@lololulu19 You have previously made clear your opposition to "being lumped in" with "T" most recently spouting your distaste specifically for transvestites in this thread. where you said:
What I resent is having transvestites lumped in with homosexuals. That is insulting. What's next? lumping pedophiles, necrophiliacs, and people who practice bestiality in with homosexuals?
I gave you my thoughts on your opinions there and you never bothered to come back with a counter-response, so I'm not going to waste time repeating what I said there. I do have a question though. The tone of your previous posts on related matters suggests to me that you are usually referring to males transitioning to female. Do you have the same distaste for women who transition the other way?
Your posts have always given the impression that you believe men should be men, and all men should be having sex with men regardless of their sexuality. I don't know you so don't take what I'm about to say as a personal attack, and I could be way off the mark, but the overall trend I'm seeing appears to parallel some aspects of incel thought processes. What I'm seeing is a distaste for women, at least as far their physical form or appearance is concerned, borne out by arguments you've previously made for not allowing straight porn on the site despite there being an obvious "straight guys for gay eyes" argument to the contrary. Though I can't remember if you've ever said as much, I do wonder if your objections to males presenting as females is in some way connected to that idea. Similarly, the overall trend across your posts appears to indicate a desire to vastly increase the number of men who have sex with other men, such as in this post where you suggest that guys should either do 4 years of military service or 4 years of gay porn to pay off their college loans. Note that you specifically say "gay porn" as opposed to just porn.
In another post you say that all guys should be taught about gay sex and give prostate massagers to save the planet from overpopulation.
As I've said before, many of your posts come across in such a way back up the lunatic conspiracy theories held by some people about there being a "Gay Agenda," that we all just want to turn the whole world gay so there are more guys to have sex with.
Coming back to another aspect of your post, I think most people would regard each of the letters of LGBTQIA+ as being mutually exclusive. I confess that I have never knowingly met a gay lesbian or an asexual bisexual, but perhaps one day I might. The same can also be said for S, straight. The other groups such as paedophiles, masochists, child molesters (bit redundant if paedophiles is already in the list,) wife-beaters and necrophilies are not mutually exclusive, either with each other or any of the LGBTQIA+ and S categories. They can be found in any of them, so I think it is unbelievably childish and offensive to try and suggest that they be "lumped in" with straight people as a group. Bigots have tried to make the same connections to our community, and firing back the same unreasoned arguments does little to help anyone.
Finally, and on a different subject, why did you think this post was Gay News? I know it's been moved to Chit Chat now, but seriously?
