Another g4p star arrested
-
-
@frostycab you need a nap, mate
-
@tnar Hmm...yep I guess they do as long as they're making money from them.
-
@frostycab Err umm...don't really follow your reply to be honest...what has it got to do with my post ?
-
Now there is an update to this story ...check the link below ...
-
OFFICIAL STAFF STATEMENT
EDIT - This is not directed at anyone specific, but a general statement based on past events.
Please do not ask to have his videos banned, as we will not do that based on his personal life.
We only ban videos, etc when the person has committed some crime in their video, etc.
If someone does something you don't like in the real world, and their videos, etc offend you now, ignore them and move on to another torrent.
Thanks for your understanding.
-
@raphjd Was I asking for anything?? All I'm doing or was doing, was posting a news article about a porn actor that had done something naughty.
-
It wasn't directed at you, but any time a topic like this comes up, we get demands to ban their videos.
-
@Playmate The point @frostycab was making - which I agree with, tbh - is that when you post just a link, anyone wanting to view it has to click on it. For many, this will involve hurdles such as age verification and changing VPN location to be able to do so.
This will put many people off bothering to follow the link, and means that everyone who does may have to each jump through these hoops.
If you take a screenshot of the article and post it as a picture, that's instantly viewable to everyone without further effort. There's no reason why you couldn't post both, for example if it's a long article that's difficult to screenshot in one hit. You then simply add: "Read the full article here", or similar.
-
@frostycab you need a nap, mate
@frostycab Err umm...don't really follow your reply to be honest...what has it got to do with my post ?
I genuinely have no ida how the hell I managed to post that on here. LOL I must admit I was going a bit cross-eyed last night, so maybe it was in my clipboard and I meant to put it somewhere else. Please ignore
-
@Playmate The point @frostycab was making - which I agree with, tbh - is that when you post just a link, anyone wanting to view it has to click on it. For many, this will involve hurdles such as age verification and changing VPN location to be able to do so.
This will put many people off bothering to follow the link, and means that everyone who does may have to each jump through these hoops.
If you take a screenshot of the article and post it as a picture, that's instantly viewable to everyone without further effort. There's no reason why you couldn't post both, for example if it's a long article that's difficult to screenshot in one hit. You then simply add: "Read the full article here", or similar.
Nope, it was me being far too tired and not looking what I was doing.
-
@Kevin4fm Hmm. well now that you say all that, I doubt I will bother posting links or even posting. I've only had this problem a couple of times, one for a porn download site, and once for a phone app.... of having to put my age verification in to sites similar to where I got the news link from originally. The site I got the article from was not a porn site, and no age verification was or is needed.
I do understand it might put people off where there is just a link, but to screenshot the article just doesn't make it of interest either I guess. Guess it's just the world we live in now...Thanks for your input and explanation anyway. and cheers to those that were interested enough to read and or comment.
-
@Playmate The hurdles may well not apply to this particular link, especially as it's a non-porn site. But others may not know that when they just see a link and dismiss it without even trying. It's also easy to forget others may face impediments that you don't, because they're one-off hurdles that you dealt with ages ago and no longer need worry about.
A lot depends on where you're located. In the UK, it's becoming mandatory for sites to require age verification. I don't just mean porn sites, but social media sites, etc. too. I'm not totally up-to-date with the current state, but it seems the next logical step that ALL sites be required to have age verification gates. After all, there's no way of knowing until you get there what they contain.
-
@Playmate The hurdles may well not apply to this particular link, especially as it's a non-porn site. But others may not know that when they just see a link and dismiss it without even trying. It's also easy to forget others may face impediments that you don't, because they're one-off hurdles that you dealt with ages ago and no longer need worry about.
A lot depends on where you're located. In the UK, it's becoming mandatory for sites to require age verification. I don't just mean porn sites, but social media sites, etc. too. I'm not totally up-to-date with the current state, but it seems the next logical step that ALL sites be required to have age verification gates. After all, there's no way of knowing until you get there what they contain.
Yup, it's an utter shitshow here, especially when you see news about government-approved verification providers announcing they've had data breaches.
-
sad to see someone getting this low
-
sad to see someone getting this low
how is this "getting low" bro he's just a rich kid and this is what they all look like at their peak
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login