New search program Tag suggestions….......
-
Ah. That explains the ~bd tag, but what about one for ~beta as in Sony Beta… The competitor to VHS?
-
I will work on adding the most recent suggestions for tags to the lists later today…........
-
Ah. That explains the ~bd tag, but what about one for ~beta as in Sony Beta… The competitor to VHS?
You didn't hoover over the VHSrip tag in the tags table, di you?
~VHSrip tag description given : Conversion based on any analogue video tape source (VHS, S-VHS, Beta, Video2000, Hi8 …)
-
…
~Caucasian -- This ethnicity/race is missing. Diversity works both ways. :hug2:...
Though I agree with aiweelie that it works both ways, the term ~caucasian seems not to be approbate.
See for example the wikipedia article about it hxxp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_raceI would never call my self to be Caucasian, which IMHO is a pejorative term. I would call me European for which we have already the tag ~euros (if I understood correctly for what that tag shall be used, some more fefinitions to the tags would be good)
Remains to find a tag for White Americans (and Australians)
-
@Uwe:
You didn't hoover over the VHSrip tag in the tags table, di you?
~VHSrip tag description given : Conversion based on any analogue video tape source (VHS, S-VHS, Beta, Video2000, Hi8 …)
Guilty as charged :congrats: to me on my failure to read :rotfl:
-
I added Caucasian to the list already… :crazy2: ... Should I remove it till a better term exists ?
-
Thanks Leathebear for adding all those juicy new ~butt tags especially ~smooth-butt. I overlooked that one. :cool2:
I would never call my self to be Caucasian, which IMHO is a pejorative term. I would call me European for which we have already the tag ~euros (if I understood correctly for what that tag shall be used, some more fefinitions to the tags would be good)
Uwe, all ethnic designations IMHO are pejorative in some form. I wonder how a person of color who's lived in France all their life when featured in erotica is billed as interracial feels being highlighted exclusively for their "otherness" Aren't they're ~euro's too? It seems like all ~Hispanic, ~arab, ~asian, ~latino or black men when featured in Euro-American productions has to be listed by one those ethic pejoratives. My collection and what I upload is predominately non-Caucasian. I collect them because they tend to be rarer than works that feature all Caucasian casts. I need a ~tag to for all the types of men in my collection.
So let's all move away from how those terms may have been negatively used in the pass and embrace the diversity of their meanings like we do with ~youngblood ~bear or ~bsdm. ~Caucasians like other tags about cast members attempts to describe someone's physical attributes in a manner in which the can be indexed and recognized by others. I think we all realize history of terms like blacks and Asians as being modern adaptations of terms Negroid and Mongoloid (the Wikipedia link mentioned that too).
I'm not attempting to argue about the validity of any racial tag. However if were going to use ~tags for people of color we need a ~tag that broadly defines members of our humanity which have significantly less color, with a higher probabilities of non-brown hair and eye colors than most.
"Early on in the [anti-racism] workshop there was an exercise which focused on "cultural racism and white cultural identity." Whites in the workshop were asked to talk about white culture. Most couldn't or wouldn't. The expression meant nothing to me. Nevertheless, we all struggled with it. As time went on we discovered that, in a sense, it was a trick question. The facilitators wanted the whites to struggle and to discover that the expression did have little or no content. Racial designations, white and black, are totally social constructs. "What then," they asked, "would you say about your culture? How would you define your culture and your relationship to it?" Though most of the whites had a difficult time talking about her/his culture - some resisted pretty strenuously - the trainers took a clear stand: if whites are to come to the multi-cultural table, they - we - must reclaim our individual cultural backgrounds. In many ways, we were reminded, African Americans are way ahead of European Americans in retaining their cultural identities." How the Irish Became White, A sermon by Art MacDonald, Ph.D. hxxp://academic.udayton.edu/race/01race/white13.htm
-
At other occasions I've already mentioned my bad feeling about these racial categories and tags. As you saw, I agree with you that there should be as well tags for "people like me" with a rather light skin tone (if you like, close to a modern house pig skin).
You are as well right in pointing out that "European" isn't the right term either, because it got as well a geographical / political dimension and all people born and/or grown up in Europe are Europeans. Remembers as well my doubt expressed of the ~euros tag meaning.
Any person born in France is usually French and distinguishing by race terms is politically incorrect here. Nevertheless there is fro example a Gay Tea Dance called "Blanc Black Beur" (White , Black and Butter", where Beur is what are called born French with roots from North Africa). That tea dance is 90% Beur and organized by them.However in my eyes the "Caucasian" term falls in the same category as the by you mentioned "Negroid" and "Mongoloid" terms, though certainly less pejorative.
