CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine
-
So you claim that your dr knows more about the Pfizer shot than Pfizer.
WOW, just fucking WOW!!!
-
@raphjd said in CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine:
So you claim that your dr knows more about the Pfizer shot than Pfizer.
WOW, just fucking WOW!!!
Want to know what's wow? You repeatedly trying (and failing) to tell me what I just said!
Did you mean to put your dick in your mouth?
I said I trust my Dr over Politicians - I didn't say anything about Pfizer.
I happen to think (though I haven't researched it yet - so I haven't commented yet) that your claim that Pfizer itself does not recommend it's COVID-19 vaccine for adolescents is incorrect... so, I haven't commented on that yet.I didn't say anything about your claim that Pfizer doesn't recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12-18.
I don't know, has repeating myself three times driven home the point?
I am not the straw man you're looking for... and I decline the invitation to become one!
-
You said you trust your doctor when he recommended the Pfizer shot for your under 18 son.
The J&J shot causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome but you would trust your doctor if he said to get it.
I guess your dentist also recommends full-mouth tooth extraction because teeth can get cavities.
We already know your vet recommends xylitol for dogs who need to lose weight.
That has nothing to do with your extreme TDS or maybe it does, how knows with you liberals. You made it about politics, so let's run with it.
-
@raphjd said in CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine:
You said you trust your doctor when he recommended the Pfizer shot for your under 18 son.
The J&J shot causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome but you would trust your doctor if he said to get it.
I guess your dentist also recommends full-mouth tooth extraction because teeth can get cavities.
We already know your vet recommends xylitol for dogs who need to lose weight.
That has nothing to do with your extreme TDS or maybe it does, how knows with you liberals. You made it about politics, so let's run with it.
You are such an expert at creating and then burning a straw-man!
The problem is, it's all data you make up!When you wake up in the morning and put your feet on the bathroom floor, you are taking a risk (those tile floors can become VERY slippery when wet - and that's what bathroom floors are designed for: getting wet!)
If you want a vaccine that has zero side-effects on anyone who takes it, you'll have to wait for another 50 years or so - when they'll be able to "design" the vaccine for your own personal, unique, DNA. That ain't today!
You do realize that the original Polio vaccines in the mid-1950s actually CAUSED Polio (and death from it) in a tiny percentage of people who took it? Yet, people in the 1950's and 1960's lined up to get the shot - and Polio was all-but-wiped-out. (And some small number of people did actually die because of the vaccine itself).
A tiny percentage of children have adverse reactions to the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine every year.... yet, parents (and school systems) around the world still line up to get nearly all children that shot as well.
If you applied the same level of fear mongering and hyperbole to the act of driving, you'd be running around with your hair on fire trying to stop people from dying on the streets!
Back to the point:
My doctor did recommend that my son take the Pfizer vaccine - and he did, and he's had no side effects (other than, presumably, being better prepared to fight off the COVID virus, should he encounter it). That recommendation echoed the CDC and FDA recommendations. Again, if there is a Pfizer recommendation against it, I haven't seen it.
And even more to the point:
I expect, and depend on my Dr to know the truth about these things - and to separate the "wheat from the chaff" with all the dis-information being spread. If my Dr was not a better interpreter of this information than I am, then I wouldn't need her as a Dr, would I? I'd just do it all myself. (Sorry, I have a certain amount of hubris - but nowhere near that amount!)
RE: The J&J shot (and the others like it that use the older, "dead virus" vaccine technology)
I have recommended to my friends and family that they take a pass on that one, and choose one of the mRNA versions instead.The rest of your hyperbolic firestorm of assholery isn't worth responding to... that straw-man doesn't exist, except in your deepest psyche...
-
So, your doctor knows more than the WHO.
You might remember that you told us that we need to trust them, in the early days, because they were the experts.
K, thanks but no thanks. I don't need liberal mental gymnastics from a societal lock stepping "libertarian".
-
@raphjd said in CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine:
So, your doctor knows more than the WHO.
You might remember that you told us that we need to trust them, in the early days, because they were the experts.
K, thanks but no thanks. I don't need liberal mental gymnastics from a societal lock stepping "libertarian".
Nice pic...
I don't know that the WHO has come out saying that the Pfizer vaccine shouldn't be given to adolescents...
