• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Scottish government banned from redefining "woman"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LGBT News
    6 Posts 3 Posters 47 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjdR Offline
      raphjd Forum Administrator
      last edited by

      The Court of Session (Scotland's highest civil court) ruled yesterday that the Scottish government did not have the power to redefine "woman" to include trans-women.

      Technically, the lawsuit only covered the definition of "woman" but it also includes the definition of "man".

      FOf5B2NX0AMhYZ0.jpg

      bi4smoothB C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bi4smoothB Offline
        bi4smooth @raphjd
        last edited by bi4smooth

        @raphjd said in Scottish government banned from redefining "woman":

        The Court of Session (Scotland's highest civil court) ruled yesterday that the Scottish government did not have the power to redefine "woman" to include trans-women.

        Technically, the lawsuit only covered the definition of "woman" but it also includes the definition of "man".

        A victory - albeit short-lived - for transphobes the whole world over, I'm sure!

        Of course, courts have a long history of stemming the tide of social change! Right, Dred Scott? 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • C Offline
          csme9000 @raphjd
          last edited by

          @raphjd My question becomes, can they ever redefine the term to include trans women? Does it need to come from a vote of the people, or particular legislation?

          raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • raphjdR Offline
            raphjd Forum Administrator @csme9000
            last edited by

            @csme9000

            As I understand it, only the UK government can change it.

            bi4smoothB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • bi4smoothB Offline
              bi4smooth @raphjd
              last edited by

              @raphjd

              Actually, the use of the word to describe a female human can be re-defined by "society" long before any legislative body gets around to it! And word "definitions" come from common use, not legislatures!

              To wit:

              • Actors used to be male, as there was Actress for women... no more: they're all Actors
              • Literal (literally) used to mean one thing (as opposed to "figuratively"), but now it means BOTH - because people came to use the phrase incorrectly so much ("I am literally sweating my balls off here!" - I don't think so!)
              raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • raphjdR Offline
                raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth
                last edited by

                @bi4smooth

                But that's not what the lawsuit was about. The court didn't rule on society changing the definition, but the Scottish government changing the definition.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post