I rarely watched the show when it aired but I was surprised by how much I enjoyed this. It would interesting to see what a new Will and Grace would be like without the network restrictions of the 1990s and 2000s.

He is ugly and apparently unable to find someone his own age who will agree to fuck him. [image: 98907_yenni-768x477%5B1%5D.jpg]

@kinky4play: So much misinformation as usual. Where to begin. A large number of the "anti-trump" protesters were actually the local anarchist who are very common in the NW region. They joined the protest strictly to cause damage and had nothing to do with the actual protest. The one story about this (all the rest were just repeats of the original story) stated that "they didn't vote.. in Oregon". Many of the protesters were from Washington State, the border being a 10 minute drive from Portland. A large number of protesters were college age and therefore vote in their permanent state of residence, not the one they may be attending school in. 3rd party fact checking sites view the original claim as "unproven" at best It's also interesting that the vast majority of damage and harassment since the election has been towards the minority communities including many attacks on LGBT people. I still can't understand why an LGBT person could support a Neo-Nazi group, but then I remember there were actually gay men in the upper ranks of the Nazi regime of Hitler. 1.  Ok, so how do you explain the other riots that weren't in the NW? 2.  HUH?  Are you saying the links talking about other cities with riots were actually talking about Portland?  If Portland was part of the article, it doesn't mean the entire article was only about Portland. 3.  You need to prove this, because you can register in either.  At least that was the case back when I was in the Marine Corps and college. 4.  I hope you aren't claiming Snopes as a fact checking source.

@alibix: @Loki100: @raphjd: :police:  You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll.   :police: Care to show me where, considering it isn't in your posted rules? It also seems quite a little self serving, might I ask just how often you are accused of trolling? @raphjd: Those are my posts, whether you like it or not.     And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling. Okay fine. Let's play the debunk game. You said, "Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses." Due process is fairly specific to the US, and pertains to US laws. College campuses don't pass laws, so they can't actually infringe upon due process. What college campuses do is have policies, which are enacted through various bureaucratic processes. Of course then you have to acknowledge that each college is its own unique institution with its own unique set of policies, and massive variation between them. And since you didn't actually name a college, we can't actually look up what its policies actually are. So what you actually mean is, "Some college boards/presidents/administrators have enacted policies that _feel are unfairly biased in favor of the victims of sexual assault." Which is a very, very, very long way from your initial statement. @raphjd: I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts.    If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply. :police:  You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem.  If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums.   :police: Actually you didn't. Note again that you didn't actually name a college. And if you at everything else you have posted, it is similarly long on claims, short of facts to actually examine. These people are professional victims. There's no use trying to reason with them. They jack themselves sore to crazy feminists on tumblr each night to confirm their worldview. There's nothing you can do to help. LOL.  How sad are you? Again, another feminist who can't debunk a single thing I said so it's the well worn name calling. _

@Bearloch: I see a new Adolf Hitler coming within the decade.White people will only be pushed so far. It won't go that far, but whites will be pushed further and further to the right. I do love the "Suck It Up, Buttercup" bill in Iowa.  I think it should be a federal law.

@Loki100: @raphjd: AGAIN, if you people really think what you are doing is so good, then why do you need to hide your faces?!   Why do you need to assault the media who is covering what you are doing in a public space?! And this is the perfect example of exactly what I was talking about (in fact, I noticed it earlier, but felt the sheer hypocrisy of someone in the LGBT community being anti-rioting was more important to point out). Literally no one was talking about this. You brought it up out of no where, it doesn't apply to anyone here (nor to the conversation). You don't even proffer a context to make sense of it. Just an accusation hurled around, because you picked it up in the comments section on a right-wing website. This is textbook troll behavior. @raphjd: Stonewall was completely different from an election.   And as you seem to ignore, the Stonewall rioters didn't cover their faces.  Nor did they use "injustice" as a reason to loot. Wow. You really are ignorant. Just because you weren't talking about it doesn't mean it can't be talked about or that it has no relavence on this topic. It does fit here because they are SJWs just like you.  You guys claim you are the good guys yet you need to cover your faces, while looting in the name of injustice. There are countless videos on the internet to show exactly what I'm talking about. If you want to talk about "ignorance", then we need to talk about SJWs who can't provide any evidence to support their claims and just name call or physically abuse people, like pouring a bottle of piss on a reporter's head and then running away.

