@raphjd: The left;  Obama knew about and allowed Russia to mess with US elections, but so what, let's blame Trump. What could have Obama have done that wouldn't have gotten him slammed by Trump and the right?  Any action he took would have been seen as interference with the election.

@raphjd: "We did everything possible to ensure Hillary would win" - Chris Cuomo on CNN "we sure did, but it wasn't enough apparently" - his female co-host Is this what you are referring to?  a quote from 2014 before Hilary was a candidate? http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/23/donald-trump/donald-trump-fundraising-email-takes-cnn-anchors-c/ If there is another, please provide the link.

@jazuko: Did Warmbier beat someone up and show himself as a violent thug before stealing that flag and then attempting to assault a cop like Michael brown? you guys still acting like the only difference between these two guys and their situations was skin color? ::) They're still acting like this, because SJWs are by far the most racist group of people in American society today – both against white people for being unable to empathize and blacks/minorities for the soft racism of low expectations. This thread being a clear and blatant example of that ugly racism. Disgusting. Warmbier was white, Brown was black. To white people, Otto Warmbier became a symbol of those who suffer under the weight of evil, despotic, dictatorial regimes, as well as an emblem of destroyed innocence that should have never suffered such pain in a situation which was ultimately not his fault. To white people, Michael Brown became a symbol of society out of control, of a parisitic class of criminally-minded individuals with no respect for authority and who deserve all the misery of the world as punishment for situations usually of their own fault. OBVIOUSLY, these are not all the differences as already pointed out multiple times.  Putting effort into making a post with cutesy graphics doesn't change your faulty assumptions.

@mhorndisk: The one problem with your statement is that you insinuate that conservatives are claiming someone's race shouldn't exist. I can't tell you how many recent articles I've read about that kind of speech coming from liberals. Just look for them. "No whites allowed: Blacks-only HS assembly outrages white parents, so how did principal defend it?" http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/03/08/no-whites-allowed-blacks-only-hs-assembly-outrages-white-parents-so-how-did-principal-defend-it-185199 No Whites Allowed: Seattle ‘Yoga Class for People of Color’ Excludes Caucasians https://www.infowars.com/no-whites-allowed-seattle-yoga-class-for-people-of-color-excludes-caucasians/ I could go on but there are literally hundreds of examples of whitey must die, whitey is responsible for everything, whitey is this, whitey is that, we need to eliminate whitey. It just goes on and on and on and on and on. Nothing like that ever comes from conservatives and if you just don't see it or get it, I don't have time to show you what you just don't want to see. It's like trying to tell someone that cigarettes are bad for you. It doesn't matter. What the hell are you talking about? I mentioned "someone" as in someone individually, not a conservative. You do realize my argument could mean ANYONE, right? It could also apply to black people who claim they don't want whites to exist, or Asians who say they don't want anyone other than Asian's to exist. I'm talking about white supremacists like Richard Spencer. I'm talking about black supremacists like Louis Farrakhan. Where did I say conservatives make the argument that a race shouldn't exist? This is why I'm calling for more civility, these wild accusations without proof are getting way out of hand. You completely misconstrued my point and I believe you did it on purpose.

@jazuko: Liberals will call any white person whos proud of their heritage/ lacking white guilt a white supremacist. many things non-white people do that white people will do is considered "supremacist" when white people do it but ok and encouraged if youre not white. ive seen articles telling white gay guys their racist supremacists just for dating other white guys. There are laws which make punishments extremely severe if a crime is designated as a "hate crime".  This often happens when the crime involves the use of racially charged words.  Seems to me that calling someone a "white supremacist" when they are not should be put under the category of a hate crime.  I remember about 5 years ago, someone I was arguing with on the telephone kept calling me a "cracker".  I had NEVER been called that before.  She got angrier by the second because I acted as if I had no idea what "cracker" meant.    "Why are you calling me a cracker?"  "Oh, because I'm white?"  "Well, then you can call me cracker all you like!"

