She was chosen, and they pointed it out to the world, because of her vag and skin color. She is a token and it was admitted to the entire world. Biden was not going to have the best person to be VP, but the best non-white vag to be VP.

Quayle was an extreme idiot.

Being an idiot is not comparable to being a total fucking liar and absolute piece of shit.

Even if we exclude the fact that she is a total lying whore in the Willie Brown situation, she is still an extremely vile person.

She lied about "fwee-dom", bussing, Kwanza, and countless other things to boost her racial creds. She even stole the "fwee-dom" story from the MLK,Jr interview in Playboy, then called people racists for questioning her about it.

She lied about getting high to hip-hop that didn't exist at the time while being extremely heavy-handed as AG over petty drug offenses.

As AG, she hid evidence that would prove people were innocent.

She believed the sexual allegations against Biden until he picked her as VP. Now those women are liars.

@bi4smooth

Well, you do love to defend the liberal dogma.

Ah, Camel Toe the Ho is every woman. (queue the Whitney Houston song) She is a whore, as she slept with a married man, Willie Brown, the then Mayor of San Francisco, to get what she wanted. Are you saying that makes her every woman too?

Also, let's not forget that you said we aren't supposed to think about the running mate, so why did you point out she could become the new President?

She's VP because of her vagina and her color, not because she is qualified.

She is VP because Biden chose her. Most historians agree that VP candidates aren't nearly as important in the late 20th and early 21st Centuries as they were even 60 years ago.

You think Dan Quayle was qualified to be President? But he could have been! 1 heartbeat away, for 4 long years!

I look forward to the time when Trumpism is dead and you go back to being just another anarchist...

Well, you do love to defend the liberal dogma.

Ah, Camel Toe the Ho is every woman. (queue the Whitney Houston song) She is a whore, as she slept with a married man, Willie Brown, the then Mayor of San Francisco, to get what she wanted. Are you saying that makes her every woman too?

Also, let's not forget that you said we aren't supposed to think about the running mate, so why did you point out she could become the new President?

She's VP because of her vagina and her color, not because she is qualified.

Who are you talking to?

I rarely use Reddit and I quit Quora because, as a moderator there told me, they don't care if you say something factual, if it upsets someone, that's a bannable offense.

Ah, so you won't come to the forum because every section isn't about fucking. You sound like a 1-dimensional person, but that's for sharing. I'm sure you can find a site that you enjoy.

@bi4smooth

I think you are describing Special Rights, under the guise of equality.

Your type of "conservatives" said that marriage equality is where everyone is equal in their ability to marry a person of the opposite sex.

Me on the other hand, I say marriage equality is being able to marry the person you are attracted to and love.

Equality is NOT what Honest Joe and Camel Toe are doing by being racist toward whites. You voted for anti-white racism.

You continually claim I voted for Biden because I agreed with his politics.
I repeatedly describe how that's not true.

Same shit, same bucket.
Empty it yourself this time... I'm tired of typing the same replies over and over.

BTW: I've never mentioned it before, but your reference to Kamala Harris as "camel toe" is offensive to women - and to anyone who cares about treating other humans with even a sliver of respect. I may not agree with her Politics, but she is the VP of the country, and 1 heartbeat away from being the 47th President of the US. Call her dishonest, call her Hubris Harris... but camel toe (referring to her genitalia) is offensive.

I think you are describing Special Rights, under the guise of equality.

Your type of "conservatives" said that marriage equality is where everyone is equal in their ability to marry a person of the opposite sex.

Me on the other hand, I say marriage equality is being able to marry the person you are attracted to and love.

Equality is NOT what Honest Joe and Camel Toe are doing by being racist toward whites. You voted for anti-white racism.

I'm sorry - but you're rotten-in-the-head.

Spouting off about "equality" - a "pie-in-the-sky", egalitarian, utopian "ideal" as-if it were possible (who would be the arbiter of what is equal? What's equal to you wouldn't be so equal to others...) is textbook liberal!

@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:

@bi4smooth

Equity, not Equality

Absolute proof you are a liberal.

I am a realist! The belief that absolute equality is possible is, in fact, a LIBERAL one!

