@blablarg18 "race neutral" if you fail to see that most immigrants aren't white. Where's the uproar over German immigrants bringing in actual nazis or the Italians bringing in fascism? Equally as dangerous as labeling anyone from outside your country as "child & drug traffickers". It's just stupid rhetoric that actually makes zero sense.

It boggles my mind how someone can be a minority and not understand how other minorities are impacted by the same kind of negative stereotyping you're trying to force onto them. LGBT+ people should be the first ones to extend a hand at others who are born different, and yet... Here I sit, having read the dumbest of arguments about how anti-migration is "colorblind".

Some people were just dropped on their head as a baby, ig.

@blablarg18 Bro there are more parties and directions than left or right. Libertarians, Christian Democrats, Nationalists, Greens... None of these map cleanly onto left/right. Reading a history book might help you figure that one out, but I think you get the point.

@blablarg18 Cool origin story, but your entire spectrum is just "who kills Christians" with extra steps. That's a persecution complex with a bibliography, not political theory.

The French Revolution origin is real. The part you left out is that which side of the room you sat on was about economics and power, not religion. The aristocrats and other nobles who aligned with the king would be on the right, and everyone else would sit on the left. You took a historical footnote and retrofitted your whole worldview onto it.

Bolsheviks and Khmer Rouge were brutal to clergy, sure. But 'some regimes killed priests' doesn't make that the defining axis of all politics. Liberation theology and Christian socialism exist, which is apparently news to you.

On Nazis being far left: they dissolved socialist parties day one, threw Marxists and union organizers in camps. If that's far left, they were really committed to the bit of murdering every other far leftist first, without fail. Historians who actually study fascism (from all sides of the political spectrum) classify it separately precisely because of what fascists DID, not what they called themselves.

The Soros "connected Jews vs working class Jews" bit is where you stopped doing history entirely, by the way. This is supposed to be about politics and history, not a conclusion you built first and reverse-engineered a map to get to.

To clarify, I'm looking for group sex scenes where there are more bottoms than tops, preferably with just one top. We don't have a name/category for that kinda porn, which makes finding it harder than it needs to be...

RFC has a lot of them, I believe, but trying to see which group scenes have what I describe is extremely time-consuming. Do you guys have any recommendations? Any studio is fine, but if you know RFC scenes that fit that description, let me know!

@blablarg18 Cool origin story, but your entire spectrum is just "who kills Christians" with extra steps. That's a persecution complex with a bibliography, not political theory.

The French Revolution origin is real. The part you left out is that which side of the room you sat on was about economics and power, not religion. The aristocrats and other nobles who aligned with the king would be on the right, and everyone else would sit on the left. You took a historical footnote and retrofitted your whole worldview onto it.

Bolsheviks and Khmer Rouge were brutal to clergy, sure. But 'some regimes killed priests' doesn't make that the defining axis of all politics. Liberation theology and Christian socialism exist, which is apparently news to you.

On Nazis being far left: they dissolved socialist parties day one, threw Marxists and union organizers in camps. If that's far left, they were really committed to the bit of murdering every other far leftist first, without fail. Historians who actually study fascism (from all sides of the political spectrum) classify it separately precisely because of what fascists DID, not what they called themselves.

The Soros "connected Jews vs working class Jews" bit is where you stopped doing history entirely, by the way. This is supposed to be about politics and history, not a conclusion you built first and reverse-engineered a map to get to.

@raphjd The gender argument literally adds nothing to the discussion, so... Yeah. Good luck with that one. Your way of viewing politics is extremely narrow-minded. Moving on...

@raphjd Bro, I legitimately don't know what you're talking about. I don't live in the US anymore, so I don't know what this toddler thing is about. You're making a lot of assumptions lol

I could look it up, but I don't think this particular incident has much to do with the main thing we're discussing: this thread being racist and migration. I'm not gonna get into whatever the incident with the toddler and the border patrol was, because it doesn't disprove anything that I said so far. Proving it to be true or not does nothing for the discussion at hand.

@raphjd Bro, it says it right there "AT BEST you're a biggot". Do you know what that means? It means I'm implying more than one possibility. You could be a racist, a bigot or whatever. This really is not the gotcha you think it is lmao

Not only that, but racism is A FORM of bigotry by definition, look:

"Racism is a form of bigotry. A bigot is someone who holds strong prejudices against particular groups, and since racists specifically harbor beliefs about racial superiority and inferiority, they fall under the broader category of bigotry."

Bigotry is any kind of intolerance: from sexism to homophobia. Just the fact that you don't know what the word means is... Aggravating. If this is your definition of not being part of a hivemind, I really would have to ask you if you're okay. You really don't seem to be quite outside this "hivemind" as you might think.

@ianfontinell Will do... Thanks for that, bro!

@ianfontinell That's him! Tyty! Do you know if he does oral-only?

He's so handsome...! Sucks a cock pretty well too, by the looks of it. If you know who this is, please lmk! Thanks in advance!

@blablarg18 Bro there are more parties and directions than left or right. Libertarians, Christian Democrats, Nationalists, Greens... None of these map cleanly onto left/right. Reading a history book might help you figure that one out, but I think you get the point.

@blablarg18 "Voting" for what? To decide if people have the right to make an honest living if they go through the relevant procedures to migrate?

That's like if the whole kitchen had to decide if they would serve a customer on McDonald's before serving them... It's just wasted time. Villages are often the target for migration, because the cost of living is usually lower than a big city's. It's just common sense. Most people are going into a country because they can't live well in theirs, more often than not.

Making the average person vote is not only slow and resource-draining, but also the purpose of the screening IS filtering people to allocate them somewhere they would be a better fit if necessary in the first place. That's the whole point of procedure and the documentation they ask of you. The whole procedure was made so that you WOULDN'T have to vote. That's why it's standardized. No one voted on tax rates, foreign aid, or trade deals either. That's what electing representatives is for.

It's for that reason that that I really do believe it's a race thing. You guys don't know anything about immigration and are just parroting what you see online, without actually thinking about what you're saying, or at least bothering to investigate things further.

And again, you guys brought race and descent into this in the first place. If it was so color-blind as you claim, the title of the thread wouldn't be literally "Ukraine to replace itself with Africans, Latin druggies, Asians". Nor would you guys be defending yourself every post with a variant of "I'm not racist, I swear", or using terms like "you and your ilk".

You just like generalizing people, using migration (a topic that you're clearly not familiar with) and "democracy" as an excuse, without actually wanting to engage in meaningful conversation.

You just want to really say "I am uncomfortable with any kind Mexican or black people around me", but that doesn't fly with most, so you're clinging onto this "it's definitely not a race thing guys!! [skull emoji] [facepalm emoji] Wow, libtards, amirite?" It's that kind of stance that I cannot tolerate, regardless of if the person disagrees with me or not. If you don't want immigrants, at least be honest about why that is, and stop turning the word "democracy" into another buzzword.