The prime minister of luxembourg

He is a fake libertarian and a dope.

@TheNewt: How are Hillary and Bill viewed in Mexico and Central America? Do people there realize how they are racist and do not like immigrants from Mexico and Central America and how even Hillary wanted to build a wall or fence between the United States southwest border and Mexico? NAFTA is a bad thing for pretty much everyone, even here in the United States. When the Lewinsky scandal broke up Bill was regarded as a dirty man and some regarded Hillary as a subservient wife, willing to suffer the shame due to political power. Of course, this is Mexico so when you find someone worse, the others practically become 'angels' to the masses. I don't know if the Clintons are racists or not but I can get why they don't like immigrants (illegal immigrants) after all, they suck part of the state funds and give nothing in return since they don't pay taxes. Mexico actually needs the NAFTA because USA is the main consumer of mexican goods and the governments never tried to build relationships as strong with other countries. Right now there's a Trump-hate bandwagon in Mexico, and honestly I'm fed up with it.  And honestly in most mexican eyes the illegal immigrants are traitors for leaving the country but now they think of them as martyrs due to the Trump agenda (and because Mexico gets a huge income from their money transfers in yummy green dollars)

I guess it was too much work to fact-check that HE did have a faulty microphone, huh?

Ok, so you don't read any of your links.  That explains why you have no idea what I'm talking about.

UMMM, at about 2:10 he praises Lindsey Graham but claims Trump is a homophobe?!  How fucking clueless is this guy? Sorry, but he's an idiot and doesn't deserve my time.

and the facts you have are 100% true ? Again not all "facts" are true … since most studies are made in a lot of institutions that want to pass it's own agenda . I have no problem with meeting in the middle of things in social climates ... You say why do i want a rooms full of stuffed toys and Disney films ?? i never said that nor i care what the felicities schools Provide . but if it's ok with the school to have a room full of films and toys , why not ?? That does not effect anyone in anyway live and let live . and you can not be biased with saying that some MRA are bad  but all feminists are  ... like all groups there are extremist and some people just join in on the fence of things even if they don't believe in it  . And rape can happen to anyone and by everyone regardless of gender . Men have the biggest part of the blame in why people think that men can't be attacked ... as they will ridicule you if you said that you are attacked by a woman in any shape of form .... i think that is not fair . IF the feminists movement didn't happen , a lot of woman wouldn't be able to vote now or even works in some jobs .. in India they believe that not because of woman's right .. it's because that they think a woman can NOT hurt men .. it is not progressed enough to Touch on social issues such as this ,also know that lot of countries is still undeveloped in human rights ... especially if the country has a sever poverty problem . anyhow i think we are getting out of the main subject here ... and i'm getting lost on what we were talking in the first place ,lets agree to disagree .

I can't believe we haven't seen a tape  yet.

I think Hilary gave a very back handed compliment praising his children rather then him.

Even more than that, since every illegal is a criminal by very virtue of being here.

?????? What ? So how can other countries including American legalise gay marriage WITHOUT a plebiscite but we can't? Did their nation have to vote on that issue? I'm not forcing anyone to agree with me at all. Do you not see the disrespect that our community needs to go through in this day and age? Where other countries don't even have to vote to get 'married'. So should we have to vote to see if a man and a woman can get married? DID WE VOTE to get the marriage act changed to between a man and a woman ? Where was the democracy in that??? Hello ?????????? You cannot be serious mate. And I didn't vote LIBERAL because I agree with their stance on gay marriage. I voted for them because I believe OVERALL in their management of the country. Noone will always support their party of choice 100% Personally, I don't care about marriage but if my fellow mates want to get married and have it recognised - AND BE EQUAL - to everyone else then so be it.

What a lunatic. Never heard of him and I hope I will never again.