@aadam101: Trump has flip flopped again.  Trump has now decided that to reinstate the embargo and travel restrictions to Cuba.  This is a complete turnaround from his treasonous acts he committed in the 90's when he violated the embargo as a citizen and did business in Cuba.  He should be in jail. Again, you are lying, and misstating the facts. An independent consulting firm did business with Cuba.  Trumps organization later reimbursed the consulting firm.  Nothing illegal about that.

@aadam101: It's true what they say.  Conservatism is a mental disorder.  Once again it is proven what a bunch of perverts Republicans are.  In the 90's these people were obsessed with who Bill Clinton was canoodling in the Oval Office but they are perfectly willing to look the other way when it comes to Russian collusion. "Technically, the president of the United States cannot obstruct justice,'" he said, adding, "If he wants to fire the FBI director, all he has to do is fire him." But as House speaker in 1998, Gingrich argued the opposite point. As reported by the The Times and other news outlets at the time, when referring to the investigation into President Clinton after his repeated denials of having an affair with Monica Lewinsky, Gingrich described Clinton's actions as "obstruction of justice." "What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice cover-up and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," he said. Video of that statement was resurfaced in a 2011 CNN profile on him after he announced the launch of his presidential exploratory committee. http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-newt-gingrich-says-president-cannot-1497636327-htmlstory.html It's cute that you chopped off the last paragraph of that article - which turns your comment around: Ultimately, Gingrich's House charged Clinton with obstruction of justice, as stated in Article III of the House Judiciary Committee's report that urged his impeachment: "Although, the actions of President Clinton do not have to rise to the level of violating the the federal statute regarding obstruction of justice in order to justify impeachment, some if not all of his actions clearly do."

@sutieday: @mhorndisk: Dude. Those disclosures don't SAY anything! Why are you acting like they are relevant? Why can't you look into Anderson Cooper's family? Why can't you look into the Hillary dealings with Russia? Because you just don't want to hear it. It's fine. It's why Trump won. Because you guys can't handle the Truth. Why do you hate facts, science, and logic? LOL, coming from a guy on the side of "unlimited genders" and setting fire to a building to prevent free speech.

So you are saying that you are tripping on mushrooms?  Now it all makes sense…..

@aadam101: @mhorndisk: Quit acting like this is Disney and Aladdin!!! It's not! They want to murder us! They hate homosexuals as much as the Westboro Baptist Church! Or Republicans…... Or liberals, as long as the fags are white.  Liberals hate them some cracker fags.

Not completely true. While they can have a new trial, it doesn't mean they will.  It's up to the DA.

@aadam101: We want to kill them too.  We do it all the time. It turns my stomach how you are comparing apples with oranges.  There is no comparison between their actions and ours. Oh.. with one exeception.. when Obama was using drones to attack wedding parties to incite retaliation from the muslims.

@Frederick: The left NEVER take responsibility for anything.  At least when ISIS commits an act of terror.. they have the balls to own up to it! The left just blames that bad bad gun for leaping into the hand of that moonbat and forcing him to shoot those people with those evil bullets that jumped into the gun all by themselves.  Bad gun.. bad bullets! http://www.tmz.com/2017/06/14/congress-baseball-shooter-trump-hater/ Hey Frederick To answer your question "Where's all the denouncing of this Trump hater?" It's right there in the article you linked. Sanders just released a statement on Hodgkinson, saying, "I have just been informed that the alleged shooter at the Republican baseball practice is someone who apparently volunteered on my presidential campaign. I am sickened by this despicable act. Let me be as clear as I can be. Violence of any kind is unacceptable in our society and I condemn this action in the strongest possible terms." Does turning a blind eye work when neither are functioning?

@Frederick: Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay.   So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision?  OF COURSE NOT!  They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-will-allow-%E2%80%98dreamers%E2%80%99-to-stay-in-us-reversing-campaign-promise/ar-BBCLECc?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp You're totally right. So you can participate in this asinine partisan hypocrisy or rise above. Call out everyone, including your own party, for behaving exactly the same way. Encourage them to name good things Obama has done.

