Aussie Heartthrob Brenton Thwaites Reveals He's Bisexual??
-
Is this him?
Twink or not, I wouldn't kick him out of bed for being covered in sand….
-
Im an Aussie born and bred and i have never heard of him
-
Yay ;D
-
yay! at least he's not pretending
-
Zac Efron is NOT a twink, in fact never was, even counting his High School Musical days.
-
I seems to me that almost everyone is Bi these days. Why not, the best of both worlds. Take us back to the Roman days, married to a woman and men on the side.
-
That sure is one hot beach picture of him displaying his highly alluring personal pointer.
I wish we could all believe that Mr. T is bi, but I believe that assumes facts not in evidence. With no other data on hand, he could just as easily have been pranking the interview to see how she would respond, or hinting at being something he is so absolutely NOT that the mere suggestion would seem hilarious. To him.
The question certainly seems to have had a spontaneous answer, though he is not the first to be asked to describe his fantasy fuck in some detail (though not asked so crudely). It could as well have been prepared. It might well have come up before leaving him puzzling for how to respond in some memorable and thoroughly dismissive way without actually saying, "That's a really dumb question."
Whether he has standards and ideals for partners of either sex is not a settled matter for me, but what is at least abundantly clear is that he doesn't give a shit what people think that answer means about how "masculine" and "normal" (inhibited), and "str8" he is. And, as I have just attempted, perhaps rather incoherently, to argue at considerable length earlier today, the more people who embrace (even just defiantly and for sensational effect or political impact) gay sex and gay rights and aggressively act as if it's perfectly all right to have gay encounters, the less repressed, unhappy, suicidal, and (gasp) unlaid everyone can be, leading to less suffering from blueballs and clogged pipes because long-term or short-term same-sex relationships are perfectly ordinary. Unremarkable. "Nothing to see here. Move on." Even just talking about such things as nonchalantly as Mr. T. did in this case, even without actual private practice of the principle, indicates that being willing and able to choose the sex of your partner (Woody Allen said that "doubles your chances of a date on Saturday night) completely acceptable in the "not that there's anything wrong with that" Seinfeld mode of acceptance.
My rant is here
https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=37845.0
You might at least be interested in the link to a couple of photos of Mr. Jonas and his attractively draped trousers that I just posted.
Greeks also believed in m/f coupling with men on the side. In the Middle Ages, marriage had nothing to do with love. You were betrothed appropriately by your parents for considerations like money, position, and property. All those Golliard poets teaching the now standardly accepted signs of True Love– sighing, moping, loss of appetite-- that was stuff they invented, but the sentiments were not for husbands and wives to share with each other.
Around the time of the American revolution, Pride and Prejudice appeared, with a bevy of unwed daughters to foist upon someone, preferably with out the little slip's objection. Courting and dating under the evil eye of chaperons was hardly to encourage tender feelings, but rather to prevent such feelings from being acted on. Which is why in Victorian England, maybe half a century later, the men all politely sat still for such fustian pretense and then stopped at a local whorehouse to relieve the stress. There was one on nearly every corner in those days, and very useful and practical it was, too.
Don't know why anyone ever let "the fairer sex" ("Fairer! Huh! As if.) take away such sensible outlets for the needs of the less fair with their craven animal appetites for procreative-type activities. They might as well have shut down taverns because you could get food and drink there-- more sensual appetites, and equally necessary, but.... Well, eventually they did shut down the bars, at least in the U.S., making a lot of unsavory people rich (and/or dead) and generally lowering the quality of booze and sending any remaining "good stuff" into hiding. My brand new corollary to Gresham's Law: Cheap, bad booze drives good stuff off the market. You read it here first.
-
He's gorgeous x
-
Here are more photos of Brenton. . .
-
That sure is one hot beach picture of him displaying his highly alluring personal pointer.
I wish we could all believe that Mr. T is bi, but I believe that assumes facts not in evidence. With no other data on hand, he could just as easily have been pranking the interview to see how she would respond, or hinting at being something he is so absolutely NOT that the mere suggestion would seem hilarious. To him.
The question certainly seems to have had a spontaneous answer, though he is not the first to be asked to describe his fantasy fuck in some detail (though not asked so crudely). It could as well have been prepared. It might well have come up before leaving him puzzling for how to respond in some memorable and thoroughly dismissive way without actually saying, "That's a really dumb question."
Whether he has standards and ideals for partners of either sex is not a settled matter for me, but what is at least abundantly clear is that he doesn't give a shit what people think that answer means about how "masculine" and "normal" (inhibited), and "str8" he is. And, as I have just attempted, perhaps rather incoherently, to argue at considerable length earlier today, the more people who embrace (even just defiantly and for sensational effect or political impact) gay sex and gay rights and aggressively act as if it's perfectly all right to have gay encounters, the less repressed, unhappy, suicidal, and (gasp) unlaid everyone can be, leading to less suffering from blueballs and clogged pipes because long-term or short-term same-sex relationships are perfectly ordinary. Unremarkable. "Nothing to see here. Move on." Even just talking about such things as nonchalantly as Mr. T. did in this case, even without actual private practice of the principle, indicates that being willing and able to choose the sex of your partner (Woody Allen said that "doubles your chances of a date on Saturday night) completely acceptable in the "not that there's anything wrong with that" Seinfeld mode of acceptance.
My rant is here
https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=37845.0
You might at least be interested in the link to a couple of photos of Mr. Jonas and his attractively draped trousers that I just posted.
Greeks also believed in m/f coupling with men on the side. In the Middle Ages, marriage had nothing to do with love. You were betrothed appropriately by your parents for considerations like money, position, and property. All those Golliard poets teaching the now standardly accepted signs of True Love– sighing, moping, loss of appetite-- that was stuff they invented, but the sentiments were not for husbands and wives to share with each other.
Around the time of the American revolution, Pride and Prejudice appeared, with a bevy of unwed daughters to foist upon someone, preferably with out the little slip's objection. Courting and dating under the evil eye of chaperons was hardly to encourage tender feelings, but rather to prevent such feelings from being acted on. Which is why in Victorian England, maybe half a century later, the men all politely sat still for such fustian pretense and then stopped at a local whorehouse to relieve the stress. There was one on nearly every corner in those days, and very useful and practical it was, too.
Don't know why anyone ever let "the fairer sex" ("Fairer! Huh! As if.) take away such sensible outlets for the needs of the less fair with their craven animal appetites for procreative-type activities. They might as well have shut down taverns because you could get food and drink there-- more sensual appetites, and equally necessary, but.... Well, eventually they did shut down the bars, at least in the U.S., making a lot of unsavory people rich (and/or dead) and generally lowering the quality of booze and sending any remaining "good stuff" into hiding. My brand new corollary to Gresham's Law: Cheap, bad booze drives good stuff off the market. You read it here first.
Not to mention that is is perfectly fine to engage in gay and same-sex sex acts as well. We are on the right side.
-
cool :cheesy2:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login