Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House
-
2004
-
2005
Too bad he was a frequent opinion writer. Just google and I'm sure you can find many more than I did in just 5 minutes of searching.
-
@hubrys 2004. Ooh, 19 years instead of 20. You got within Scott Adams' (not my) 20-year limit.
In other words: You have no idea what Speaker Mike in 2023 would do about gays, or how far it would get, whatever it was. None.
Wonder if I should even clue you in to the fact that a great many conservatives oppose him or are at least very skeptical, for various reasons?
Again - "celebrating" - was you hallucination.
-
-
Which ignores most of what I said.
So funny to see you think you have some great point when really u spew ur own insanity & fear.
Reminds me of our original encounter when u thought, with ZERO evidence or reason whatever, that MTG had swatted herself & should be arrested.
Another thing Scott Adams says is: MSNBC & CNN should be watched with a laugh track. They're comedies about people who just don't understand a thing.
I read your comments with a laugh track
One thing Speaker Mike has: he seems to be relatively pro-free speech. A GREAT DEAL more than you @hubrys are.
We will have to see if it holds up. But to repeat: "Seems". (And "we'll see.")
And free speech cancels homophobia.
-
@blablarg18 said in Rep. Mike Johnson elected 56th Speaker of the House:
One thing Speaker Mike has: he seems to be relatively pro-free speech.
Yup, the author and lead sponsor of the Federal "Don't Say Gay" bill is very pro-free speech. </irony>
-
There was never a "don't say gay law". It was something you people made up in your headsbecause you want to groom kids.
You also called ma an asshole because I'm against giving k-5 kids pornography.
-
@raphjd Word "homophobic" is ironic becuz people who speak it most, themselves show phobia symptoms.
@hubrys is afraid.
Your starter comment here didn't "celebrate" - He hallucinated that.
Pressed for what triggered his hallucinations, he came up with
-
Many years ago, Johnson wrote in support of opinions also held by hubrys-idols Obama, Biden, Hillary & Bill.
-
Other people fear Johnson too, from similar crap in their heads.
Do we need a new word? Homophobiaphobia.
Even if - 100% hypothetical, imaginary - Johnson went homophobic now, so what?
It would get about as far as that time Jeff Sessions tried to shut down weed - remember that? - no, because it went nowhere.
UNLESS of course, USA has no free speech - as appears to be case under DEM rule / Biden Regime.
Free speech is everyone's refuge - and today, is most threatened & limited by libs.
So hubrys falls back to: Well Repubs don't like groomers. And THAT restricts speech or is homophobic, uhhh, somehow.
Which, pathetically, circles the discussion back to real issue for these libs:
![1698252136461-gag[1].jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1698410863503-1698252136461-gag-1.jpg)
-
-
@raphjd Another fake Christian and Trump-asslicking traitor. More like this guy, please. They are serving the GOP brand very well.
-
@raphjd Forcing a child to say the Pledge of Allegiance, to pray, to go to church....that's grooming.
Allowing a child to have an honest conversation about their feelings is adult and humane. But not a right-wing priority, of course.
-
Today news: Speaker Mike wants to continue USA-Ukraine money laundering op.
Even though Ukraine corrupt af, & also lost, & Israel more important rn, & USA in bad shape / in great need of aid from itself.
As I said. Many conservatives oppose him or skeptical of him - for various reasons.
-
So, you support giving K-5 kids pornography, as well as Hubrys.
That's very much a notorious pedo act of grooming.
BTW, I'm an atheist.
-
@raphjd Have to wonder if they were raped/molested as kids? Since they struggle with Generational Boundaries, such a basic concept.
-
This may well be the case.
Studies seem to vary wildly on this. Some say that most pedos were never pouched as kids while others say that most were molested as kids.
I think a lot of modern pedos are just liberals caught up in all the queer crap.
-
@raphjd May well be.
Still, sad examples like Milo - he was molested at 13 I think - and it has taken him decades to sort the concepts involved, & even then, he still shows instability as a person. (Unstable changes of direction, drama addict etc)
It's soooooo important that kids at least hear or get told, "When the grownup came & did this to you, it was very wrong" or "Grownups should never be around you with this matter."
Even if the words change nothing, they still help the kid build internal mental boundaries & sort the concepts right.
-
Sadly, liberals want to normalize fucking kids. That's why they created MAP (Minor Attracted Person).
It's similar to normalizing criminal by calling them "justice-involved persons" instead of criminals.
-
I believe that the people propounding the Grooming Libel are doing so because they care for children about as much as I believe the racists propounding the Blood Libel against Jews just care about protecting Christian babies.
The Grooming Libel is just political correctness cover for being an open homophobe. It's a dog whistle. The true goal is to oppress homosexuals, and they'll use "protecting children" as the pretextual justification.
Do some gays molest children? Sure. However, the vast, vast, vast majority of sexual molestation of underage children is heterosexual. Why does it seem like the conservatives are only concerned with male/male grooming?
For example, where's the outrage at Matt Gaetz for paying for underage and "barely legal" prostitutes using his public VENMO account? I guess you can fuck an underage girl so long as you're an older man.
-
You got angry and called me an asshole because I'm against giving K-5 kids pornography.
First you accused me of being a liar, but when I posted links about 2 schools having in the library available to look at, you called me an asshole.
Why were you so angry that I am against that?
I also see that yo are the one equating grooming with being gay. That makes YOU the homophobe.
-
@raphjd Your quantum leap from my supporting children being able to ask questions about sexuality to "giving them pornography" pretty much sums up the complete weakness of most far-right "arguments." Are you willfully disingenuous? Completely unable to see gray? Or do you just love speaking in bumper stickers?
-
It was your side that put the porn in schools and it is youside that gets angry when we question it.
How many threads do we need to have to show the school board screech "that's obscene" when a parent reads from one of the books in the school library. If the book is ok for a K-5 school library, then it should be equally ok for a school board meeting.
I will give you credit though, at least you aren't linking being gay with being a pedo.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login