Hmm.. are these guys hot? Who are they?
-
Should I download this 137 GB monster collection?
Here is the image posted for it. I think those are humans next to the pickup truck.
-
I would not.
-
Any close-up images? seems interesting enough
-
R raphjd marked this topic as a question on
-
@Kekkaishi I was pointing out that someone posted a torrent that is 137 GB.. with completely worthless images.
-
It's look like Gulliver in Lilliput - porn version
-
Looks like it'll be a load of crap from fixed cameras where you can't really see very much at all, but since @lololulu19 neglected to let any interested parties know what it is the torrent can be found here:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=017ecb4d1cd1dd9431aab4170a5875fb2bd3beecefe49332 -
@frostycab I did not want anybody to accidentally download this torrent, and waste 137 gb of points!
-
@lololulu19 actually, if you go to the torrent and zoom in on the photos (+ icon) 3-4 times, the quality isn't too bad and you can see what's going on in most of them - the ones that aren't overly dark.
It's not my thing, but I can see enough in the photos provided to tell what it is. -
For thumbnails : large images per [columns and rows] ...
[The key difference between columns and rows is that a column arranges data vertically from top to bottom,
while a row arranges data horizontally from left to right.
ex : 3x3 = 9, 3x4/[4x3] = 12, 4x4 = 16 are acceptable ... Unfortunately text details below are too small ...
However : small images per [columns and rows]
ex : 3x9 = 27 [2x] are so lame and obvious ... sometimes they use all available squares ??? [large/small] What's the point ...
This has been discussed here [many times] ...
SEE : https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/62914/using-thumbnail-maker-for-large-torrents/9In addition a 137 GB of torrents will devastate and or ruin your ratio if you're not aware on these ...
There's no point of downloading huge amount of bogus torrent w/o proper descriptions and source details ...
Unless you can get a refund ...
-
@john32123666 also, each picture in the "collage" should be unique. These collages tend to be mostly images that are taken just a second apart... which makes no sense
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login