But again, regardless of the straw-man argument you want to create against it, it is simple:
I trust my Dr - not without question, but in general - more than I trust any TV "talking head"
And if you don't feel the same about YOUR Doctor, you need a new Doctor!
-
The WHO has said that NO ONE UNDER 18 should be given any of the current vaccines. We have discussed this here before. The WHO and the CDC/NIH conflict on this, so whose science do we follow? Ring any bells?
We talked about the guy who pioneered the mRNA vaccine who got scrubbed from LinkedIn for siding with the WHO, not the CDC.
Clearly, you have no idea how the NHS works. We get the doctor they assign us. Sometimes you get the same doctor all/most of the time and other times you get whatever random doctor that is available.
-
@raphjd said in CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine:
The WHO has said that NO ONE UNDER 18 should be given any of the current vaccines. We have discussed this here before. The WHO and the CDC/NIH conflict on this, so whose science do we follow? Ring any bells?
We talked about the guy who pioneered the mRNA vaccine who got scrubbed from LinkedIn for siding with the WHO, not the CDC.
Clearly, you have no idea how the NHS works. We get the doctor they assign us. Sometimes you get the same doctor all/most of the time and other times you get whatever random doctor that is available.
The UK's NHS is not what I'm talking about, and is a clear example of why the US should NOT adopt that model. The issue you raise with the British NHS is exactly why the Dems kept saying "You can keep your Dr" in all the Obamacare debates (even tho it was - at least partly - an absolute lie (they weren't just wrong, they KNEW that MANY people would NOT be able to keep their Drs!).
Shocker! Stop the presses! Politicians LIED!
However, you should read a little farther in the WHO report: they say children under 18 (12-18 in the US) shouldn't get the shot... not because they won't work, or are dangerous - but because the WHO wants those vaccines distributed to other countries where more at-risk people are dying.
Not a medical question, a Public Health one - and the NIH/CDC are focused on the US issues, not the world-wide issues... no shocker in those reports.
Once again, you've screamed FIRE! ... and we've discovered little more than a match.
-
Based on CDC numbers;
Once again, more kids have gotten Myocarditis from the Pfizer vaccine than have died from C-19.
Likewise, more kids have gotten GBS from the J&J vaccine than have died from C-19.
The same applies to other problems the various vaccines are causing in kids. Add al that shit up and we see the "cure" is more dangerous for kids than the disease.
It's funny how the vaccines are causing more harm in kids than C-19.
Also, your beloved CDC is a wing of the DNC.
The NIH is run by a dirty-ass "scientist" who said that GOF research is worth a global pandemic or 2. It gets banned in the US, so he weasels it out through Bill Gate's Eco-Health in Wuhan. And here we are.
-
...
The page was updated June 22 to include a June 15 advisory from the WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts that concluded the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe for anyone age 12 or older.WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic told USA TODAY that children ages 12-15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups.
"Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers," Jasarevic said via email.
The WHO has explained that vaccine supply is scarce in certain countries, which is why the agency made this recommendation.
... -
AH, so the change was fairly recent.
I mean, they for some reason, could not make it clear for the previous year.
Let's not forget that the WHO has also played politics with C-19.
-
@raphjd said in CDC: 397 Children Suffered Heart Inflammation After COVID-19 Vaccine:
AH, so the change was fairly recent.
I mean, they for some reason, could not make it clear for the previous year.
Let's not forget that the WHO has also played politics with C-19.
I'm sorry, but your characterization of the NIH, CDC, and WHO as making many of their public-health decisions based entirely for political reasons is myopic, cynical as f**k, and hyperbolic. - In other words, just like most of your other preposterous claims! LOL
All 3 of these organizations are primarily staffed (though not necessarily LED) by SCIENTISTS who are seeking facts and truth, not political points. The politicians they support are the ones that give them the money to do their research. Most of these scientists are so focused on the science - not the politics. And sometimes they actually DO overlook the bad ways their discoveries can be used - because to them, knowledge is the goal... the ONLY goal.
I will repeat: the Moderna mRNA technology was being developed pre-COVID-19 as a potential treatment or vaccine against HIV. That research continues, and so - with the extreme success rate seen with the re-tooling for COVID-19 - the hope for something that works as a defense against HIV is there and palpable.
Of course, those results will be politicized - but while the politicians argue, the scientists will go back to work figuring out the NEXT BIG THING.... because that is what they do!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login