MuscleMatt?

Too bad you couldn't pay an additional point charge to get it promoted. 293 to freeleech it, 25 more points to get it bumped…or something like that

@duncanlem: I've only recently started uploading so I don't have a lot of seed points. I had my eye on one of my uploads for freeleeching so I saved some points thinking it would be about 120ish points, that seemed to be the average. It became eligible today and it's gonna cost 293 points  :afr: How is the point cost determined? Is there a chart? Nice avatar!!!  And my sentiments, exactly. We don't have a chart, per se, the price of freeleeching is just (as far as I know) directly relative to the size of the torrent's contents. Have a look-see here: https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=54539.0 I've posted my "tutorial" on freeleech, in the second comment in this thread. Take care! Pawpcorn GTRU Staff

I got a removal notice the other day as well.  I won't say the studio name because I don't want to draw attention to it because of this question: My torrent was removed at the studio's request. But, if you do a search for this studio's name there are still other clips of theirs on the site. Some of them are almost a year old. Why so random?

Have a look-see at this topic; my tutorial is post #2  :hug: Take care, Pawpcorn GTRU Staff

Hi, and terrific question… I don't think the counter is available to non staff, at this time... BUT here's today's stats:   Peers 860,800 Take care, Pawpcorn GTRU Staff

This member said (when writing the helpdesk) that this wasn't actually a PM, but a pop-up notice that his level of warning had been reduced… :blind:

thanks for info

@Pawpcorn: yes, it's dead at this time. the proper format link is: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=2d485d5458fce9df71a4245d9ffa993a12f9651761169021 Did you send a Reseed Request? I did that, and made it freeleech (to try and pick up seeders) and promoted it to the top of the public list for you. It was last downloaded in November last year, so it hasn't been dead long. Take care, Pawpcorn GTRU Staff Thanks a bunch. Yes, I did a reseed request as well.

You mean sexercise isn't cardio enough for you? hehe

a lot of the vintage stuff needs to be saved or it will go into extinction the whole old reliable collection is in danger of this I wish someone would create a list of all the movies from that studio and match the names of the models who were in each vid. Hell post the catalogs here too.

I downloaded this One… It's a eso me!!! https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=52f891c6ad2ef75029c036039dadd1d26a18d67bc84528dc

Hmm maybe try 221… I bet it has holes?

I would have to disagree with you on this one Frederick. I have NEVER had a problem with slow speeds on a VPN. Sure, there is a TINY amount of less from the overhead created from the encryption, however from my experience, this loss is negligible at best. Also, there is another HUGE benefit to using a VPN, most especially in the United States. Trum has done away with a few safeguards, which has allowed American ISP's and copyright trolls to bypass the normal subpoena process by purchasing your browsing history direct from your ISP (among a few other ways he has enabled). Not using a VPN leaves you open to all kinds of spying. Sure, if you're not doing anything illegal, you've got nothing to worry about in theory, but the question then becomes at what point will the government stop with their spying? Also, there's the whole question of whether or not sacrificing your privacy is really a good thing, or if it opens the door to a number of potential downfalls later on down the line. Also, what you're referring to is a deep-trace, which required the use of at least two different VPN stations to tunnel through. The chances of this happening over a copyright claim are virtually nonexistent. So… If you're just looking for the added browsing privacy, and/or you're looking for a great way to be able to avoid copyright trolls, a VPN would be the way to go, as long as you can find one that will fit your needs, and does NOT log connection information. This will keep that kind of thing at bay by imposing an impassable road block more or less to that kind of thing. By the time they even could THINK about getting around the first layer, you'd be long gone.... We're talking about downloading questionable content from a copyright perspective here... Not hacking the Pentagon  :funny2: :funny2: :funny2:

Handbrake, I've used it for years and it works well and its very popular and its fast, free and easy to use.

While Treasure Island Media content is often viewed as highly controversial, you would be surprised to find that there is actually a rather large group of individuals who eroticize the transmission of HIV. Now, with this in mind, understand that everyone has a right to choose what is right for them. If their decisions and actions do not affect anyone else, then I fail to understand where the problem is. I will admit, having contracted HIV myself through non-disclosure myself, and subsequently, having been wrongfully accused of non-disclosure, I have some very strong views with regards to the law. First, I need to point out that the activities in question were performed are only legally classified as criminal when two main conditions have been met: Disclosure of HIV status did not occur PRIOR to the sexual acts taking place and Had disclosure occurred, consent would not have been given to engage in those sexual acts In this case, not only did disclosure occur, but by a conscious decision that the performers in question made was made specifically BECAUSE they are HIV+. So in the context of the law, no… This does NOT constitute criminal activity. Now... With that being said, having been wrongfully accused of non-disclosure, I am a strong believer that the criminal courts should NOT get involved with this kind of thing because far too often, the allegations are made out of spite, and the life of the person living with HIV is irreparably destroyed forever (like in my case). So... I understand that it may be controversial in nature, however, from a legal point of view, the activities depicted are NOT criminal because the acts were voluntary and consensual, and were consented to, knowing that HIV was a factor. As such, there is nothing criminal about the video, and we must respect our users's right to the freedom of choice. While this particular type of content may not be for you, we do have a large number of users who are very interested in this type of material. Other types of videos that can bring great controversy include our straight, bi, and scat categories. It all boils down to a common ground where we kinda have to say "Well, that's not for me, but whatever floats your boat" and scroll on. Now in the event of something that does indeed involve criminal activity or is otherwise illegal, we do have policies in place for handling such matters. This video however IMHO is not one that falls into any violation.