USSA watch: Biden took foreign bribe, so indict Trump
-
Aaand..on cue, Biden Regime DOJ to indict Trump next week:
Looks like Biden Regime is rushing the indictments, skipping over questions about whether they tampered witness...
...in connection with a senior prosecutor working on the case attempting to influence a key witness by discussing federal judgeship with the lawyer representing the witness...
And Trump in reality had power to declassify the docs & take them with him as Obama, Clinton & all USA Presidents do when leaving.
If Biden a criminal who took foreign bribes, indicting Trump on something - anything - is Regime job #1.
That is how dictatorships - trying to mask as legit lawful democracy - do their work.
-
USA Oversight Committee seen FD-1023 in SCIF. Reports say
-
USA FBI paid informant in Ukraine for years, delivered good stuff
-
around 2015-16, Burisma investigated by Ukraine anti-corruption bureau
-
FBI informant advised Burisma to get a lawyer & defend themselves right
-
instead, per informant, Burisma went to 2 unnamed Bidens, paid each $5 million laundered thru layers totalling $10 million
-
VP Joe Biden then intervened with Ukraine bureau, pressured to kill Burisma investigation & they did
-
violates many USA laws including USA constitution clause against Bribery
-
investigation continues
-
FBI still won't show document outside SCIF despite valid subpoena
PS. Rudy Giuliani confirmed this BUT independently, FBI sources & work 100% separate.
Biden Regime's answer: Indict Trump! Something! Anything! Make shit up! Indict over paperwork questions hitting all USA ex-Presidents! but get Trump somehow!
-
-
Unbelievable: Biden Regime wanted a Trump witness to alter story, pressured HIS LAWYER by dangling lawyer's application for USA federal judge.
-
Rachel Maddow says quiet part out loud: "proscribe" Trump (her term - & awful term of Roman history) as part of "political solution" to Regime cooking up these fake Trump indictments.
Lawrence ODonnell blathers to general effect, Rachel please don't say quiet part so loud.
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1667007756014960641
Fun sideline:
Obama's CIA director (who was never president with declassification authority) stole classified documents and gave them to his mistress in exchange for sex for years
He was allowed to plead to a misdemeanor and got probation
His name is David Petraeus
-
@blablarg18 A grand jury examined the evidence and concluded that there was enough there to indict. End of story.
Didn't you once way something about believing in a nation of laws? Bingo.
-
@blablarg18 At least some of his lawyers are smart
https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-lawyers-trusty-rowley-resign-statement-2023-06-09/
-
-
-
-
-
-
@jaroonn said in USSA watch: Biden took foreign bribe, so indict Trump:
@blablarg18 A grand jury examined the evidence and concluded that there was enough there to indict. End of story.
Didn't you once way something about believing in a nation of laws? Bingo.
Clearly, we have multiple levels of the justice system.
Trump had the power to declassify.
Until 20 Jan 2021, Biden never had the power to declassify documents, but he had a lot of them. He had documents that dated back to his time as a Senator and VP. None of them were secure.
Biden won't get prosecuted because the FBI, DOJ, etc are dirty to the core.
-
@raphjd BIden is being investigated. If he is guilty, then he should be charged. End of story.
"Trump HAD the power to declassify." Yes. He DID. And if you read the charges against him, you will see why this is not a defense in this case. Some of these documents were of a sensitive military nature, and if even he had declassified them (which he admitted on the tapes that he had not), it would be further proof that he is a dangerous idiot he would have been fired as manager of McDonalds. I know the Trumpanzees are pretty much completely blind followers, but this is a new low, even for them.
-
See, you are incapable of keeping to the facts. You NEED to personally attack Trump, as if that somehow proves any point other than you have extreme TDS.
Trump's documents were in a secure area under his house at Mara Lago, under Secret Service protection. He also did whatever he was told to do to make them even more secure.
Until Biden became President, he never, ever had the authority to declassify documents but he had classified documents dating back to when he was a Senator and VP.
Slam fuckin' Dunk right there.
Also, the documents were not secured.
They were in a house that he rented out to his crackhead son, for $50k per month.