@pppucci: @Frederick: Seems that Comey stole a lot of top secret / classified / confidential documents that are the property of the United States after he was fired.  That's a massive no-no.  Bad boy, bad boy.. what's he gonna do?  What's he gonna do when they comey for him?   :police: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/judicial-watch-seeking-documents-unlawfully-removed-by-comey.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=add7w5FI6P0 The article refers to the unclassified memos that Comey wrote himself about his conversations with the President.  No matter what you believe about the deliberate release of these to the public,  don't imply it is more than it is. Don't know the specifics.. however, Comey had no business removing anything.  Even his own memos are the property of the United States.  There is more to this.  After being fired, Comey handed over a big fat package of documents related to Trump to Herr Mueller.  It was illegal for him to do that.  Those were not his documents to give.. he stole them. I actually find this witch hunt amusing.  A witch hunt that goes nowhere winds up making fools of those perpetrating it.

@pppucci: @Frederick: @pppucci: I saw a thread in another forum about duplicate accounts, so I re-read the general site rules.  I know that the interpretation of rules can be subjective, but banned content anywhere on the site includes, and  I quote: **_Inappropriate communications that are perceived as inflammatory, hateful, harassing and/or threatening Inflammatory comments or disruptive behavior anywhere on this site will result in a System Warning  that temporarily prevents downloading for a specified period of time. Repeat infringers will be banned. The posting of expletives anywhere is prohibited._** Let's all try to follow these rules. I see you picked a few rules from the GENERAL SITE section that you like.  Obviously those are GENERAL guidelines, that have common sense applications.. which is why there are moderators.. to moderate.  There are rules specific to the FORUMS, and even other rules for the POLITICS and DEBATE section. Obviously one of the most prominent expletives "FUCK" is used extensively on this site.  However, in the future I will replace "FUCK" with "PITCHING WOO", "A bit of the old in-out, in-out", "chopping celery", "Bam-bam in the ham", "Shaboinking", "Bonking", "Driving Miss Daisy", "Making Whoopee", "Planting the Parsnip", or "Heaving Hillary". It's painfully obvious that the libt**** in this forum and in life demand the freedom to say and do whatever THEY like, but are also the first to complain about anybody they oppose saying anything at all.   I have zero tolerance for people that take facts and twist them into lies. So, in the future.. if someone really ticks me off.. rather than say "FUCK YOU!"   I will say "Why don't you go plant your parsnip in a mine field?"  or "Go have a 4 way with Hillary, Huma, and Weiner". Site rules do not trump (pun intended) forum rules. As far as this site goes, FUCK is not only an expletive and is most often used to describe a sexual act, like Jack fucks John,  But if you say, "FUCK OFF Drwas!" then that clearly is an expletive. If you search for that word in the forums, you will see the difference in use between this forum and all the others. In terms of twisting facts into lies–-people in glass houses.... And now, I am off to plant my parsnip in a mine field and then off to the four-way.  :crazy2: :cheers: This is for the moonbats - a muslim explains the proper usage of the word "FUCK" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nToTEAbGt_o

@Frederick: You say I am wrong.. at the same time you just confirmed that what I said was RIGHT! No I did not; what you said was this: @Frederick: The most incredible thing about that vote is that 47 (I guarantee all Democraps) voted to block it. You claimed that all 47 who blocked were democrats, which was false. Rand Paul, Lee, and Heller and, all republicans, voted to block, along with independents King and Sanders. Only 42 democrats voted to block, not 47. @Frederick: I said that I guarantee that all the democrats voted against it.  I have also mentioned that the democrats all stick together and vote as a block - regardless of their own free will.  Republicans don't stick together and vote like mindless zombies.  There are a few - actually quite a few - that are flakey and don't go along with the rest of the republicans. This is also false; 5 "flakey" (I think you mean flaky) democrats (Nelson, Manchin, McCaskill, Donnelly, Warner) voted not to block. So much for your false implication that all democrats vote regardless of their own will. @Frederick: Regardless, what I said was entirely correct. As I said earlier, no, it wasn't. Feel free to check the senate role call for yourself. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00143#position I'll say it before and I'll say it again; read the story and at least do some research before you put out alternative facts AKA falsehoods.

