@lawyer72us No They have their site www.naturalbornbreeders.com

@roadhog2001-0 I am not aware of any underage people in porn of the 60's and 70's from studio porn. I have never sought out underage porn mainly because I don't find them attractive. The only underage stuff I have seen is from Brent Corrigan of Cobra, Oliver Krist of Bel Ami and a webcam performer named Dillon. They lied and said they were 18 when they were actually 16 and 17. They got away with it because they looked 18+ I was never a fan of Colt movies, but as I recall, their performers are in their 30s. There were some b/w movies made by some famous guy who I can't recall his name. There is a documentary about him. His movies were not explicit and pretty much r-rated. Due to the expense of filming and other factors I don't think there is any explicit gay porn before about 1984. Even the first gay porn I saw - Cousins - is not that explicit. I don't think there is any video of an asshole in that movie. i think the reason the old stuff has been purged from libraries is because it is so low quality and degraded. 8mm looks like crap, and anything recorded on VHS fades / degrades after a few years. Even CDs and DVDs degrade after a couple of years. The only way to store data without loss of quality is digitally. Any physical media is going to degrade. If you are talking about the legality.. technically, porn of any kind is illegal in most places in the USA, but rarely enforced. There was a famous case in the past couple of years in which a male and female actor were filmed in the nude in a movie they made several decades ago, and now those 2 actors are trying and failing to sue the director for filming them nude when they were underage. it was not a porn movie, but they were nude.

@ianfontinell-0 a couple of years ago, I saw a Russian performer who was using a Lush.. and BEGGING people to STOP tipping him - which led to them tipping the maximum amount to "rape" his ass... and he was literally bouncing off the walls begging them to stop. But to be fair to the boys.. this is what females do almost ALL the time. I forget the percentages.. but virtually all female orgasms are fake. Especially for anal, because females do not have a prostate gland which is what makes anal sex pleasurable for men. To make up for the fact that they are not sexually interesting, females have to do things like moan a lot, and eat cum like it is candy.

@stevestraugh Not a reader of these, but it looks like he has a tumblr and you might be able to find stuff there? https://www.tumbex.com/macstevens.tumblr/post/107505640987

@desmondd Hmm, I think I was a torrent for authentic footballers last week, but it suddenly seems to have disappeared. Anyone know what happened?

@DreamDick recently the only studios i have been checking are Treasure Island, Eric Videos and RFC, but I also enjoy Maverick Men, HYB and Citebeur. Some names that I don't go for anymore, but still enjoy their older stuff are Corbin Fisher, Disruptive, Ment at Play and Lucas Entertainment.

@DreamDick said in Malik Delgaty First Time?: who is he sucking? Filou Fitt aka Philippe Soulier

amature content is always good from JFF / OF / RFC Raging stallion/Falcon/NS is probably the only studio close to the old style with big productions etc.- even if its simplified alot from the early days - and usually they get straight into the action titan men is surely missed these days.

agreed, this fetish ensemble is not very doable because it requires everything to be properly labelled, and GT isn't designed around that. We only have a very limited set of categories. Without labels we have to rely exclusively in the title/description and we know people will put whatever they want in there. Titles and descriptions, most of the time, don't really describe what is actually happening in the videos, but rather they are "interpretations" of how the person who uploaded it wanted to see it. This makes search itself a pain in the butt for regular purposes, let alone what you are suggesting, which is even more granular and complex. This site is very old and despite the staff being super nice and doing the best they can, the site itself has frozen in time.

@odas523-0 It has 4 seeders.

@raphjd Shows you how often I request things. Last time I started using this forum most have been over 3 years ago then, cuz there were a ton of requests. Thanks for the update. Makes sense, I understand why.

@roadhog2001-0 you are disregarding the previous statement, which is the only statement that matters. Any person that appear in any depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct were over the age of 18 at the time of production, and all records are kept, as required by law. The subsequent statement indicates that the website might contain media that is exempt from this specific law (record keeping) because it doesn't contain sexually explicit conduct, or because they were produced prior to the existence of the law, when record keeping was not required. To put it shortly, they are not required to keep age records for content that is not actual sexually explicit conduct, like nudity or simulated sex, and lastly, content that were filmed prior to the law. The reason for this disclaimer is, one might request age records for a specific production, and they don't have it, not because it is illegal, but because said production is exempt from record keeping for one or another reason.

@ClwnMan76 The guys I used to sub to are no longer on the site or they have reduced the amount they do. Sadly, most stuff on OF is less than a minute of fluff.