LOL, you are such a clown, Mrs Chop Suey Joe.

Actually, I have never called you a transphobe - that was someone else. What I've said - repeatedly - is that your MASSIVE overreaction to being called one may be your attempt to reconcile your own feelings over the matter.

I do not believe that failing to mention trans people when in topics unrelated to sexuality or gender is phobic at all... there is no requirement for trans-supportive people to keep trans issue front-of-mind at all times!

But you demonize me at all costs and on all fronts - and I'm not offended. IMHO, your views are extreme and foreign bad-actor influenced, so being distanced from them is a PLUS in my view!

You an idiot and an ass clown, and most of all a troll.

I was called a transphobe, by you and the other idiotic left because I don't count trans trenders as real trans, while you don't count trans-men as men.

You're such a tool... mostly of the Russians, but of other extremist views as well.

Arguing with you about these things is like arguing to a Nazi that fascism is bad, or arguing with a Christian that Mary couldn't have been a virgin, or arguing with Trump that he lost in 2020...

All worthless arguments because the other participants will not listen to reason or logic, and will not accept the existence of facts that do not support their views.

To wit: what's the point?

As I've pointed out already: this argument has already been won - the State Department made no claims about gender, they simply wished members of the Armed Services well on a special day set aside for that.

They used a common English idiom that is intended to be inclusive (and is: in its intention, use, and accepted meaning). Even with @raphjd's "literalist" interpretation, their well wishes covered 99.7% of people serving in the US military today.

@raphjd, having been accused of being transphobic himself, now sees transphobia everywhere - and seeks to actively point it out EVERYWHERE - likely so as to normalize his own feelings.

I'm going to let him DO that now... maybe it will soothe him, but his claims are so outlandish and childish, no one, save for himself, takes him seriously, so it's not worth my time to pursue this any further.

As to my claiming to be smarter? By not subscribing to your "religion," I am not smarter or less smart than you - I just don't believe in the same set of unbelievable (IMHO delusional) beliefs as you. My arguing with you over your "voodoo" evangelism is no different than a Christian evangelist trying to persuade his peers NOT to fall for the tricks of a Haitian VooDoo Priest!

I left the tweet untouched in the quote. I added nothing unless you can point to the exact point where I included "only" in the quote.

Maybe you are referring to the thread title.

Would you be happy if I said "US State Department ignores the extreme vast majority of genders, including Cakes and countless others"?

I do find it comical how you people claim to be loving and tolerant, but despite the trans community saying exclusion is denial of existence, you will deny their existence by defending the Biden administration excluding them. Deying their existence is a hate crime.

@raphjd You added "only", and that gives it a whole new meaning.

So you admit that I did not edit the tweet, as you claimed. How kind.

++++

As for your other claim, we can dispute that.

As the wokest administration in US history, who loves to play all the liberal identity BS, you would think they would know that there are not 2 genders, but infinite genders.

MedicineNet.com lists 72 other genders, besides male and female.

HealthLine.com lists 68 other genders, besides male and female.

Uloop.com lists 7 other genders, besides male and female.

Tracy Marsh, PhD, Walden University's Clinical Psychology department head says there are 9 other genders, besides male and female.

TheBurningPlatform.com lists 112 genders with 71 suffixes. According to the article, you can combine multiple suffixes and multiple genders to suit your needs/wants.

Oddly, the 20 or so sites I looked at didn't include Cake Gender.

Some of the articles are a couple of years old, so that might explain why there are so few genders listed.

Don't act so superior.

You have extreme TDS and little more.

You actively refuse to look at anything that doesn't blatantly support your world view.

In the video where Tucker proved that the 51 intel twats lied to the American people about Russian collusion in the media, but said the opposite, you actively refused to look at it because you know best, so much so that you will ignore their comments in the media versus their sworn testimony in Shifty Schiff's secret hearing in the bunker.

Likewise with the Steven Crowder used the Wayne County, Michigan official electoral rolls to prove voter fraud, you actively refused to watch it because you know better than the election officials and their official documents.

You never, ever have honest conversations. You are nothing but a twat who believes that you are superior to everyone who disagrees with you.

You are a typical liberal due to the way you screech and bleat that those who disagree with you are every IST and PHOBE, when in fact you are guilty of that very thing.

You pretend to be ultra liberal, but in fact you are no better than the garbage you pretend to hate. You believe trans-women are women when it suits your agenda, but will claim that trans-men aen't men when it suits your agenda.

Your agenda is always rooted in your extreme TDS.

That's all there is to you, a victim of your own extreme TDS.

Since you made your bullshit claim, tell me where in this tweet where I ADDED to the quote.

There's enough detail for you to go back and look for yourself if you don't trust this picture.

I'll wait while you make up some bullshit excuses why you lied.

When you reply, if you have the courage, all I want to hear is your explanation for your lie about me altering the quoted tweet.

You are a liar.

It's part of the tweet.

Fucking hell, you idiot leftists are so full of shit.

Ok, dearie, if you are that deluded, I won't bother with you anymore.

You and your liberal buddies keep proving me right

@bi4smooth

So when liberals get butt hurt about "forgetting" the other genders, their issue is what exactly?

