Why I do not trust the police - just 1 example
-
UK cops tried to interfere in the murder trial, as well as wanting to paint the murder victim, Henry Nowak, as the racist aggressor.
The murderer was well known in the area, including to the police, as a violent weapons-obsessed thug.
Think about it, the police wanted to vilify the white victim, while downplaying the violent nature of the murderer, because of identity politics, and to lessen their anti-white role in the murder. If the police had dealt with the killer in the number of incidents before the murder, the killer wouldn't be walking the streets to murder Henry.
-
As a person from Eastern Europe I always thought that this whole political correctness in the Western countries is a part of the hypocrisies in their societies and they are well aware of the real nature of the migrants and all of the third world invaders. Turns out I was wrong. Now whites in countries like the UK, France and Belgium have lost it. They will have to either migrate or be physically or genetically digested by the newcommers.
-
@raphjd There's no question, UK police have gone way way off rails.
Every day arresting people for their free speech........ ......while letting poor Henry Nowak bleed out and telling him, No mate you weren't stabbed.
Murder is objectively worse than racism.
Even if Henry had said anything racist - & there's no evidence he did - murder would still be vastly worse. Vikrum Digwa would still deserve a death penalty - for killing so casually, plus lying to cover it up.
& it's police who were racist. (antiwhite) These police should be spat on.
-
One big reason why I do not trust them is that back in 2010, I was wrongfully accused of a crime I did NOT commit. Despite the only "evidence" being nothing more than a verbal allegation, this did NOT stop the police from arresting me anyway, and proceeding to make things as difficult as they possibly could for me, despite the lack of any physical evidence, as well as the fact that when it got taken to court, both "witnesses" (and I use the term loosely) got busted for perjury in the process, one of which flat out admitted to it.
It got much worse though... For several years after it all went down, I got harassed by the police endlessly, despite the fact that I kept everything I did 100% above board, and still had done nothing wrong. After this experience, I lost absolutely all faith in police services, especially when during their investigation, they did come across a fair bit of evidence that at the very least strongly suggested that I did NOT do what I was accused of, however they completely ignored any such evidence, and it never got submitted to the courts, as any evidence that at the very least suggested I didn't do what I was accused of didn't fit the narrative they wanted to push.
It's sad when police services operate in a manner where it's not about finding the facts or finding the truth, but rather, is all about making their case, regardless of whether or not their case holds any factual merit.
-
I have a lot of reasons for why I hate cops, but the 2-teir policing and the anti-white policies are running rampant in the UK.
-
@raphjd Yes... We have a similar problem here in Canada. There seems to be an emerging pattern where if you're white, your name, picture, and all your personal details get broadcast to the masses, and the courts will throw the book at you, deny your bail, and make things difficult, however if you're not white (dare I say "brown people"), not only do you not only get out on bail real quick, but you're also only given a slap on the wrist, and the sentencing is extremely light. Also, if you're not white, your name, picture, or any details are not generally made public.
It gets worse though. In many cases, if you're an immigrant, you get cut a lot of slack, and judges will even go so far as to give you but a mere slap on the wrist, stating that they do not want to sentence you harshly (even if you're a repeat violent offender) because "we don't want to get immigration involved".
For example, an Indian man came to Canada illegally in the first place, obtained a commercial driver's license they were not entitled to receive using fabricated documents, and found himself in a position where despite having had plenty of warning that he needed to stop, he failed to do so when he was supposed to, killing 16 innocent people in the process, and injuring several more. He was charged with 16 counts of 2nd degree murder, among a few other charges. Not only was this man granted bail right away, but the courts were extremely light on him, giving him only a probation order and a fine, and have even gone to great lengths to block any attempt at getting a deportation order, citing "compassion" reasons and that the courts needed to show mercy, despite the large public outcry asking why he's entitled to compassion and mercy, but the families of the 16 people he killed did not. For the record, the sentence he was given was only what the crown attorney prosecuting the case asked for.
By comparison, the woman who started the largest protest in Canadian history in protest of government tyranny over COVID (who happened to be white for the record), got charged with mischief literally for protesting the government, despite having a charter right to do so. The crown attorney who was prosecuting the case actually tried to get a 16 year sentence and a whole bunch of other restrictions. She had all of her assets frozen by the government, and prosecutors tried to make an example out of her. Thankfully for her (and for the charter rights for the rest of us), the judge actually had a brain in his head and ruled that handing down such a harsh sentence would set a dangerous precedent for our charter rights, and open the door for far more nefarious things, so he limited her jail time to time served, a probation order, and community service. It should also be noted that she was denied bail for allegedly posing a threat to public safety.
Thankfully for everyone involved, our former prime minister invoking the Emergencies Act to give himself dictator like powers to shut down the protest, freeze the assets of anyone involved with the protest, and even seizing things like crowd funding campaigns has since been rigorously challenged, being taken all the way to the supreme court, where it got ruled that the measures that Trudeau took were deemed unconstitutional, and that he did not meet the threshold required for doing so. So now, there's a huge public backlash, and many other court cases going on to this day to try to hold him (among a few other people) responsible for what has now been deemed to be an illegal overreach.
This stark contrast not only illustrates exactly what I mean about "brown privilege" as a lot of people have started calling it, but also sends a clear message that in the eyes of the prosecutors, criticizing the government is a more serious offense than 16 counts of 2nd degree murder.
Sound familiar?
-
12345678
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login