That sure is one hot beach picture of him displaying his highly alluring personal pointer.

I wish we could all believe that Mr. T is bi, but I believe that assumes facts not in evidence. With no other data on hand, he could just as easily have been pranking the interview to see how she would respond, or hinting at being something he is so absolutely NOT that the mere suggestion would seem hilarious. To him.

The question certainly seems to have had a spontaneous answer, though he is not the first to be asked to describe his fantasy fuck in some detail (though not asked so crudely). It could as well have been prepared. It might well have come up before leaving him puzzling for how to respond in some memorable and thoroughly dismissive way without actually saying, "That's a really dumb question."

Whether he has standards and ideals for partners of either sex is not a settled matter for me, but what is at least abundantly clear is that he doesn't give a shit what people think that answer means about how "masculine" and "normal" (inhibited), and "str8" he is. And, as I have just attempted, perhaps rather incoherently, to argue at considerable length earlier today, the more people who embrace (even just defiantly and for sensational effect or political impact) gay sex and gay rights and aggressively act as if it's perfectly all right to have gay encounters, the less repressed, unhappy, suicidal, and (gasp) unlaid everyone can be, leading to less suffering from blueballs and clogged pipes because long-term or short-term same-sex relationships are perfectly ordinary. Unremarkable. "Nothing to see here. Move on." Even just talking about such things as nonchalantly as Mr. T. did in this case, even without actual private practice of the principle, indicates that being willing and able to choose the sex of your partner (Woody Allen said that "doubles your chances of a date on Saturday night) completely acceptable in the "not that there's anything wrong with that" Seinfeld mode of acceptance.

My rant is here

https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=37845.0

You might at least be interested in the link to a couple of photos of Mr. Jonas and his attractively draped trousers that I just posted.

Greeks also believed in m/f coupling with men on the side. In the Middle Ages, marriage had nothing to do with love. You were betrothed appropriately by your parents for considerations like money, position, and property. All those Golliard poets teaching the now standardly accepted signs of True Love– sighing, moping, loss of appetite-- that was stuff they invented, but the sentiments were not for husbands and wives to share with each other.

Around the time of the American revolution, Pride and Prejudice appeared, with a bevy of unwed daughters to foist upon someone, preferably with out the little slip's objection. Courting and dating under the evil eye of chaperons was hardly to encourage tender feelings, but rather to prevent such feelings from being acted on. Which is why in Victorian England, maybe half a century later, the men all politely sat still for such fustian pretense and then stopped at a local whorehouse to relieve the stress. There was one on nearly every corner in those days, and very useful and practical it was, too.

Don't know why anyone ever let "the fairer sex" ("Fairer! Huh! As if.) take away such sensible outlets for the needs of the less fair with their craven animal appetites for procreative-type activities. They might as well have shut down taverns because you could get food and drink there-- more sensual appetites, and equally necessary, but.... Well, eventually they did shut down the bars, at least in the U.S., making a lot of unsavory people rich (and/or dead) and generally lowering the quality of booze and sending any remaining "good stuff" into hiding. My brand new corollary to Gresham's Law: Cheap, bad booze drives good stuff off the market. You read it here first.

Not to mention that is is perfectly fine to engage in gay and same-sex sex acts as well. We are on the right side.

I wish we could all believe that Mr. T is bi, but I believe that assumes facts not in evidence. With no other data on hand, he could just as easily have been pranking the interview to see how she would respond, or hinting at being something he is so absolutely NOT that the mere suggestion would seem hilarious. To him.

The question certainly seems to have had a spontaneous answer, though he is not the first to be asked to describe his fantasy fuck in some detail (though not asked so crudely). It could as well have been prepared. It might well have come up before leaving him puzzling for how to respond in some memorable and thoroughly dismissive way without actually saying, "That's a really dumb question."

