• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    USA "Take It Down Act" signed, points to future controversies

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    2 Posts 2 Posters 5 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      blablarg18
      last edited by blablarg18

      USA has new law that bans nonconsensual sharing of "intimate" images.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/19/take-it-down-act-trump/83731286007/

      Its stated intent or "marketing" is: stop revenge porn, stop lewd deepfakes of people.

      To protect under-18 is obvious YES.

      Problem is, over-18 content we will lose as law gets applied more & more broadly.

      First, what about intimate & non-consensual that is legit newsworthy? Remember SenateTwink?

      https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/63910/exclusive-senate-staffer-caught-filming-gay-sex-tape-in-senate-hearing-room-graphic/

      I doubt he wanted his fuck vids out there, BUT, 1. He's the one who fucked in near-sacred public space as middle finger to his nation, 2. He has since monetized it / gone on OnlyFans. Does his stuff need to come down?

      Or Hunter Biden laptop - his naked pics as he does crack with whores were mostly blurred out - and, blurred out, they were newsworthy. Voters deserved to see what it was about.

      Also does "intimate" extend to images non-sex taken at nude beach? or semi-public, like nude sex-segregated locker? roadside piss?

      If yes, what about speedo or bikini? how intimate is intimate?

      What about self-published images & later, person changes their mind?

      What about porn created & shared consensually, then re-shared in absence of explicit consent? (cough)

      These things are sure to be litigated. & infrastructure created to enforce this law, will (further) enable broad censorship or get mis-used.

      Ordinary satire, for instance, will be taken down because the law has no penalties against frivolous takedown requests & platforms will find it easier to over-comply.

      raphjdR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjdR Offline
        raphjd Forum Administrator @blablarg18
        last edited by

        @blablarg18

        The same thing happened in the UK. It started out fine, then expanded by the courts. The government pulled back some, which helped.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post