The question for me is not if, but what is / are the right term(s) to use for the type of people you call Caucasian. Sorry the best I could find is "White".
This "race" based categorisations / tagging is really slippery ground. I feel not comfortable with it, but understand that it is meant as a help for members having a preference for a certain type of guys.
-
However in my eyes the "Caucasian" term falls in the same category as the by you mentioned "Negroid" and "Mongoloid" terms
.
Unlike Negroid and Mongoloid terms Europeans chose to denote themselves as Caucasians According to the Wikipedia entry you cited, a German anthropologist coined the term in the 1800 to define ethnicity of Europeans.
The question for me is not if, but what is / are the right term(s) to use for the type of people you call Caucasian.
I ponder the use of ~blacks for very light-skinned mixed raced blacks with freckles. ~blacks is generally used to describe a body type of a person usually with thicker lips and broader noses no matter how light-skinned they are.
A.
-
…
Unlike Negroid and Mongoloid terms Europeans chose to denote themselves as Caucasians According to the Wikipedia entry you cited, a German anthropologist coined the term in the 1800 to define ethnicity of Europeans.
...That is a term of long gone times, the article starts saying "… has been used..." it does not say ."...is used..." If I understood right rather meant as categorization of pre-historic men kinds and a theory about our origin? I don't think that that scientist denoted himself as Caucasian.
-
Unlike you I have not nor will I ever categorize myself by race or ethnicity. I think it's repugnant. However I do understand the spirit of how these tags are being used here to help our brothers find content that appeals to them. I also respect you desire to find a racial tag that more appropriately identifies the race you ascribe to yourself. It obvious that there's something taboo about the calling people "white" because theirs no tag for it here although you've infer you are and might share that racial make-up with "white Americans and Australians."
What get's me is that until I mentioned it there wasn't a tag for whites like their was for nearly every other so called non-white guy. IOW until I mentioned no one thought of an ethnicity tag for whites? Yet no one voiced an objection to the use of blacks and Asians tags to denote people the same way "Negroid" and "Mongoloid" were formerly used with all the inappropriateness of their former connotations.
To sum up I strongly believe all racial tags based on Caucasian, Negroid or Mongoloid are offensive to diversity of all humanity. So unless we're going to investigate ALL racial tags being used here and their appropriateness in being applied to those groups I honestly don't see this discussion moving beyond your personal suggestion that my use of Caucasian is wrong. No matter how often you cite Wikipedia. I can cite references that support that "the idea of "race" has always carried more meanings than mere physical differences; indeed, physical variations in the human species have no meaning except the social ones that humans put on them." hxxp://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm
-
It is YOU who pushed me to categorize myself as "European" or "White" and it appears to be a trap. Usually I don't use a race attribute for myself, but a nationality attribute "European" and the nation of which I hold a passport.
My objection is only against "Caucasian", I can life with "White" or even "Pink" if people want to give such attributes to me.
I've as well already expressed earlier that I don't feel comfortable with any race categorisation, that it is slippery ground, politically incorrect and that there should be a tag for "white", too as to treat all equal. You try to push me into a corner I don't want to be.
BTW: Why are you using "race" tags in your uploads? Nobody is forcing you to use them
-
If you want a tag for ~white then advocate for it and stop trying to argue with me about what you want to be called. It's never been about YOU. It's about the casts of the videos and works I/We upload. To not have adequate tags for the specific ETHNICITY of whites/Caucasians whether they resided in Europe or abroad was a glaring omission. I merely pointed out that omission and suggested a correction.
It's your faulty racial rhetoric entrapped you. And if you truly feel that way this discussion can serve no further purpose. If you don't like racial/ethnicity tags then don't use them. Or use the tags you prefer. I know I'm NOT using these tags the manner in which White supremacists of the past used them. The negative socio-political overtones you're attempting infer only applies to use of ~Caucasian while attempting to ignore they ALSO existed for ~blacks, ~latinos and ~Asians too is what completely boggles my mind. I'm puzzled why you're even engaging in such a NO WIN argument. It seem to me like you only care about racial tags when they can be applied to YOU.
-
If you want a tag for ~white then advocate for it and stop trying to argue with me about what you want to be called. It's never been about YOU. It's about the casts of the videos and works I/We upload. To not have adequate tags for the specific ETHNICITY of whites/Caucasians whether they resided in Europe or abroad was a glaring omission. I merely pointed out that omission and suggested a correction.
