Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House
-
-
@raphjd Yes, MAP, also don't forget "pansexual".
We def had a thread where @jaroonn tried to have "pansexual" in official LGBTQ+blahbarf acronym.
But if you fuck consenting adults: Bisexual, Trans & Queer already cover idea that you'll fuck all kinds.
ONLY reason to push "pansexual" then, is............... if you don't fuck consenting adults. If you normalize fucking kids & animals. If.
It can hardly be doubted that Pedos & other Predators & Perverts, see acronym 'P' and go "haha we made everyone say it's pansexual snicker snicker - it's us"
-
@raphjd The Groomer Libel is homophobic because the proponents of it, including yourself, support things like "Don't Say Gay" bills. Such bills are explicitly homophobic.
For example, under Florida's bill young children could be read the following book by their teacher in school:
But those same students could NOT be read this book:
And the only difference between the two books is that the first one features a heteronormative family unit, and the second one does not. That's a bigoted policy.
Teaching children about the existence of LGBT families doesn't involve pornography. It no more involves discussing ass fucking than talking about mommies and daddies involves talking about pussy pounding.
-
"Groomer" began with Jeffrey Epstein scandal ie. heterosexual.
What he & his clients - you know, Bill Clinton with his 26+ visits to Epstein Island - did to young girls.
Only YOU & your ilk, link it to homosexuality.
I don't. I link it to pedophilia alone, independent of homosexual or heterosexual.... ....except when it's in front of me locally - as sometimes in this forum - I object to it locally.
Every time YOU link groomer to homosexual, @hubrys, you confirm your homophobia & unhealed damage.
Again: I don't. - And sometimes or apparently, you do.
As to whatever laws you're going on about: they never banned gay discussions with kids - only pornographic discussions.
You know that - as it's been explained to you.
Yet you persist in your falsehoods, which SUGGESTS that being able to have pornographic discussions with kids COULD be what's important??
If yes,
-
@blablarg18 said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
As to whatever laws you're going on about: they never banned gay discussions with kids - only pornographic discussions.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Let me quote the actual Florida law language, as it currently reads after amendment in 2023.
Fla. Stat. 1001.42(8)(c)(3) states:
"Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in prekindergarten through grade 8, except when required by ss. 1003.42(2)(n)3. and 1003.46. If such instruction is provided in grades 9 through 12, the instruction must be age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards. This subparagraph applies to charter schools."
Read it with your own goddamn eyes above. It's not about pornography. It's not about sex books. The "Don't Say Gay" bill specifically and explicitly forbids school personnel from any instruction involving sexual orientation or sexual identity.
It doesn't say, "Don't show kids books with titties and cocks." It's sexual orientation. Under Florida's law, a teacher legally CANNOT read that book about a girl having two dads. That's what Florida banned. Not pornography.
Now, I understand why you thought the law did something different. That's because the forces trying to erase LGBT people sold this law on the basis of protecting children from grooming. But the law was always anti-gay.
In fact, it doesn't even stop kids from seeing pornography. So long as the material is heteronormative (i.e., a man fucking a woman) then this law doesn't even ban it. It does nothing to protect children from inappropriate heterosexual content.
You were, in fact, sold a lie.
Also please note that the law has been expanded beyond elementary school children. It was amended to apply up to the 8th grade. And it extends beyond to 12th grade so long as anyone complains, as you know a conservative will. So, it de facto covers pre-K thru 12th grade now.
Don't bullshit me when you haven't even read the law itself.
-
And just in case you're thinking, "Oh, well that's just the general language they used. The law is really just about grooming," then let me dissuade you of that delusion.
If Florida had wanted to pass an anti-grooming law, then it could have done so using clear, explicit, unambiguous language. It didn't do that, because that's not what this Bill was about.
-
There is no such thing as the "don't say gay" bill.
The bill you are referring to say that you can't talk to kids below a certain grade (can't remember if it's below 3rd grade or including 3rd grade) about sex and/or sexuality.
You people created the situation you are complaining about. You put porn in school libraries, then called anyone who objected "assholes".
These are the same books that have had parents arrested for reading out loud at school board meetings because the books are deemed too obscene except in school libraries. One mother was arrested for simply opening the book, because the same people that approved the book said the pictures were obscene.
