@MrMazda: The reason for this is primarily because if HAART can accomplish this in such a young person, why does it not yield the same result in an adult? Curious minds can't help but wonder. There are some biological pros and cons, the infant has more regenerative power, yet has less resilience, the time of infection and so on, yet I agree with you that it's true, this news normally come without a single info or link to a proper study paper, and that gets you always wondering about the truth in it.

@MikeChang: @bluehue: Hope? What do you think this is? Some sort of religion…   Kind of! To full appreciate the picture you have to be of a certain age I think, but it's because he's a friend of Dorothy. Tap you heals together 3 times and repeat this, There's no place like Rome, There's no place like Rome, There's no place like Rome Best combo ever, you sir rocked it.

o yea she pulled a knife on you when she was in the bathroom … doesn't add up. If it was a kitchen then maybe!

TLA Releasing Sagat 2013 hXXp://tlareleasing.com/details/product_details.cfm?id=345356]http://tlareleasing.com/details/product_details.cfm?id=345356 Edit: Live link disabled! Do NOT post clickable links in the forum.

Reports like this (whatever their accuracy) are important in raising awareness of all types of STDs to all people. Long gone are the days of money being spent on intensive educational campaigns in the 80s and 90s.

Trent, looking back, my post may have been misleading in that the headline I posted is, unfortunately, related to time, as is my point. The headline could just as easily have read "Scouts Refuse to Allow Gays To Join" and said nothing about them wanting to delay their decision. My point is that I do not think that now is the time for gays in the U.S. to fight this fight with the BSA. What the Scouts are doing is not illegal. It is done all of the time all across the U.S. We (none of us) want laws forcing them to allow gay Scouts. This fight is very different than the civil rights fight for equality. What we want there is to be treated equally in the eyes of the law. That is, in my opinion, the single most important struggle we should throw all of our resources behind right now. To get laws changed to allow is all of the liberties that straight people have. In the case of BSA, what is needed there is for them to have a change of heart, on their own. Of course, with a little prodding from us. As I stated in my original post, the struggle for full racial equality within the realm of private clubs is still not fully realized. If they wanted to, BSA could legally bar any Latino or Jewish people. Now, in the case of either of them being barred, those groups already have full legal rights within the U.S. so it would behoove them to take up that fight immediately. And you can bet that most of the U.S. population would be behind them. A much larger percentage than is behind us now. I believe that would be better for us to wait until we have more backing and stand a better chance of winning them over than to make multiple attempts, failing again and again. Each time it will become easier and easier for them to say no. In sort, I think that we have enough on our plate at the time. The laws of this land do not even consider us equal, it is a stretch to expect the BSA to at this time. And by the way, thanks for responding. Even if we disagree on this, it is nice to have the conversation.

@AndyZ: OMG this is hilarious!  Christian "scientists" attempting to explain homosexuality does not have biological underpinnings by the merely describing the common phenomena of biologic variation.  If it isn't hard coded into DNA, then "God" didn't intend it and it must be labelled sinful and must be shunned. There are hundreds of thousands of DNA variations that create the phenotypical individualism we see throughout the human race.  Not to mention the additional variation that is created as biology interacts with environment.  How ridiculous to sanctimoniously proclaim superiority of one variation over another. Variation is an integrate part of life that has allowed it to adapt and advance into many different strata of life.   Macro-Evolution describes how certain variations will tend to be advantageous, but are wholly dependent on the type of environment to which they are exposed over long periods of time, as in hundreds of thousand to millions of years.   Yet, in the micro-evolutionary scale, in which we live, variety IS the normal and desirable process of life.  But if one makes certain suppositions about life's origin, one no doubt will be led to faulty conclusions that actually have no foundation in true science.  And so it goes with our Christian "scientist" brethren. Of course here things could get slightly more complicated Andy cause if we can say that variation is an integrate part of life we could say also that this "variation" may be predicated of things we don't denote as living. English then has a wonderful word: lively. But, closing this semanic bracket which could lead us off topic, when we come  to a true science a false science a junk science a sound science….etc. thence the quite deep hole of the science, its methods and its problems seems to open...