It seems that you people are intentionally flip-flopping on the topic (all topics, actually) so you can demonize conservatives.

We all know that if I made that tweet, you lunatics would be pissed because I didn't include every TikTok gender.

I know it shocks you to the core every time I say this, but I don't speak for other people! That's your specialty!

I have no idea what goes through the minds of Liberals when they make stupid comments. Indeed, I have no more insight into their insanity than I have into yours!

I don't explain other people's thoughts, I challenge them.

My people, for the record, are mostly conservative, and mostly Republican (though several of my friends have announced their departure from the party, preferring to re-register as independent or libertarian).

I don't demonize people. I generally try to understand them (as I did you, at first). The ones who genuinely believe differently from me, I greatly respect - and often have wonderfully deep conversations with. But, the ones who can do no more than spout / repeat others' words without being able to explain or provide further insight into them... well, I think this forum has shown, I have little patience or tolerance for them. They don't even KNOW what they believe, they only know what they're told to believe, and they generally have no curiosity or desire to know why... only to be "right."

One of the hallmarks of the "thought follower syndrome" I detest is the insistence that any argument against them is completely and totally against them in every way... like your insistence that my Republican Values are closer to Democrat views or are Chinese influenced. Solely because I dislike using falsehoods, fear, uncertainty, doubt, and outright lies to prove a political point.

Nuance is lost on you. "You're either with us 100%, or you're against us, 100%" is your modus operandi...and it's how I successfully lampoon you so often here!

It's been a fun hobby for a while now, but you've become even MORE extreme - and, as this post shows as an example, I don't really need to poke fun at your stuff anymore, because it's so far out there that you are a caricature simply by posting it!

So when liberals get butt hurt about "forgetting" the other genders, their issue is what exactly?

It seems that you people are intentionally flip-flopping on the topic (all topics, actually) so you can demonize conservatives.

We all know that if I made that tweet, you lunatics would be pissed because I didn't include every TikTok gender.

@serenity

Are you saying that they didn't tweet what I quoted?

Or, if you admit they did tweet it, then they only acknowledge men and women.

I think you are making excuses for them.

No, he's saying the Gov't made a generalized statement that covered over 98% of the population - and because it was not talking about gender, it failed to specifically include any of the 66 other recognized terms than can be used to describe human gender identity.

They did not do so to be exclusionary - only you have done that.

BTW: If you ask sociologists, they would tell you that "men and women" covers 99.3% of the population - but I personally think that trans and other gender non-conforming people are under-reported, so I expanded it - claiming only 98% of the population...

Just to be perfectly clear, up-front, and honest about it...

Are you saying that they didn't tweet what I quoted?

Or, if you admit they did tweet it, then they only acknowledge men and women.

I think you are making excuses for them.

You are such a troll.

@bi4smooth

Ah, so you, a diehard leftist, view trans-men as men when it suits your agenda.

Any exclusion of trans-men from "men" is transphobic, except to the lunatic left who make up the rules (for any topic) to suit their agenda.

Thank you, Humpty-Dumpty, for your explanation of the entire English Language!

As was pointed out, and you now have confirmed:

YOU: @raphjd, Lord of the English Language, keeper of all dictionaries, thesauruses, and other reference manuals, Lord, Emperor of the Internet have decreed:

Henceforth, all use of the term "men" shall include trans-men, but not intersex men, and only cig-gendered men when they're not colseted trand-women, and not anyone under age 18, unless emancipated by a court...

Clear and simple!

Ah, so you, a diehard leftist, view trans-men as men when it suits your agenda.

Any exclusion of trans-men from "men" is transphobic, except to the lunatic left who make up the rules (for any topic) to suit their agenda.

@bi4smooth

But trans-men ARE men unless you are a transphobe who is "othering" them.

As a liberal, you should know all of this.

I see - so the fact that the term "men" can sometimes include trans-men and other times not is hard fro you to understand...

I understand... that's a difficult subject to wrap your hands around. Indeed, I can see now why the Governor of our Great State of Florida wanted to keep the topic away from 8-year-olds! He must know you!

But trans-men ARE men unless you are a transphobe who is "othering" them.

As a liberal, you should know all of this.

@bi4smooth

You are the clear transphobe, since you deny that men can have periods and get pregnant.

All you liberals make excuses when your own violate your own trans dogma, but screech and bleat when conservatives disagree with your bullshit.

Men cannot get pregnant... Trens-men can.
Men do not have periods... Trans-men can.

Here you are, back to your Humpty Dumpty mode:
What other people write means exactly what you say it does, nothing more, and nothing less.

You need a class in the English Language.
The word "men" can have many meanings... some are specific, some are generalized, and in English, sometimes "men" means "all people"... and sometimes, "men" means cis-gendered adult males.

You know, even Russians get this right... only you seem to have a problem with the concept... I guess you're just a poor student! Which explains why you were exiled from Mother Russia and posted in your little back-water village...

So now, Humpty Dumpty, please regail us with your twisted logic about how trans-supportive you are... indeed, how you are the MOST trans-supportive person in Scotland, no - in the UK, no, in all of Europe, maybe even the WORLD! Maybe even the Universe! Yeah! That's the ticket!