@sutieday: @mhorndisk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=82&v=a39JswIqrHc Sorry, but your Trump assassination play won't go on ANY longer you SICK fucks. We're about ready to kick your asses even harder than you EVER imagined. Keep it up. Our patience is running very thin. The character wasn't called "Donald Trump" it just looked like him Hooray for free speech! Who are the fascists now? so can we expect more crazy shooters from the left now? great…

@Frederick: @sutieday: @raphjd: @sutieday: Sometimes I wonder whether the alt-right guys really just want to create an all-white ethno-state for themselves. Such a dumb ass statement. No, many on the far-right (alt-right) want to ban immigrants from all countries except Europe, and even then only allow those that are white. Conservative extremists like Ann Counter have suggested this. So to claim that some may have this idea of a whites only ethno-state is not so farfetched. It is farfetched honey.  Also, if you are going to say things like that, you need to provide a link to what you are talking about.  I know you like to make things up yourself, and don't want to be constrained by actual facts. I went ahead and looked up for you.  What Coulter said was there should be a TEMPORARY ban on immigration from ALL countries.   She didn't exclude Europe, and said nothing about white people. Just how long do you think you should be allowed to post blatantly false statements in this forum without being muted?  What's that thing you are always doing to other people?  Oh yeah.. I remember.. Also, the alt-right pro-claims "white genocide" as a reason for banning immigrants. There is no genocide of white people, they just may have smaller families on average as compared to their ethnic counterparts.

@raphjd: Do you honestly think that BLM added black and brown to the flag because of that? No. Just a colorimetric musing. ;D

@Frederick: @pppucci: @Frederick: @Matie: What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time About that channel allegation.. it seems to me that there SHOULD be back channels to communicate with other governments without having the communications made public.  Of course that can sort of be done through ambassadors, but that has big problems too. Here is one example that I can think of at the moment:  In Iran, they have elected leaders.. HOWEVER, the elected leader is actually a puppet.  The non-elected religious leader is the true power, and the elected leader governs with the permission of the religious nut leader.  It's very much like a King who has governors.  The governor is the one operating the government, but must answer to the King.  Likewise, it is virtually impossible to have a rational, meaningful communication with another leader when it is done in public or the leader is not able to speak freely. In the case of Jared Kushner, it was the Russian ambassador who was suggesting a back channel.  Yes, a back channel was discussed, but it wasn't Jared that initiated it. As for leaders initiating sneaky back channel deals with Russia… watch this:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE And don't forget Slippery Hillary's deal with Russia.. which benefit herself.. in which she sold Russian 20% of the USA uranium reserves!  In exchange, the Clinton foundation got $31 million and a pledge for another $100 million!!!    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHiuGbwvDww LOCK HER UP! No one is arguing that back channels are an essential and appropriate part of international diplomacy.  Most even grant that it was appropriate for Jared to lay the groundwork for one with the Russians.  However, considering using Russian facilities to hide the communications from the American national security apparatus borders on treason. The Hilary allegation is old news.  She is not president and her political career is over.  Move on. Hillary is not old news until this nonsense about the 2016 election is put to rest.  It sure isn't put to rest now is it?  Oh wait, I forgot.. according to moonbat rules, the left can attack all they like about anything going back to the "big bang", but nobody else can refer to anything to counter their attacks. Apparently it was the Russian ambassador that came up with the idea for the back channel.. so whatever the plan was.. is not Jared's fault and certainly not Trump's fault.  Also, since this back-channel was never implemented, nor were even any plans made - it is completely baseless and irrelevant.  The world has not yet gotten to the point of prosecuting ideas. Lastly, I fail to see why the act of communicating with another country is treason.  Again.. an examples of treason are Hillary selling Russia 20% of the uranium in the USA to Russia in exchange for $131 million paid to the Clinton Foundation… Or Obama giving hundreds of billion$ to Iran - in exchange for.. well.. we got NOTHING in return for that apparently. First the legitimacy of the 2016 election has been put to rest.  No one has ever suggested that the Russians were able to change vote tallies.  They just tried to screw with us and our thinking. Second, how are you so sure the use of Russian facilities was the ambassador's idea? Jared should have known better. And how are you so sure it was never implemented?  Are you a Russian spy? Third, the Clinton foundation is not the Clinton Personal Wallet.  I admit some family members get salaries and they fly around the world on private jets, but the vast majority of the money goes to pay for HIV drugs for poor children. Fourth, the billions for Iran was always their money, we just released it from sequester.