Whether he has standards and ideals for partners of either sex is not a settled matter for me, but what is at least abundantly clear is that he doesn't give a shit what people think that answer means about how "masculine" and "normal" (inhibited), and "str8" he is. And, as I have just attempted, perhaps rather incoherently, to argue at considerable length earlier today, the more people who embrace (even just defiantly and for sensational effect or political impact) gay sex and gay rights and aggressively act as if it's perfectly all right to have gay encounters, the less repressed, unhappy, suicidal, and (gasp) unlaid everyone can be, leading to less suffering from blueballs and clogged pipes because long-term or short-term same-sex relationships are perfectly ordinary. Unremarkable. "Nothing to see here. Move on." Even just talking about such things as nonchalantly as Mr. T. did in this case, even without actual private practice of the principle, indicates that being willing and able to choose the sex of your partner (Woody Allen said that "doubles your chances of a date on Saturday night) completely acceptable in the "not that there's anything wrong with that" Seinfeld mode of acceptance.

My rant is here

https://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=37845.0

You might at least be interested in the link to a couple of photos of Mr. Jonas and his attractively draped trousers that I just posted.

Greeks also believed in m/f coupling with men on the side. In the Middle Ages, marriage had nothing to do with love. You were betrothed appropriately by your parents for considerations like money, position, and property. All those Golliard poets teaching the now standardly accepted signs of True Love– sighing, moping, loss of appetite-- that was stuff they invented, but the sentiments were not for husbands and wives to share with each other.

Around the time of the American revolution, Pride and Prejudice appeared, with a bevy of unwed daughters to foist upon someone, preferably with out the little slip's objection. Courting and dating under the evil eye of chaperons was hardly to encourage tender feelings, but rather to prevent such feelings from being acted on. Which is why in Victorian England, maybe half a century later, the men all politely sat still for such fustian pretense and then stopped at a local whorehouse to relieve the stress. There was one on nearly every corner in those days, and very useful and practical it was, too.

Don't know why anyone ever let "the fairer sex" ("Fairer! Huh! As if.) take away such sensible outlets for the needs of the less fair with their craven animal appetites for procreative-type activities. They might as well have shut down taverns because you could get food and drink there-- more sensual appetites, and equally necessary, but.... Well, eventually they did shut down the bars, at least in the U.S., making a lot of unsavory people rich (and/or dead) and generally lowering the quality of booze and sending any remaining "good stuff" into hiding. My brand new corollary to Gresham's Law: Cheap, bad booze drives good stuff off the market. You read it here first.

Twink or not, I wouldn't kick him out of bed for being covered in sand….

Yes, he's a heartthrob. No matter how twinky he is (thrilled that he's open about his sexuality, by the way).

Twinks (or at least what many gay men would define as twinks) comprise a pretty hefty chunk of the current "heartthrob" stock out there right now. Pick up any of those teeny girly magazines (like Tiger Beat, Teen Bop, etcetera .... I remember sneaking those from my sister when I was 13 years old and being in heaven) and look at the kind of guys they're turning into the centerfolds.

None of them are any Vin Diesel ... I'll just say that.  :laugh:

Twinks
Body Type: Thin, smooth, often blond, usually with longish bangs and often with highlights.
Description: This young breed of gays is never over 30 and tends to be on the queeny side and hews closely to the conventional stereotypes of gay man. Wild, ornery, and still getting over their coming out issues, the twink is the gay gone wild, and is bait to older men who are into trying to suck off their youthful energy.
Subcategories: The Twunk, the Gay-sian, the A&F boy.
New York City Hang Out: Rush, Campus Thursdays at Splash
Diva of Choice: Lady Gaga
Preoccupations: Fashion, drama, partying, hooking up, college, coming out
Top or Bottom: Bottom
Celebrity Example: Zac Efron

I disagree with that definition.

It covers "frat" and "jock" which are separate groups.  A&F models fit into these groups, but mainly the "frat".

Twinks are 21 and under, with slender, usually undefined bodies.

@nordicblue:

He looks like a twink.

You say that like it's a bad thing, and that it's mutually exclusive with being a "heartthrob." 

because it is.

He looks like a twink.

You say that like it's a bad thing, and that it's mutually exclusive with being a "heartthrob." 

He's definitely hot.

Brenton's response? "Male or female?"