@Frederick: @mhorndisk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBdqxMUQByU Laughing is a "hail Mary" attempt by sleaze such as Hillary to derail a line of questioning when they are backed up against a wall with no place to go. Also, if you look at the posts of the most notorious long red liners.. they often end their sentences with an LOL.   They have nothing to offer but ridicule. Hilary used to rule but not anymore..

@Frederick: @mhorndisk: I said there is always a diplomatic solution. Going to war is what the globalists want. Hell no. War costs lives. I would go for assassination before I would go to all out war. I'm not an expert on what's going on, but if war happens, it is what it is. If they attack us, then yes, but there is always a path to peace that doesn't include war. The problem with polls is that they often don't give the right options. Assassination of that crazy Kim Jung Poon would probably be the best solution, BUT.. other than LBJ, taking out a leader from within has rarely happened.  Kimmy has wiped out his opposition already.  Something must be done, Kim has to go.  There is no diplomatic solution with a living Kim.

@raphjd: @Frederick: @royalcrown89: Our absence is directly tied to your toxicity. Have fun in your echo chamber.  :cheers: I forgot to welcome you back to the forum.   When did they let you out? He was only muted for a short time.   He  could have posted ages ago. …if he had access to a computer, he could have posted ages ago...

@mhorndisk: Iran got billions of dollars… what did we get? Nothing! That's not a deal at all, it's a payment. Why would you just give someone money for nothing unless it's a dollar to a homeless person...? Money for nothing..  but no twinks for free!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GObKpWdwJA4&t=8s

@mhorndisk: You didn't hear about Tesla in school, yet he gave us the internet, and hundreds of other things. That's because he was a genius. They don't want you to know about those guys. They want you to believe in fake crap. There is a lot of truth in that.  Edison is given credit for inventing quite a few things, when in fact, he was merely the boss of a large team of inventors including Tesla.  What happened is that when electricity became available, there was a massive door opened to new devices. As for Einstein, pretty much everything he is known for is a result of what he did when he was 28 years old.

Honestly at this point I think most gay people are either just fucking stupid or enemies because they have an apathetic approach to all life. Not all of t hem. But you guys are just fucking dumb. I can't believe you'd stand for this after everything we've been through. I'm ashamed of pretty much 90% of you.

LOL that's great!

@royalcrown89: Starting 2 expensive wars while cutting taxes on the super rich was one of the dumbest things George W. Bush did as president. Well, that and not responding effectively to over 1,000 people dying in Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina. President Obama added to the debt because he had to get our country out of the worst recession since the Great Depression. Overlooking that fact would be highly ignorant of recent history. You call doubling the debt to $20 Trillion merely 'adding to the debt"?  Wheeeee!

Crack. Not even once.

I've heard. I couldn't live in the US if I wanted to. The US is one big trigger for me: I have a short fuse for idiocy. On the plus side, watching Japanese news anchors have to explain why American suddenly started wearing vagina pink hats on their heads was priceless. Watching America unravel while I've been over here broke my heart. I could rant at length but I have a hunch you'd already know my gripes.

Have you ever been here?  Anywhere? I was serious before. I will pay your airfare to come and swim in the nuclear fuel pool.

@cteavin: @Frederick: @cteavin: I guess Kim Jung Un vowing to sink Japan into the ocean means nothing.. Rocketman recently launched 2 ICBM's right over Japan, causing Japan to warn their citizens to seek shelter. KJU has been consistently setting off more ICBM tests and more nuclear explostions.. and now says he is considering detonating a nuke over the Pacific Ocean. What does NK have to do before people consider him to be a real threat?   Nuke NYC?   He's already got the missiles that can reach NYC in 40 mins. Yes and no. Do you speak another language? In translating between A and B a lot is lost. Translating to any Latin or Germanic language from any of the Asian languages makes those translations 1000 times more difficult because there are subtleties built into each language.      In Japanese they have keigo, honorifics based on age and social position. Translations often make Japanese sound more polite and distant than it actually is and makes for terrible translations when taken literally. The same is true for Korea. How, exactly, do you sink an island? Kim's words are bluster and people here understand that.    As for seeking shelter, be aware of the bias in the news you watch. There's a need to cast the tiny little-impoverished country of North Korea as a supervillain capable of destroying the US. That way of thinking about individuals terrorists gave us The Patriot Act. Those misdirections in the news made it okay to bomb Iraq and Afghanistan.      No one went looking for shelter when NK sent rockets over Japan. Not even close. They did broadcast it on the news and that's all they talked about for the hour or so it happened. What's odd to me is that NK has launched missiles over Japan before with much less fuss. What's different? PM Abe wants to pass his amendments changing the constitution. Nothing says we need an army like a country flying missiles over your northernmost, least densely populated region. In regards to translation, I'm glad you mentioned that.  Specifically,  translating between Chinese and English is damned near impossible.

The only way I'll be ok with it is if I can have an exemption for starting an HSA, which Trump campaigned heavily on.

@Bluesurfer: @Frederick: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/18/clinton-considers-contesting-election-results.html Not sure if you read the article or not but this was her response on the issue of contesting the election and I quote ''Clinton later said there have been “scholars” and “academics” who argue challenging the results would be possible - but Clinton herself dismissed the idea." Hopefully this will clear up your confusion! I don't doubt you, however, that is how Hillary says things without being held accountable for them.  For instance.. she often starts and interview or speech by spending 10 seconds saying how she takes responsibility for her loss…  then spends the next hour blaming everybody else for her loss. I bet she didn't name those "scholars" and "academics" who argue she could challenge the results.  They don't exist.  It's her idea, nobody else has mentioned that.  She is like a child saying "Well I COULD have done this, but I'm not because I'm a good little bitch".  She's a bad bitch, and should have just kept her mouth shut instead of restating what "someone else" might have said.