love how these are the same type of women calling men fragile

@aadam101: @jojojojo3: @aadam101: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/domestic-terrorism-white-supremacists-islamist-extremists_us_594c46e4e4b0da2c731a84df "When it comes to domestic terrorism in America, the numbers don’t lie: Far-right extremists are behind far more plots and attacks than Islamist extremists. There were almost twice as many terrorist incidents by right-wing extremists as by Islamist extremists in the U.S. from 2008 to 2016, according to a new report from The Nation Institute’s Investigative Fund and The Center for Investigative Reporting’s Reveal." I've been saying it for months.  The GOP is a terrorist group hell-bent on destroying America.  Their healthcare bill will kill far more Americans than some little group like ISIS. that's a lie. and you know it. hell they even lied about the numbers of the Pulse shooting but hey go a head be a ******* ****** i can't stop you. meanwhile the rest of us that have sex with men aren't going to use hey X is bad but Y is SOOO much worse as a way to downplay Terrorism. You stand up to the nasty religious right with all their words and pearl clutching,  you brave trooper. :police:  We'll have none of that please. :police: Yikes….another angry white guy I guess..... "everyone i disagree with is white!" ::)

Well, you are correct to a degree, however, it temporarily reversed the decision by the lower courts and showed that their rulings didn't hold water. If there were any actual merit to their lower rulings, it wouldn't have been a question. The fact that it's being temporarily and partially over ruled is a big win because not even one of the SCOTUS has agreed that it's as cut and dry as the liberals have tried to make it out to be. It certainly isn't unconstitutional, because if it were, it would be pretty clear, as the Constitution is clear.

@sutieday: Conservatives/Alt-right love to lower the reputation of their opponents, especially on this board. So says the person that made it his mission to down vote everything his enemies said, no matter what it was.

As I have pointed out before, county data is irrelevant.  Trump's electoral vote win was effected by slim margins in several swing states, which granted was a difficult task and not to be diminished, but to maintain he had an overwhelming mandate just simply is not true.

I'm surprised she got fired. With the exception of the University of Chicago,  western colleges/universities love minority faculty who openly and blatantly hate white people.  The next best is self loathing cuck white faculty who blindly support white hatred. This is another example of black privilege, because white can't do this.

@pppucci: As for the high per capita cost of healthcare in the US versus other countries, realize the others have various forms of "socialized medicine,"and care is rationed. Care is rationed in the US too.

@raphjd: @pppucci: Congratulations!  Trump is on his way to establishing anarchy so he can impose a dictatorship.  He did not expose the game, he just played it better than anyone else.  Now only his rules matter and we all will get played. Were you that guy that said the same crap about Obama or was that a different clown? Not me.

@jazuko: i dont like him but that seems like a weak thing to go for considering how flaming some gays are I'm waiting for the first presidential debate in which one candidate says "WhatEVERRRRRRRRR!"

The claim that right wingers are responsible for terrorism is nuts. It's you looney left-tards that are clearly responsible. Quit murdering people and blaming it on us. This is WHY you keep losing elections and you are only committing suicide. Your days are over, your time is numbered, the number is up. You are finished. "A new report by Europol has revealed that leftists carried out 27 times more terror attacks than right-wingers in 2016, once again debunking claims that the right represents a bigger extremist threat. 142 failed, foiled and completed terrorist attacks occurred in Europe throughout last year, with 27 being blamed on left-wingers. Just one right-wing terror attack was recorded for the entire year. 13 attacks were blamed on Islamic jihadists, while the majority of attacks (99) were labeled “separatist” attacks. Attacks which led to deaths of victims are almost exclusively Islamic, with 135 of the 142 deaths and 374 of the 379 injured due to jihadist terror. The statistics once again debunk the notion, which has received traction yet again after this week’s attack on Muslim worshippers near a mosque in London, that right-wing terror represents a major threat." Wow.

Corporate welfare will always be there too.  I'm sure the Carrier CEO is laughing all the way to the bank.  He played Pence like a chump.