I didn't advocate for ~whites, because I am not sure if it is appropriate than ~caucasians. You ignore totally that since my first answer I've said that I agree with you that there should be a tag for what you name ~caucasians
It's your faulty racial rhetoric entrapped you. And if you truly feel that way this discussion can serve no further purpose. If you don't like racial/ethnicity tags then don't use them. Or use the tags you prefer. I know I'm NOT using these tags the manner in which White supremacists of the past used them. The negative socio-political overtones you're attempting infer only applies to use of ~Caucasian while attempting to ignore they ALSO existed for ~blacks, ~latinos and ~Asians too is what completely boggles my mind. I'm puzzled why you're even engaging in such a NO WIN argument.
Well your rhetoric entraps you as well
It seem to me like you only care about racial tags when they can be applied to YOU.
That is what you get from here, because indeed I feel directly involved as being part of group called ~caucasians by you ( a term I personally don't like). Hoping to stop it being added right away and have some larger membership expressing what they think about ~caucasians tag or another possible tags for that lack. Unfortunately there is no other participation than you and me.
In general, I think new tags shouldn't been added just because there is a single request for it, there should be a reflection about what is the best general term, avoiding micro tags, to much overlapping etc… For example ~Timberlands isn't a good tag IMHO, because it uses a brand. Shall we promote a brand? But then what is the right generic term for such boots? "Work boots? no idea ...
However what you can't see, is for example a recent internal staff discussion about a new category, where from the start of my participation I've expressed my bad feeling about this type of tags (and then participated what could be the right
)
Now I think we should start an internal discussion about another new category -
That is what you get from here, because indeed I feel directly involved as being part of group called ~caucasians by you ( a term I personally don't like). Hoping to stop it being added right away and have some larger membership expressing what they think about ~caucasians tag or another possible tags for that lack. Unfortunately there is no other participation than you and me.
Why? Is anyone uploading any works with you in them?
This has been my critique of your motivation all along. If you object to ~Caucasians and don't not object to the use of other racial tags like ~blacks or ~Asians I believe your argument is flawed.
-
Hey guys
This race discussion won't bring anything good, each of you two will answer the other one and it will get worse.
We all read your arguments (i read you 3 times now) and understood what you both meant.
I'm sure both of you aren't happy the way this topic goes now, so why not stop answering (please) ?It's not a sign of weakness to stop arguing, even if you both think are right.
On the contrary, it shows a mental strength ("i can stop answering even if i think i'm right and i will stop answering right now because i would like things to calm down")Please staff, discuss it internally and choose the best word who will agree to the majority of you, update the list and everybody will be happy again.
Hugs to (alphabetical order lol) Aiweelie & Uwe :hug2:
Not forgetting our unforgettable Leatherbear ! :hug: -
Blackdid.
Uwe and I are guilty of nothing more than having a discussion about a very complex topic. Neither of us have been uncivil to one another. I believe this discussion is important because it could lead to something beyond racial categories or something better than ~Caucasians that means people who have traditionally associated those living in the Western part of the Northern Hemisphere.
I welcome your opinions but not like this. Hiding behind some anonymous "we." Other than you who is part of your "we"?
Hey guys
This race discussion won't bring anything good, each of you two will answer the other one and it will get worse.
We all read your arguments (i read you 3 times now) and understood what you both meant.
I'm sure both of you aren't happy the way this topic goes now, so why not stop answering (please) ?It's not a sign of weakness to stop arguing, even if you both think are right.
On the contrary, it shows a mental strength ("i can stop answering even if i think i'm right and i will stop answering right now because i would like things to calm down")Please staff, discuss it internally and choose the best word who will agree to the majority of you, update the list and everybody will be happy again.
Hugs to (alphabetical order lol) Aiweelie & Uwe :hug2:
Not forgetting our unforgettable Leatherbear ! :hug: -
…
This has been my critique of your motivation all along. If you object to ~Caucasians and don't not object to the use of other racial tags like ~blacks or ~Asians I believe your argument is flawed.That is simply NOT what I ever expressed here.
-
might i make a suggestion?
Since this is a tagging mechanism, it would automatically try to group torrents into certain groups. and as "groups" there should be a label because if we don't label it then people wouldn't know what the tag was.
Maybe we can agree not to be offended if terms like white, black, latino, asian, or caucasian were used, depending on what the moderators decide? Not everything has to be taken offensively, or even personally.
Would be sad if we defined ourselves solely by the tags that are present on this site.
-
I welcome your opinions but not like this. Hiding behind some anonymous "we." Other than you who is part of your "we"?
Hi aiweelie,
"we" meant nothing special.
I simply had in mind the 288 users who read this topic at the exact time I wrote this sentence
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login