Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
AH, so you don't believe in equality.
Your fellow liberals support cancel culture, but you (all you liberals) are against calls for liberals to get a dose of their own medicine.
A guy that raised over $4mil because of a viral video has destroyed you liberals had to go hunting for something to ruin him. You dug up a post he made when he was 14, that's more than a decade old.
Yeah, let's protect a black guy who has a history of making racist and anti-semtic posts on his blog.
Anyone got a straw man? I need a straw man!
-
I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.
I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.
I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.
Protected? no, punished!
Have I mistakenly assumed you can read English?
-
You keep telling yourself that.
I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
You keep telling yourself that.
I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.
Thanks again for telling me about my beliefs - I believe you don't have an actual argument to make, so you choose instead to attack me (mainly by calling me names)...
So you know, I do NOT believe in "EQUAL" rights - because that (at least at this time in our cultural history) is am impossible goal: the wealthy have extra rights (and the wealthier the more the "extras")...
But this isn't about rights, it's about PUNISHMENT.
And I don't believe in (nay, I OBJECT TO) cancel culture, plus I DO believe in redemption. I also believe in equitable (not equal!) justice... so punish, not cancel.
I would end by calling you a hypocrite.. but I don't want to stoop to your level (and I want to spare you the Google search)
-
Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.
Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.
Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.
No, indeed - I strongly implied that you were borderline illiterate - sorry if you missed it.
I have objected to cancel culture many times - but perhaps the first time you've heard it from me was in response to your stated desire to cancel this guy.
I believe that, if you look back several months, you went on a rant against cancel culture in general (because Trumpites - I think it was Mike Lindell) were in it's crosshairs... and I posted that it was a rare-instance of us agreeing on something!
Funny how you support "canceling" some, but not others... that's hypocritical
-
Sure, you have objected to cancel culture. I agree that you have.
The difference is that you remain silent when Repubs are canceled, but defend liberal supporters of cancel culture when they are caught in their own shit and conservatives call for them to get a dose of their own medicine.
Normally, I am against cancel culture, but when an advocate of it gets caught, like the guy in this thread, he deserves to get a dose of his own medicine. A simple concept that is obviously too difficult for fake conservatives to understand.
-
@bi4smooth You don't believe in equal rights?... Well I don't go off what I believe. I try to focus on what I know.
-
@manhandler said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
@bi4smooth You don't believe in equal rights?... Well I don't go off what I believe. I try to focus on what I know.
I also don't believe in fairies, leprechauns, or sasquach.
But on a more serious note, you're misinterpreting things (as you have so often - for your own agenda)... "Equal Rights" is a laudable, if impossible goal. As I clearly explained when I first wrote it.
More equitable rights is achievable, equal rights is not.
I'll repeat it again, as you appear incapable of understanding:
Progress, not perfection.
-
@bi4smooth Oh, "Progress." Using democrat party terms and claiming to be Republican. Judge Joe Brown, a conservative black tv judge, said, "We're working on it." That describes it perfectly. There's no need to over-exaggerate. You're stating that equal rights is impossible to achieve. It's not. You're basically stating that civilization is impossible.
-
@manhandler said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
@bi4smooth Oh, "Progress." Using democrat party terms and claiming to be Republican. Judge Joe Brown, a conservative black tv judge, said, "We're working on it." That describes it perfectly. There's no need to over-exaggerate. You're stating that equal rights is impossible to achieve. It's not. You're basically stating that civilization is impossible.
ROFL - your grasp of the English Language is wholly underwhelming...
Progress (in this case) is not even related to "Progressive" - the phrase is used to to acknowledge that perfection is not possible, but coming closer to the goal - in a repetitive, iterative process allows you to make inroads towards improvements - even if perfection is not possible.
There is absolutely no way that "Equal Rights" can possibly be achieved from each person's perspective. For every 1000 people, there are at least 1001 different ideas as to what "Equal Rights" would mean.
Civilization is not impossible... but a perfect civilization is...
I am sorry you have such a hard time with English. Perhaps if you'd paid better attention in school, or read material more challenging than the 5th-Grade readers... alas, that ship has passed...
-
@bi4smooth Oh, please. Like I never read a dictionary before. You want to play a little word game. You're talking to the master. Progress (in this case) IS related to Progressive. In fact those two words are very very similar. Gaslighting or ignorance. Take your pick.
-
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Equity, not Equality
Absolute proof you are a liberal.
I am a realist! The belief that absolute equality is possible is, in fact, a LIBERAL one!
More proof that you're the fake conservative, wrapping himself in a Trump blanket...
-
@bi4smooth said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Equity, not Equality
Absolute proof you are a liberal.
I am a realist! The belief that absolute equality is possible is, in fact, a LIBERAL one!
More proof that you're the fake conservative, wrapping himself in a Trump blanket...
You are the one spouting off about Equity.
That is basic liberal dogma.
-
I'm sorry - but you're rotten-in-the-head.
Spouting off about "equality" - a "pie-in-the-sky", egalitarian, utopian "ideal" as-if it were possible (who would be the arbiter of what is equal? What's equal to you wouldn't be so equal to others...) is textbook liberal!
-
I think you are describing Special Rights, under the guise of equality.
Your type of "conservatives" said that marriage equality is where everyone is equal in their ability to marry a person of the opposite sex.
Me on the other hand, I say marriage equality is being able to marry the person you are attracted to and love.
Equality is NOT what Honest Joe and Camel Toe are doing by being racist toward whites. You voted for anti-white racism.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
I think you are describing Special Rights, under the guise of equality.
Your type of "conservatives" said that marriage equality is where everyone is equal in their ability to marry a person of the opposite sex.
Me on the other hand, I say marriage equality is being able to marry the person you are attracted to and love.
Equality is NOT what Honest Joe and Camel Toe are doing by being racist toward whites. You voted for anti-white racism.
You continually claim I voted for Biden because I agreed with his politics.
I repeatedly describe how that's not true.Same shit, same bucket.
Empty it yourself this time... I'm tired of typing the same replies over and over.BTW: I've never mentioned it before, but your reference to Kamala Harris as "camel toe" is offensive to women - and to anyone who cares about treating other humans with even a sliver of respect. I may not agree with her Politics, but she is the VP of the country, and 1 heartbeat away from being the 47th President of the US. Call her dishonest, call her Hubris Harris... but camel toe (referring to her genitalia) is offensive.
-
Why are you sharing your views here and not on reddit or Quora where you will get actual challeges to your posts. You probably copy things from their and post as you here. This is why i guess i havent come into the forum much. I assumed it was going to be a lot more sex talk and stuff that people like. Have fun with your anger
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login