Duncan Hosie, Princeton Student Who Challenged Antonin Scalia On 'Anti-Gay' Writings, Speaks Out The gay Princeton student who challenged Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on legal writings which some have deemed anti-gay is speaking out about the experience. In an appearance on MSNBC’s "The Last Word," Duncan Hosie said, "I think there’s a fundamental difference between arguing that the Constitution doesn’t protect gay rights and [saying that] the Constitution justifies that we need to use this language when talking about gay rights, and that was the point of my question." Hosie had questioned Scalia’s comparison of bans on sodomy to those on bestiality, murder and incest. Scalia was appearing at Princeton University to promote his new book, "Reading Law." Scalia replied by saying he was not equating sodomy with murder but rather drawing a parallel between the bans on both, but Hosie didn't buy it. "I think he needs to persuade a lot more Americans about his views because I think they're becoming increasingly out of the mainstream," Hosie, who said he received an "overwhelmingly positive" reaction after the story broke nationwide, noted. Video @  hXXp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/12/duncan-hosie-princeton-student-antonin-scalia-legal-writings_n_2286826.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

@leatherbear: :sorry: I did not reply earlier agis been very busy lately. IMHO most LGBT couples feel married and live life as a married couple. It is only when we come to some legal issue that we encounter problems. The $363,000 dollars is a prime example of these problems. It seems to me that the very root cause of most of these legal issues have as a basis for problems starts with the IRS and tax codes. There is a vast difference between single and married status within these Tax Codes and these differences follow thru to many other Laws,Rules and Regulations when dealing with other Government agencies. For me and many others, this fight is about equal treatment in these married vs single issues with the Government and its laws currently. [image: S-GayRightsMale-1.gif] No need to apologize of course  :hug2: you are always doing a lot for this forum imo and my jokes often border on the impertinence  ;D . Btw I quite agree with  you there. Every now and then it even happens one of your political or ideological enemies may prove up to give you a good laugh. On gay marriage in Italy, for instance, one of these straight à la Dongiovanni so said intellectuals  of the so said right, Vittorio Sgarbi,  once  said: Concerning marriage, to these gays who want it I'd do a really terrible and perfidious thing: I would bestow it on them. :laugh: and with that one might start to wonder how much a good deal of difficulties are truly correlated with this poor ill-treated sex…  ^-^

@myrea: @agis: Hmmm not sure if we already have matter for a general ahem "law" there. Myr? Bears?….  For me the need of "laws" in such matter is only to allow fair and equal financial and tax questions, I do not believe in marriage as a social practice, people are only married in the heart. :cheesy2: :bighug:  :love: :love: :blink: ^-^

Let's say bears they are now where we were a couple of centuries ago. On a general note a mole who observed the mankind from underground couldn't avoid to notice a certain incoordination between very structured you/I and a dispersed, destructured, broken we. Some social insects species could seem much more  efficient since in those dictatorships the dictator generally  asks only to be well-nourished in exchange for the continuity of the society itself without useless frills or illogical sacrifices. If we had to stand only to the you/me I happen to think even if I was straight I would have individually some problems to kick the chair under the feet of such a cutie pie  :drool: but sadly when we come to the we other things may happen  :pope: [image: 61834_Frank-Mugisha.jpg]

:afr: At least we do not have to live under these kind of laws anymore  :cheers:

There is not one scintilla of surprise to be found here in how the good doctor runs his rusty-squeezebox of a talkshow.  The Oz mode d'emploi is found in almost the entire breadth of hokem and clap-trap created for television in his name and, not-coincidentally, in another's: Harpo Productions (Oprah) His enervated "direction" of aides and co-producers in the developing and airing of a segment featuring people and information that, presumably— while reading byline in a make-up chair— he himself only discovered 15 minutes prior to, is idiocy on priceless display.