More proof that you're the fake conservative, wrapping himself in a Trump blanket...

You are the one spouting off about Equity.

That is basic liberal dogma.

@bi4smooth

Equity, not Equality

Absolute proof you are a liberal.

I am a realist! The belief that absolute equality is possible is, in fact, a LIBERAL one!

More proof that you're the fake conservative, wrapping himself in a Trump blanket...

Equity, not Equality

Absolute proof you are a liberal.

@bi4smooth Oh, "Progress." Using democrat party terms and claiming to be Republican. Judge Joe Brown, a conservative black tv judge, said, "We're working on it." That describes it perfectly. There's no need to over-exaggerate. You're stating that equal rights is impossible to achieve. It's not. You're basically stating that civilization is impossible.

ROFL - your grasp of the English Language is wholly underwhelming...

Progress (in this case) is not even related to "Progressive" - the phrase is used to to acknowledge that perfection is not possible, but coming closer to the goal - in a repetitive, iterative process allows you to make inroads towards improvements - even if perfection is not possible.

There is absolutely no way that "Equal Rights" can possibly be achieved from each person's perspective. For every 1000 people, there are at least 1001 different ideas as to what "Equal Rights" would mean.

Civilization is not impossible... but a perfect civilization is...

I am sorry you have such a hard time with English. Perhaps if you'd paid better attention in school, or read material more challenging than the 5th-Grade readers... alas, that ship has passed...

@bi4smooth You don't believe in equal rights?... Well I don't go off what I believe. I try to focus on what I know.

I also don't believe in fairies, leprechauns, or sasquach.

But on a more serious note, you're misinterpreting things (as you have so often - for your own agenda)... "Equal Rights" is a laudable, if impossible goal. As I clearly explained when I first wrote it.

More equitable rights is achievable, equal rights is not.

I'll repeat it again, as you appear incapable of understanding:

Progress, not perfection.

Sure, you have objected to cancel culture. I agree that you have.

The difference is that you remain silent when Repubs are canceled, but defend liberal supporters of cancel culture when they are caught in their own shit and conservatives call for them to get a dose of their own medicine.

Normally, I am against cancel culture, but when an advocate of it gets caught, like the guy in this thread, he deserves to get a dose of his own medicine. A simple concept that is obviously too difficult for fake conservatives to understand.

@bi4smooth

Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.

Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.

No, indeed - I strongly implied that you were borderline illiterate - sorry if you missed it.

I have objected to cancel culture many times - but perhaps the first time you've heard it from me was in response to your stated desire to cancel this guy.

I believe that, if you look back several months, you went on a rant against cancel culture in general (because Trumpites - I think it was Mike Lindell) were in it's crosshairs... and I posted that it was a rare-instance of us agreeing on something!

Funny how you support "canceling" some, but not others... that's hypocritical

Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.

Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.

@bi4smooth

You keep telling yourself that.

I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.

Thanks again for telling me about my beliefs - I believe you don't have an actual argument to make, so you choose instead to attack me (mainly by calling me names)...

So you know, I do NOT believe in "EQUAL" rights - because that (at least at this time in our cultural history) is am impossible goal: the wealthy have extra rights (and the wealthier the more the "extras")...

But this isn't about rights, it's about PUNISHMENT.

And I don't believe in (nay, I OBJECT TO) cancel culture, plus I DO believe in redemption. I also believe in equitable (not equal!) justice... so punish, not cancel.

I would end by calling you a hypocrite.. but I don't want to stoop to your level (and I want to spare you the Google search)

You keep telling yourself that.

I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.

@bi4smooth

I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.

I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.

Protected? no, punished!

Have I mistakenly assumed you can read English?

I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.

I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.

@bi4smooth

AH, so you don't believe in equality.

Your fellow liberals support cancel culture, but you (all you liberals) are against calls for liberals to get a dose of their own medicine.

A guy that raised over $4mil because of a viral video has destroyed you liberals had to go hunting for something to ruin him. You dug up a post he made when he was 14, that's more than a decade old.

Yeah, let's protect a black guy who has a history of making racist and anti-semtic posts on his blog.

Anyone got a straw man? I need a straw man!