"Pseudo factual depiction"  translates to "fantasy".    No one is actually raped, molested in their sleep, etc, etc.      There is a huge difference between "pseudo factual depiction" and  real factual depictions.    "Pseudo factual depictions" are video where the massive screaming queen pretends to be straight and has never messed around with another guy, but has no problem taking a massive cock up his ass. TRUE, pedophilia (sexual feelings toward children), in and of itself, is not illegal.  It's acting upon it that is illegal.  That being said, I'm sure you understood the context it was used in, but decided to play a word game. I can't think of any laws that don't have moral reasons behind them.  This does not invalidate them, as suggested. The slippery slope argument is a valid argument here.  If we give on 1 thing, then people demand 30 more things, rinse and repeat…..............  It's something the staff, especially the senior staff have to deal with every day. Unless you can show otherwise, say by a statement from the various websites that produce these videos, we will have to assume that anyone shooting up IV drugs is a drug addict.    In Pennsylvania, for example, it's considered rape if you exploit a person's condition (ie drug addiction) to get sex.  As with alcohol, sex while on drugs can be deemed as rape, because the person can't give informed consent.  The UK and Australia have similar laws.  That's with me only doing a quick google check. JUST SO EVERYONE KNOWS, THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE AND FINALIZED.    ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION IS POINTLESS.