Manual Upload : test #1
-
Hi Mods,
After reading Uwe's last post in the french section, I really would like to test the "Manual Upload" found in GT Menu.
I never uploaded anything manually, as I gladly used the couple QTM/uTorrent since day 1, when I discovered that whole torrent thing on July 31th 2010, but I'm so curious to see how it will go manually !It will be a "test upload" that I will delete immediately after it starts to seed, just a little file, a couple of silly pics, any description…and the manual re-download of the torrent which is essential at the end of the process.
Guess I'll name it "Test #1 to be deleted : please don't download"
tia
-
Well - after some time: Did the manual upload work for you? I'm glad you discovered the easiness of QTM/uTorrent so early

-
Hi Mgr

Yes, the manual upload worked finely, as shown in the 7 pictures found in the french support Forum, here :
http://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=13015.msg55419#msg55419The reason why I tested the manual upload was to help tennisso in the french forum and also because I was very curious to try it, he gave me that occasion, thanks tennisso !
But even if it worked, QTM is much (much) simpler and quicker : I wish all Windows members could try QTM at least once, but maybe many members never heard about QTM ?
Which makes me think of this (please correct me if I'm wrong) :
When a torrent is created and sent to the tracker, GT knows if this torrent has been created with QTM, right ?
(because it seems to me that when I download some GT torrents, I read in my client program, before downloading : "this torrent has been created with QTM 1.3")My question is : why isn't the client program used by the torrent creator indicated in the torrent ?
It seems strange that this important point isn't mandatory in the protocols. And it would help you a lot in the Forum : just read how many times Mods have to ask users : "ok your fresh upload didn't work, please indicate us what client program are you using ?" -
Well - a bit off topic though - but nonetheless:
The current client program has nothing to do with the program that created the torrent itself, you can seed a torrent with whichever client you like - so that asked question question still makes sense (although staff can see which program is actively seeding/leeching a torrent when the program is actively seeding/leeching [nb]although there is another problem with this information: some (cheating) clients try to make their own tracks invisible and don't announce their ID to our tracker - which is a break of the rules for the BitTorrent protocol, some others allow you to fake either a well known existing ID of another program or let the user set an own ID :([/nb]). QTM uses a (non mandatory) comment field in the torrent file to mark the origin of that torrent - but the content of that comment is not clearly "defined"
Nonetheless: what sense does it make when you know which program created the torrent file? Not much if you ask me - there is no additional diagnosis in this information. Just a possibility to gather a statistic about how many of our torrents were created by QTM. -
Thanks Mgr

Right, in fact I had in mind the client program used during seeding/leeching
I'm glad you wrote "staff can see which program is actively seeding/leeching a torrent when the program is actively seeding/leeching[1])" , even if "there is another problem with this information"
What made me think of this question are topics like this one :
http://community.gaytor.rent/index.php?topic=4209.msg12664#msg12664 -
…
I'm glad you wrote "staff can see which program is actively seeding/leeching a torrent when the program is actively seeding/leeching[1])" , even if "there is another problem with this information"
…That is only one of our problems. The next problem is that users often do not have a clue how to set their clients, to close them properly, …
And even to a simple question like "which torrent client do you use" is often answered with "Windows media player".

-
@mgr:
And even to a simple question like "which torrent client do you use" is often answered with "Windows media player".

Are you trying to say that "Windows media player" isn't the right answer ?
Omg I was soooo mistaken :cry2: ;D
Hugs :hug2: -
:lolp:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login