Something Trump is wrong about..
-
I have two real examples of how such thinking could have gone very wrong:
So.. with big charges, comes a big threshold for accurate and credible evidence.
The bolded is correct. That doesn't prove or disprove anything. What your saying is the law works fine and so we can proceed to execute criminals for executable offences.
-
I have two real examples of how such thinking could have gone very wrong:
So.. with big charges, comes a big threshold for accurate and credible evidence.
The bolded is correct. That doesn't prove or disprove anything. What your saying is the law works fine and so we can proceed to execute criminals for executable offences.
Don't make statements about what I am saying.. especially when that is NOT what I am saying at all.
The low does not work fine. The police are incompetent and corrupt.. as is the judicial system.
What I'm saying is that before even considering executing someone, there must be a competent and fair judicial system. That has never existed.
This goes back to what #1 was saying.. in that he agrees with the death penalty in theory, but not in practice. If the system of justice was fair and competent, then he would be OK with executions. I'm not OK with executions under any circumstances. For one thing dead people feel no pain nor remorse. -
I have two real examples of how such thinking could have gone very wrong:
1. ….f that girl had any credibility at all, my dad would have been put in jail. It was so absurd that the police laughed at her.2. …It turned out that the person who really was the child molester had a name which was 1 letter different than mine, and he was black as black gets. I never got an apology from the police. If that molester had been white, they would not have realized the mistake...
So.. with big charges, comes a big threshold for accurate and credible evidence.
Is this what you're talking about?
In both scenarios, everything worked out fine. The second assertion is speculation and justification for white privilege. The law worked (except for our made up black man).
Be careful in naming yourself number two unless you're just taking the piss out of number one. ::)
The rest of what you said is fine. We disagree. The justice system isn't perfect and can never be. Now tell me how you feel about the number of repeat offenders and their victims? Lord knows I've had to talk endlessly about the people I've hypothetically killed, it's your turn.
-
If you want to whine about ad hominem attacks, maybe you should go back and reread your posts, especially to me.
++++
You are willing to execute innocent men to prevent some other men from committing a crime, but you can't see how fucked up that is.
You don't care about fixing prosecutorial misconduct, etc, etc, etc. You just want to punish innocent men. Misandry much?
You are willing to ignore police corruption like we saw in the OJ case. You don't give a fuck that police plant evidence. You don't give a fuck that evidence was left to cook in a hot crime scene van. Not to mention all the other shit that happened in that case.
Your stance is also extremely classist since only the extremely wealthy can afford a good legal team to keep them out of prison, let alone being executed. We could also call it racist since, as we here from black identitarians, "POCs" are poor and whites are wealthy.
You still haven't answered the question. In your mind, saving the life of 1 person is worth how many lives of innocent men? What's the acceptable ratio for you?
Are you gonna follow feminists and say that for every 1,000 rapes, we need to imprison 1,000 men, regardless of the fact that most rapes rape part of a serial thing, not one-off rapes? Ok yeah, that changes with the modern redefining everything rape, but that is a different thread.
Are you gonna go down the JUST BELIEVE route, despite the fact that we know that people lie?
You don't want to execute people for being gay, but you want to execute people for simply existing because someone else might commit a crime.
++++
What makes me a better person than you is that I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes that it prevents crimes.
"The Boy Next Door" serial killer killed at least 10 people in about 4 different states. Chicago PD was gonna pin it on someone else, which you would support because, in your warped mind, it would stop the real killer or someone else from committing a crime. Even the LAPD pinned it on the wrong guy, but let him out of jail when more murders happened with the same MO. Catching the real killer was a fluke and linking him to the other cases was even a bigger fluke. You'd be happy if 10 people got executed for the 10 known murders he committed.
I'm also against willful wrongdoing in the "justice" system, unlike you.
In every scenario you used, I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes it prevents crimes. As fucked up as the crimes you used are, it's even worse to murder innocent men in hopes that it prevents crimes they had nothing to do with.
You support murdering innocent men. I do not.
You want to take the focus off murdering innocent men because it does make you look like a vile asshole. "Don't look at that part, just think of the victims it'll save". Umm, feminists use that exact same argument to justify their JUST BELIEVE bullshit. You and they, both, have a totally fucked up way of "crime prevention".
Oddly, you don't use actual crime stats and target the people with the highest violent crime rates and murder the entire group. Of course, this would be RACIST, but does that really matter in your worldview of crime prevention? 3% to 5% (13-40 yo black males) of the US population commit 50% of all the violent crime.
This links into your stance on abortion. You don't care about abortion being a racist issue (not even counting the "blacks are weeds that need exterminating" comment of PP's founder). Blacks have the highest abortion rate.
So, why are you so scared to be in favor of killing blacks men en masse, but you have no problem with blacks having abortions at such high rates?
-
If you want to whine about ad hominem attacks, maybe you should go back and reread your posts, especially to me.
Show me. Show my ad hominem attacks. I'll wait. I want to see them.
What makes me a better person than you is that I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes that it prevents crimes.
Your words continue to just blow me away.
Every SJW and feminist you despise speak in the exact same way. Do you really not see how you are the very people claim to hate? I've yet to see you rise above them – and I've been waiting.
In every scenario you used, I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes it prevents crimes. As fucked up as the crimes you used are, **it's even worse to murder innocent men in hopes that it prevents crimes they had nothing to do with. **
Three pages of discussion and you finally answer the question I posted at the beginning of page one. Thank you. You want the guilty to roam free. I could do more with this. Maybe later.