Hillary broke federal laws and violated Congressional subpoenas. The FBI and DoJ said she didn't "intend" to break federal laws, so she did nothing wrong. She did intend to violate Congressional subpoenas, but still nothing.
Eric Holder violated Congressional subpoenas. and NOTHING.
The pattern is extremely clear.
-
YOU are incapable of keeping to the facts. You and every Trump-supporting, Trump dick sucking goofball here. You're all full of
.
"Trump's documents were in a secure area under his house at Mara Lago, under Secret Service protection. He also did whatever he was told to do to make them even more secure."
That's absolute bullshit...they WERE, as these photos PROVE, far from secure at all and NOT under Secret Service protection. The Secret Service would also NOT have any business "protecting" federal documents like that. Their business is the protection of sitting and former POTUS's.Are these documents "secure" on a stage in a ballroom? NOT!
Are these documents "secure" in a fuckin' BATHROOM? Right around the toilet? NOT!
Are these documents "secure" spilled out all over a storage room floor? NOT!!
"Slam fuckin' DUNK right there."
Biden and Pence didn't INTENTIONALLY and KNOWINGLY withhold documents when asked to turn them over , much less LIE about them. Trump DID. They turned them over to the National Archives when asked for them. Trump DIDN'T and he LIED about them.
Another "Slam fuckin' DUNK right there."
-
@raphjd What @cinemacapman said as well as EVERY reputable legal expert who isn't a paid mouthpiece for Fox.
Sorry, mate. You are just dead wrong on this one as the grand jury said.
-
Former Presidents take documents and put them in their libraries.
I'm curious where previous Presidents kept documents.
US Senators and VPs do not have the authority to declassify documents, unless your name is Biden, at least according to liberals.
I guess you are claiming that keeping documents in a garage of a house you are renting to a crackhead is "secured". You know, the ones that could be seen/photoed every time the big garage door was opened.
This is where you post some idiotic shit Joy Reid told you.
Your extreme hatred of Fox shows you are a blatant liberal with extreme TDS.
Let's not forget that it was your liberal media that lies about everything.
-
Keep petting yourselves, libs. BIDEN. TOOK. FOREIGN. BRIBES.
And is going down.
And stole election, is illegitimate fraud.
And arrested his chief opponent, proving opponent right & voiding USA claim to "democracy".
And wears Depends.
And mishandled 10x classified material of Trump - except wait it's "infinity x" because Trump mishandled zero, was President, had automatic-inherent declass power (VP Biden didn't), plus, Presidential Records Act makes records he takes out in final days his personal property - as with Clinton, Obama, Bush. Yup.
Jack Smith is known for bad prosecutions based on terrible misunderstandings of law.
Biden is known for taking foreign bribes in exchange for policy......
and, still investigated, but just maybe, in exchange for.... um.... wait for it.... classified documents.
Justice comes for everybody. In Banana Republic like failing USA, it may take long. But it comes.
So have fun libs!
Enjoy your final party while it lasts because it won't!
HAHAHAHAhahahahahahaaha!@raphjd Whenever a lib goes on about Fox, I feel sorry for them. So far behind. So clueless.
-
@raphjd said in USSA watch: Biden took foreign bribe, so indict Trump:
Your extreme hatred of Fox shows you are a blatant liberal with extreme TDS.
Let's not forget that it was your liberal media that lies about everything.Wrong. My hatred for Fox is indicative of my respect for real journalism. Call it a professional interest. And again you're assuming; just because I hate Fox does not mean I love MSNBC. I like news, not opinions. Just give me the facts and I will draw my own conclusions. There is absolutely no defense whatsoever for Murdoch and his brand of strictly-for-profit, tabloid, fear-mongering, dishonest shit. He has single-handedly destroyed politics in America. It has been horrible to watch.
-
@jaroonn You are spot-on as usual. I can't believe the bullshit raphjd and blarblarg spew. It's the typical, usual made-up crap nonsense Trump supporters and arsehole Rethuglicans spew...no matter WHAT facts are presented to them.
Good luck, right-wingers...Trump is FINISHED and will likely spend the rest of his miserable and pathetic existence in JAIL.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login