But that's not what the lawsuit was about. The court didn't rule on society changing the definition, but the Scottish government changing the definition.

Actually, the use of the word to describe a female human can be re-defined by "society" long before any legislative body gets around to it! And word "definitions" come from common use, not legislatures!

To wit:

• Actors used to be male, as there was Actress for women... no more: they're all Actors
• Literal (literally) used to mean one thing (as opposed to "figuratively"), but now it means BOTH - because people came to use the phrase incorrectly so much ("I am literally sweating my balls off here!" - I don't think so!)

As I understand it, only the UK government can change it.

The Court of Session (Scotland's highest civil court) ruled yesterday that the Scottish government did not have the power to redefine "woman" to include trans-women.

Technically, the lawsuit only covered the definition of "woman" but it also includes the definition of "man".

A victory - albeit short-lived - for transphobes the whole world over, I'm sure!

Of course, courts have a long history of stemming the tide of social change! Right, Dred Scott?