You are willing to execute innocent men to prevent some other men from committing a crime, but you can't see how fucked up that is.
You don't care about fixing prosecutorial misconduct, etc, etc, etc. You just want to punish innocent men.
ok at that part, just think of the victims it'll save". Umm, feminists use that exact same argument to justify their JUST BELIEVE bullshit. You and they, both, have a totally fucked up way of "crime prevention"._You ware willing to set guilty men free to prevent the possibility of an innocent man going to prison setting up the situation for innocent people outside the prison to be attacked, murdered, robbed but you can't see how fucked up that is.
You don't care about fixing prosecutorial misconduct, etc, etc, etc that frees these assholes. You just want to free guilty men.
Okay at that part, just think of the rare innocent man not being jailed. Umm, feminists use that exact same argument to justify there SJW agenda. You and they, both, have a totally fucked up way of "protecting people"._
And so with this kind of rhetoric, we can go round and round in circles and accomplish nothing. Or, you could leave your baggage at the door; you could stop trying to associate feminism with Every Single Argument; and you could stop making untrue allegations – I don't advocate murdering or incarcerating innocent men.There's not much more to discuss in what you wrote. You feely ignore most of what I write, so no guilt on my end.
I await the list of my ad hominem attacks.
-
Are you really that pathetic that you don't realize what you said? For one, you called me a teenager. But whatever, we'll just let you run with it to justify your call to execute innocent men.
++++
Umm, you and they (SJWs and feminists) want to imprison/execute innocent men.
++++
LOL, you want to murder innocent men, but I'm the bad guy in your fucked up head.
You haven't called for fixing the "justice" system like I have. Instead, you call for murdering innocent men.
You think that murdering innocent men (let us not play the politeness game of calling "executing", it's murder) because someone else might be prevented from committing a crime.
You are advocating murder by proxy.
I honestly hope someone you care about is murdered for a crime they didn't commit.
Do you masturbate to stories of lynchings? It's the same thing you are advocating, just done by the state.
-
Are you really that pathetic that you don't realize what you said? For one, you called me a teenager. But whatever, we'll just let you run with it to justify your call to execute innocent men.
I see. You don't know what an ad hominem argument is. I'm not trying to attack your character to win an argument – I'm not even trying to win. Up to this point, I've more or less curious just how it is you present your ideas. I said the way you speak here is like a teenager, or that I have no proof that you're not a teenager based on how you argue. That's true. I've given you several suggestions to help you sound more adult.
In short, you threw out hackneyed insults and thought you made a point. You didn't. Worse, you didn't improve yourself or me.
What I see is a very young person who uses the exact same logic patterns of the people they claim to be against -- It's boring. -- we're going round in circles, and so you and I are done with this topic.
(On the plus side, when you agree with someone you write reasonably well. Work on how you disagree.)
-
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
-
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
-
@Icc:
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
The one burning is you, Icc. There is a big RED fire burning below your name. You should win some prize for being the biggest vagina on the site. Nobody has been able to get such a miserable reputation so fast. You only have 350megs of uploads and 1 GB of downloads. Why are you even on this site?
-
@Icc:
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
At least I'm not a coward who's afraid to state my views.
You only pop in to sling a few insults at those who aren't SJWs like yourself, but you are too much of a coward to state your views on any topics.
:police: As I said before, either leave this section or post something worthwhile. If not, you could get muted for posting spam. :police:
-
@Icc:
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
The one burning is you, Icc. There is a big RED fire burning below your name. You should win some prize for being the biggest vagina on the site. Nobody has been able to get such a miserable reputation so fast. You only have 350megs of uploads and 1 GB of downloads. Why are you even on this site?
Cuz the download rules here suuuuuuuuuuuck. 12 points a day? Cap the number of downlaods? Upload but almost no credit? Tried to get points in the forum but that suuuuuuucks too cuz people most here are aholes ina circle jerk. Been reading posts in the car with my friends making fun of you all bcuz your all so pround of what you write but zero sense.
Wanna view? DP is rare. The system is unfare bcuz white priv and money and so you wont be affecte anyway.
Next step youll call me names and blow eachother.
-
@Icc:
@Icc:
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
The one burning is you, Icc. There is a big RED fire burning below your name. You should win some prize for being the biggest vagina on the site. Nobody has been able to get such a miserable reputation so fast. You only have 350megs of uploads and 1 GB of downloads. Why are you even on this site?
Cuz the download rules here suuuuuuuuuuuck. 12 points a day? Cap the number of downlaods? Upload but almost no credit? Tried to get points in the forum but that suuuuuuucks too cuz people most here are aholes ina circle jerk. Been reading posts in the car with my friends making fun of you all bcuz your all so pround of what you write but zero sense.
Wanna view? DP is rare. The system is unfare bcuz white priv and money and so you wont be affecte anyway.
Next step youll call me names and blow eachother.
LOL, too stupid to realize just how much of a hypocrite you really are.
If the site sucks as much as you claim, then leave. No one is holding you hostage.
So, you are one of those anti-white racists we've been talking about. Great, good to know.
It's funny how you try to insult me when my veiws on the justice system would help non whites, whereas you are siding with a person who doesn't care how many innocent people are killed by the state. Of course, you are too stupid to see that.
I do get it though, you are butthurt about your not being able to download porn, so it's the white man keeping you down. Poor, poor thing.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login