Only liberals are blind to some of the worst of the worst behaviors we've been seeing over the last several years.

We had the drag queen that wore a short, short skirt and no underwear to read to kids. No arrest was made, because; reasons. Truns out that the leader of the group was a former judge who became a convicted pedo.

The public library in the UK (I posted about it) that hired an adult rated circus troop to do an event for a kids' story time series. You may remember that the "ringleader" had her tits nearly out and the monkey had his ass hanging out and a huge dildo sticking out the front.

Pornographic books have been put in elementary school libraries. These same books have gotten parents arrested for obsenity for showing opening he books and showing the pictures contained inside. Parents have also been arrested for simply reading from these same books.

A father was arrested because the school board secretly transferred a trans or non-binary student (depending who is reporting on it) who raped a girl at his previous school and his daughter was raped by the same student.

We just had a gang of black students stomp and beat to death a white student.

Jamal Newton had 47 felony arrests in NYC and was released each time without bail. After his 47th release, he went on the infamous hammer attack spree.

We have the white teacher's aide who took away the black student's handheld game console, so he beat the living shit out of her. The school district blames her for the attack because black people can't control themselves or some such shit, so she should have known better. She's on unpaid medical leave.

MIT is refusing to follow their own rules and federal guidelines to protect muslim and liberal students. MIT won't do anything if you attack physically jews on their campus. Disagree with Islam and you get expelled.

BREAKING: All Jan 6 footage publicly RELEASED by House Speaker Mike Johnson

"I am keeping my promise to the American people and making all the January 6th tapes available to ALL Americans."

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-jan-6-footage-publicly-released-by-house-speaker-mike-johnson

A Day that will Live in Hyperbole

Mike Johnson’s comments on a prayer call in October, during which he talked about church attendance and L.G.B.T.Q. youth, offered an up-to-date distillation of his views.

Mike Johnson doesn't have any retirement savings, own a single stock, or have any assets at all. He has less than $5,000 in his bank account.

He's got a 250-500K mortgage, a home equity loan, and a personal loan.

So what's his retirement plan? To lobby?

If Johnson did lobby in retirement, well libs do it nonstop.

But here's the point. USA Congress is famous for insider trades.

Pelosi, Fauxcahontas Warren, Bernie Sanders, tons of Dems..... GOP sleazeballs too..... make ten million$$ from stock trades with their insider knowledge.

If Johnson is as poor as the lib writer claims: Johnson didn't.

That's good. But, as lib, the writer needs to make it bad somehow.

https://twitter.com/MEPFuller/status/1719720689010184514

There's a huge difference between saying gays exist and the stuff we've seen in secretly recorded videos or what teachers themselves say on social media.

Project Veritas exposed one male teacher who said he wanted to turn his students into "little queer warriors".

A Scottish teen got expelled for saying there are only 2 genders. He's far from the only case of this happening.

We see the videos teachers upload of their little students "protesting" for BLM by marching up and down the hall shouting BLM slogans.

There's the video of the dad who was called into his son's school because the son would not stop crying. The teacher put him in a dress and he didn't like it so he cried. The teacher made him stay in the dress. The teacher didn't seem like she knew what she did wrong.

Social media is full of this stuff.

Mainstream media won't show it, because it destroys their liberal narrative. Local news isn't as bad as national news.

This crap is rampant.

@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:

They didn't indoctrinate us into queer theory

How is this "queer theory?"

What is wrong with that?

Back in my day, teachers didn't talk about their sexual orientation or who they were fucking. They didn't indoctrinate us into queer theory and white guilt. They didn't push liberal propaganda on us.

From 6th grade, we had health ed, which taught us about our bodies, puberty, and whatnot, but we didn't have sex ed until 9th grade. This was in liberal Illinois.

I've done a bit of research and I'm finding articles from Florida that say it's below 4th grade.

I suggest you keep researching until you find where it's amendment changing the text was approved by the Governor on 5/17/2023 and went into effect on July 1, 2023.

You can find it here:

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/1069

You are getting the backlash you deserve for your (liberals) antics in schools.

What red herring? Schools are being sued for this crap. I would have thought a know it all lawyer would know that. A month or so ago, a school settled for $500k.

I've done a bit of research and I'm finding articles from Florida that say it's below 4th grade.

https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/more-than-350-books-banned-in-florida-schools-since-last-july-16817328

and the so-called "Don't Say Gay" bill, which bans instruction involving gender identity and sexual orientation before fourth grade

That's from an article that whines about banning LGBT books in school libraries.

Of course, they don't mention that school boards in the state have banned classics like Huck Finn, To Kill A Mocking Bird and many more because liberals don't want them in school libraries.

You said the "Don't Say Gay" bill was about sex and preventing pornography in school libraries. You can have your own private opinion, but you don't get your own private facts.

I showed you what the actual law says. You were proven wrong.

Now you're tucking your tail and trying to throw out a red herring.

Wow, you're pathetic!

Fox News, OANN, Tucker Carlson, or whoever you were listening to about the "Don't Say Gay" bill was lying to you. You were lied to. Just admit it and learn from it.

Teachers secretly coaching kids into transing and all manner of things is what you people did and now you cry about the backlash.

Back in my day, we were always told not to keep secrets from our parents and now you guys want us to do it. That is grooming tactics.

