butt hurt about "forgetting" the other genders, their issue is what exactly?
It seems that you people are intentionally flip-flopping on the topic (all topics, actually) so you can demonize conservatives.
We all know that if I made that tweet, you lunatics would be pissed because I didn't include every TikTok gender.
-
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
So when liberals get butt hurt about "forgetting" the other genders, their issue is what exactly?
It seems that you people are intentionally flip-flopping on the topic (all topics, actually) so you can demonize conservatives.
We all know that if I made that tweet, you lunatics would be pissed because I didn't include every TikTok gender.
I know it shocks you to the core every time I say this, but I don't speak for other people! That's your specialty!
I have no idea what goes through the minds of Liberals when they make stupid comments. Indeed, I have no more insight into their insanity than I have into yours!
I don't explain other people's thoughts, I challenge them.
My people, for the record, are mostly conservative, and mostly Republican (though several of my friends have announced their departure from the party, preferring to re-register as independent or libertarian).
I don't demonize people. I generally try to understand them (as I did you, at first). The ones who genuinely believe differently from me, I greatly respect - and often have wonderfully deep conversations with. But, the ones who can do no more than spout / repeat others' words without being able to explain or provide further insight into them... well, I think this forum has shown, I have little patience or tolerance for them. They don't even KNOW what they believe, they only know what they're told to believe, and they generally have no curiosity or desire to know why... only to be "right."
One of the hallmarks of the "thought follower syndrome" I detest is the insistence that any argument against them is completely and totally against them in every way... like your insistence that my Republican Values are closer to Democrat views or are Chinese influenced. Solely because I dislike using falsehoods, fear, uncertainty, doubt, and outright lies to prove a political point.
Nuance is lost on you. "You're either with us 100%, or you're against us, 100%" is your modus operandi...and it's how I successfully lampoon you so often here!
It's been a fun hobby for a while now, but you've become even MORE extreme - and, as this post shows as an example, I don't really need to poke fun at your stuff anymore, because it's so far out there that you are a caricature simply by posting it!
-
Ok, dearie, if you are that deluded, I won't bother with you anymore.
You and your liberal buddies keep proving me right
-
@raphjd Yes you didn't quoted, what they wrote. You added to the quote, and make assumptions about their motive without having any idea about their motive. It is YOUR agenda that you are promoting, not theirs.
-
You are a liar.
It's part of the tweet.
Fucking hell, you idiot leftists are so full of shit.
-
Since you made your bullshit claim, tell me where in this tweet where I ADDED to the quote.
There's enough detail for you to go back and look for yourself if you don't trust this picture.
I'll wait while you make up some bullshit excuses why you lied.
When you reply, if you have the courage, all I want to hear is your explanation for your lie about me altering the quoted tweet.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login