Of course, you are too far gone to understand the hypocrisy.
-
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
The bill you are referring to say that you can't talk to kids below a certain grade (can't remember if it's below 3rd grade or including 3rd grade) about sex and/or sexuality.
Dumbass, I can tell you didn't read. I quote for you directly the law as it reads on Florida's law books right now. I will do so again since you couldn't read it the first time.
Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in prekindergarten through grade 8, except when required by ss. 1003.42(2)(n)3. and 1003.46. If such instruction is provided in grades 9 through 12, the instruction must be age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards. This subparagraph applies to charter schools.
-
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
You put porn in school libraries
Also, why didn't Florida pass a law to ban putting pornography in school libraries? The "Don't Say Gay" bill doesn't do that.
As I pointed out, that bill has no effect on a book featuring heterosexual pornography. If a pre-K school library has a book called, "Baby's First Titty Fuck," this bill does nothing.
Now, if there's a book about Sally having two mothers, no nudity or discussion of sexual intercourse at all, then the bill WOULD ban that book.
-
OK, so it was a higher age than I remembered.
AGAIN, you people created the situation that you are now whining about. You people put porn in school libraries and this is the blow back.
If the books are too obscene to be at school board meetings, then they definitely way too obscene to be in a K-5 school library or any other school library.
-
These are the kinds of books you want in school libraries. And if parents show the pictures and/or read from them, then you have them arrested for obscenity.
-
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
OK, so it was a higher age than I remembered
Not only a higher grade level, but also it doesn't say SEX. The bill explicitly says
sexual orientation or gender identity
This isn't an anti-sex bill. It's an anti-LGBT bill.
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
You people put porn in school libraries and this is the blow back.
Then why didn't Florida pass a law to prevent porn in libraries? Again, the "Don't Say Gay" bill does nothing about pornography.
-
Teachers secretly coaching kids into transing and all manner of things is what you people did and now you cry about the backlash.
Back in my day, we were always told not to keep secrets from our parents and now you guys want us to do it. That is grooming tactics.
-
@raphjd Poor raphjd got his ass handed to him and now he's trying to change the subject.
You said the "Don't Say Gay" bill was about sex and preventing pornography in school libraries. You can have your own private opinion, but you don't get your own private facts.
I showed you what the actual law says. You were proven wrong.
Now you're tucking your tail and trying to throw out a red herring.
Wow, you're pathetic!
Fox News, OANN, Tucker Carlson, or whoever you were listening to about the "Don't Say Gay" bill was lying to you. You were lied to. Just admit it and learn from it.
-
I've done a bit of research and I'm finding articles from Florida that say it's below 4th grade.
and the so-called "Don't Say Gay" bill, which bans instruction involving gender identity and sexual orientation before fourth gradeThat's from an article that whines about banning LGBT books in school libraries.
Of course, they don't mention that school boards in the state have banned classics like Huck Finn, To Kill A Mocking Bird and many more because liberals don't want them in school libraries.
-
You are getting the backlash you deserve for your (liberals) antics in schools.
What red herring? Schools are being sued for this crap. I would have thought a know it all lawyer would know that. A month or so ago, a school settled for $500k.
-
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
I've done a bit of research and I'm finding articles from Florida that say it's below 4th grade.
I suggest you keep researching until you find where it's amendment changing the text was approved by the Governor on 5/17/2023 and went into effect on July 1, 2023.
You can find it here:
-
This is the 2023 amendment approved by DeSantis and went into effect on July 1, 2023. The crossed-out words were removed from the codified statute, and the underlined words were added. I did your "research" for you. Stop being lied to by Fox News, OANN, Carlson, or whatever news source you rely on. This, below, is the REAL world and what the REAL law says.
-
What is wrong with that?
Back in my day, teachers didn't talk about their sexual orientation or who they were fucking. They didn't indoctrinate us into queer theory and white guilt. They didn't push liberal propaganda on us.
From 6th grade, we had health ed, which taught us about our bodies, puberty, and whatnot, but we didn't have sex ed until 9th grade. This was in liberal Illinois.
-
@raphjd It's sad that you think acknowledging that gays exist is "liberal propaganda." You must truly have a great deal of self-hate.
@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
They didn't indoctrinate us into queer theory
How is this "queer theory?"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login