Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House

[raphjd]

@hubrys

There was never a "don't say gay law". It was something you people made up in your headsbecause you want to groom kids.

You also called ma an asshole because I'm against giving k-5 kids pornography.

[blablarg18]

@raphjd Word "homophobic" is ironic becuz people who speak it most, themselves show phobia symptoms.

@hubrys is afraid.

Your starter comment here didn't "celebrate" - He hallucinated that.

Pressed for what triggered his hallucinations, he came up with

1. Many years ago, Johnson wrote in support of opinions also held by hubrys-idols Obama, Biden, Hillary & Bill.

2. Other people fear Johnson too, from similar crap in their heads.

Do we need a new word? Homophobiaphobia.

Even if - 100% hypothetical, imaginary - Johnson went homophobic now, so what?

It would get about as far as that time Jeff Sessions tried to shut down weed - remember that? - no, because it went nowhere.

UNLESS of course, USA has no free speech - as appears to be case under DEM rule / Biden Regime.

Free speech is everyone's refuge - and today, is most threatened & limited by libs.

So hubrys falls back to: Well Repubs don't like groomers. And THAT restricts speech or is homophobic, uhhh, somehow.

Which, pathetically, circles the discussion back to real issue for these libs:

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Another fake Christian and Trump-asslicking traitor. More like this guy, please. They are serving the GOP brand very well.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Forcing a child to say the Pledge of Allegiance, to pray, to go to church....that's grooming.

Allowing a child to have an honest conversation about their feelings is adult and humane. But not a right-wing priority, of course.

[blablarg18]

Today news: Speaker Mike wants to continue USA-Ukraine money laundering op.

Even though Ukraine corrupt af, & also lost, & Israel more important rn, & USA in bad shape / in great need of aid from itself.

As I said. Many conservatives oppose him or skeptical of him - for various reasons.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

So, you support giving K-5 kids pornography, as well as Hubrys.

That's very much a notorious pedo act of grooming.

BTW, I'm an atheist.

[blablarg18]

@raphjd Have to wonder if they were raped/molested as kids? Since they struggle with Generational Boundaries, such a basic concept.

[raphjd]

@blablarg18

This may well be the case.

Studies seem to vary wildly on this. Some say that most pedos were never pouched as kids while others say that most were molested as kids.

I think a lot of modern pedos are just liberals caught up in all the queer crap.

[blablarg18]

@raphjd May well be.

Still, sad examples like Milo - he was molested at 13 I think - and it has taken him decades to sort the concepts involved, & even then, he still shows instability as a person. (Unstable changes of direction, drama addict etc)

It's soooooo important that kids at least hear or get told, "When the grownup came & did this to you, it was very wrong" or "Grownups should never be around you with this matter."

Even if the words change nothing, they still help the kid build internal mental boundaries & sort the concepts right.

[raphjd]

@blablarg18

Sadly, liberals want to normalize fucking kids. That's why they created MAP (Minor Attracted Person).

It's similar to normalizing criminal by calling them "justice-involved persons" instead of criminals.

[hubrys]

I believe that the people propounding the Grooming Libel are doing so because they care for children about as much as I believe the racists propounding the Blood Libel against Jews just care about protecting Christian babies.

The Grooming Libel is just political correctness cover for being an open homophobe. It's a dog whistle. The true goal is to oppress homosexuals, and they'll use "protecting children" as the pretextual justification.

Do some gays molest children? Sure. However, the vast, vast, vast majority of sexual molestation of underage children is heterosexual. Why does it seem like the conservatives are only concerned with male/male grooming?

For example, where's the outrage at Matt Gaetz for paying for underage and "barely legal" prostitutes using his public VENMO account? I guess you can fuck an underage girl so long as you're an older man.

[raphjd]

@hubrys

You got angry and called me an asshole because I'm against giving K-5 kids pornography.

First you accused me of being a liar, but when I posted links about 2 schools having in the library available to look at, you called me an asshole.

Why were you so angry that I am against that?

I also see that yo are the one equating grooming with being gay. That makes YOU the homophobe.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Your quantum leap from my supporting children being able to ask questions about sexuality to "giving them pornography" pretty much sums up the complete weakness of most far-right "arguments." Are you willfully disingenuous? Completely unable to see gray? Or do you just love speaking in bumper stickers?

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

It was your side that put the porn in schools and it is youside that gets angry when we question it.

How many threads do we need to have to show the school board screech "that's obscene" when a parent reads from one of the books in the school library. If the book is ok for a K-5 school library, then it should be equally ok for a school board meeting.

I will give you credit though, at least you aren't linking being gay with being a pedo.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:

I will give you credit though, at least you aren't linking being gay with being a pedo.

No. That's what your side does.

Your hammering the porn thing is tiresome. No one supports that. It's a boogieman, like CRT, late-term abortions, floods of immigrants, crippling inflation and all the other rot you lot regurgitate in order to avoid a serious discussion.

It's all "your side" with you. It's sophomoric and pointless.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

Actually, you are very wrong.

Your side deems any hatred of pedos to be hatred of LGBTs.

Your side created Minor Attracted Person, in hopes to normalize it.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:

Your side created Minor Attracted Person, in hopes to normalize it.

Now you are just embarrassing yourself.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

How?

Your side did create MAP to normalize pedos.

[blablarg18]

@raphjd Yes, MAP, also don't forget "pansexual".

We def had a thread where @jaroonn tried to have "pansexual" in official LGBTQ+blahbarf acronym.

But if you fuck consenting adults: Bisexual, Trans & Queer already cover idea that you'll fuck all kinds.

ONLY reason to push "pansexual" then, is............... if you don't fuck consenting adults. If you normalize fucking kids & animals. If.

It can hardly be doubted that Pedos & other Predators & Perverts, see acronym 'P' and go "haha we made everyone say it's pansexual snicker snicker - it's us"

[hubrys]

@raphjd The Groomer Libel is homophobic because the proponents of it, including yourself, support things like "Don't Say Gay" bills. Such bills are explicitly homophobic.

For example, under Florida's bill young children could be read the following book by their teacher in school:

But those same students could NOT be read this book:

And the only difference between the two books is that the first one features a heteronormative family unit, and the second one does not. That's a bigoted policy.

Teaching children about the existence of LGBT families doesn't involve pornography. It no more involves discussing ass fucking than talking about mommies and daddies involves talking about pussy pounding.