https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/19/take-it-down-act-trump/83731286007/

Its stated intent or "marketing" is: stop revenge porn, stop lewd deepfakes of people.

To protect under-18 is obvious YES.

Problem is, over-18 content we will lose as law gets applied more & more broadly.

First, what about intimate & non-consensual that is legit newsworthy? Remember SenateTwink?

https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/63910/exclusive-senate-staffer-caught-filming-gay-sex-tape-in-senate-hearing-room-graphic/

I doubt he wanted his fuck vids out there, BUT, 1. He's the one who fucked in near-sacred public space as middle finger to his nation, 2. He has since monetized it / gone on OnlyFans. Does his stuff need to come down?

Or Hunter Biden laptop - his naked pics as he does crack with whores were mostly blurred out - and, blurred out, they were newsworthy. Voters deserved to see what it was about.

Also does "intimate" extend to images non-sex taken at nude beach? or semi-public, like nude sex-segregated locker? roadside piss?

If yes, what about speedo or bikini? how intimate is intimate?

What about self-published images & later, person changes their mind?

What about porn created & shared consensually, then re-shared in absence of explicit consent? (cough)

These things are sure to be litigated. & infrastructure created to enforce this law, will (further) enable broad censorship or get mis-used.

Ordinary satire, for instance, will be taken down because the law has no penalties against frivolous takedown requests & platforms will find it easier to over-comply.