OK, so it was a higher age than I remembered

Not only a higher grade level, but also it doesn't say SEX. The bill explicitly says

sexual orientation or gender identity

This isn't an anti-sex bill. It's an anti-LGBT bill.

@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:

You people put porn in school libraries and this is the blow back.

Then why didn't Florida pass a law to prevent porn in libraries? Again, the "Don't Say Gay" bill does nothing about pornography.

OK, so it was a higher age than I remembered.

AGAIN, you people created the situation that you are now whining about. You people put porn in school libraries and this is the blow back.

If the books are too obscene to be at school board meetings, then they definitely way too obscene to be in a K-5 school library or any other school library.

You put porn in school libraries

Also, why didn't Florida pass a law to ban putting pornography in school libraries? The "Don't Say Gay" bill doesn't do that.

As I pointed out, that bill has no effect on a book featuring heterosexual pornography. If a pre-K school library has a book called, "Baby's First Titty Fuck," this bill does nothing.

Now, if there's a book about Sally having two mothers, no nudity or discussion of sexual intercourse at all, then the bill WOULD ban that book.

The bill you are referring to say that you can't talk to kids below a certain grade (can't remember if it's below 3rd grade or including 3rd grade) about sex and/or sexuality.

Dumbass, I can tell you didn't read. I quote for you directly the law as it reads on Florida's law books right now. I will do so again since you couldn't read it the first time.

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in prekindergarten through grade 8, except when required by ss. 1003.42(2)(n)3. and 1003.46. If such instruction is provided in grades 9 through 12, the instruction must be age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards. This subparagraph applies to charter schools.

There is no such thing as the "don't say gay" bill.

The bill you are referring to say that you can't talk to kids below a certain grade (can't remember if it's below 3rd grade or including 3rd grade) about sex and/or sexuality.

You people created the situation you are complaining about. You put porn in school libraries, then called anyone who objected "assholes".

These are the same books that have had parents arrested for reading out loud at school board meetings because the books are deemed too obscene except in school libraries. One mother was arrested for simply opening the book, because the same people that approved the book said the pictures were obscene.

Of course, you are too far gone to understand the hypocrisy.

If Florida had wanted to pass an anti-grooming law, then it could have done so using clear, explicit, unambiguous language. It didn't do that, because that's not what this Bill was about.

As to whatever laws you're going on about: they never banned gay discussions with kids - only pornographic discussions.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Let me quote the actual Florida law language, as it currently reads after amendment in 2023.

Fla. Stat. 1001.42(8)(c)(3) states:

"Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in prekindergarten through grade 8, except when required by ss. 1003.42(2)(n)3. and 1003.46. If such instruction is provided in grades 9 through 12, the instruction must be age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards. This subparagraph applies to charter schools."

Read it with your own goddamn eyes above. It's not about pornography. It's not about sex books. The "Don't Say Gay" bill specifically and explicitly forbids school personnel from any instruction involving sexual orientation or sexual identity.

It doesn't say, "Don't show kids books with titties and cocks." It's sexual orientation. Under Florida's law, a teacher legally CANNOT read that book about a girl having two dads. That's what Florida banned. Not pornography.

Now, I understand why you thought the law did something different. That's because the forces trying to erase LGBT people sold this law on the basis of protecting children from grooming. But the law was always anti-gay.

In fact, it doesn't even stop kids from seeing pornography. So long as the material is heteronormative (i.e., a man fucking a woman) then this law doesn't even ban it. It does nothing to protect children from inappropriate heterosexual content.

You were, in fact, sold a lie.

Also please note that the law has been expanded beyond elementary school children. It was amended to apply up to the 8th grade. And it extends beyond to 12th grade so long as anyone complains, as you know a conservative will. So, it de facto covers pre-K thru 12th grade now.

Don't bullshit me when you haven't even read the law itself.

What he & his clients - you know, Bill Clinton with his 26+ visits to Epstein Island - did to young girls.

Only YOU & your ilk, link it to homosexuality.

I don't. I link it to pedophilia alone, independent of homosexual or heterosexual.... ....except when it's in front of me locally - as sometimes in this forum - I object to it locally.

Every time YOU link groomer to homosexual, @hubrys, you confirm your homophobia & unhealed damage.

Again: I don't. - And sometimes or apparently, you do.

As to whatever laws you're going on about: they never banned gay discussions with kids - only pornographic discussions.

You know that - as it's been explained to you.

Yet you persist in your falsehoods, which SUGGESTS that being able to have pornographic discussions with kids COULD be what's important??

If yes,

For example, under Florida's bill young children could be read the following book by their teacher in school:

But those same students could NOT be read this book:

And the only difference between the two books is that the first one features a heteronormative family unit, and the second one does not. That's a bigoted policy.

Teaching children about the existence of LGBT families doesn't involve pornography. It no more involves discussing ass fucking than talking about mommies and daddies involves talking about pussy pounding.

We def had a thread where @jaroonn tried to have "pansexual" in official LGBTQ+blahbarf acronym.

But if you fuck consenting adults: Bisexual, Trans & Queer already cover idea that you'll fuck all kinds.

ONLY reason to push "pansexual" then, is............... if you don't fuck consenting adults. If you normalize fucking kids & animals. If.

It can hardly be doubted that Pedos & other Predators & Perverts, see acronym 'P' and go "haha we made everyone say it's pansexual snicker snicker - it's us"