@brettw97: Our policy on Chechnya makes it a dumpster fire.  When the Sovet Union fell apart, Chechnya fought a war a separatist war to break away from Yeltsin's Russia.  Yeltsin fought to keep Chechnya.  When Putin came to power, the war was raging, and the US forced a settlement down Russia's throat, who was weak at that time, to allow Russia to keep Chechnya in exchange for Muslim autonomy in Chechnya.  Any change on our position in Chechnya permits Putin to reopen that can of worms.   We never should have forced the original Chechnya settlement on Russia. Be careful.  The liberals have made up their own rule that they won't discuss anything from the past on which we now know the facts.  All they want to talk about is speculation, anonymous sources, and current investigations.  Do not antagonize them with facts!  How DARE you disrupt their fantasies!  To redeem yourself, I suggest you purchase a case of Play Doh and a box of coloring books, and donate them to your nearest liberal college.  And do NOT forget to include crayons!  In fact, include EXTRA crayons because they like to chew on them.

@brettw97: Actually, the police did screw up royally here.  Several family members in law enforce.  New SOP for active shooter/mass casualty situations is not to wait and establish perimeter.  Post-Columbine the SOP is to immediately charge in, neutralize the threat, and secure the scene for EMS.  None of that occurred here.  The police held back waited for SWAT, tried to negotiate.  None of this is SOP. May a new virgin twink appear at the foot of your bed every evening! I would add one thing though.. this situation didn't blow up into a mass casualty situation until well AFTER the SWAT team arrived.  Had the cop done his job to begin with, this massacre would have been avoided.  I would also add that not one of the police suffered a significant injury.  103 people injured, 50 of them killed.  I wouldn't be surprised if over 1000 rounds of ammunition were bouncing off the walls in there, and yet not one significant injury to a cop?  I cannot believe that any of the cops put themselves in any great danger.  Should a cop put themselves in danger?  Well.. YES!  That is what they are PAID for.  If my job is to clean a restroom or be a plumber, my job would include dealing with human feces.  If my job is to fight a war, I have to fight that war and not hide in an underground bunker.  Last year, a cop chased a car with young girls in it at very high speeds.  That is mistake #1.  They should have kept their distance and waited for other patrol cars to intercept them.  Instead, they went chasing them like an episode of "The Dukes Of Hazzard" putting pedestrians and other cards at risk.  The 3 girls - perhaps only the one driving was a criminal - wound up driving into a retention pond.  The car started to sink.  20 officers surrounded the retention pond and not one of them went in to attempt any rescue.. not even the cops that were hired as trained divers.  It was night time, and they were afraid their might be snakes in the retention pond.  All 3 girls drowned.  The criminal sheriff defended the cops actions (and got re-elected on Nov 8, 2016).  Being a cop is one of the most difficult jobs there is.. and sadly.. there are very few cops who do their job competently.  If I call a cop.. I expect Joe Friday and Frank Gannon to show up.. not Barney Fife or the cast of Reno 911.