The march toward fascism continues.

[jaroonn]

@blablarg18 You chose the most appropriate moniker.

[MrMazda]

@blablarg18 Yeah.... It's a sad and strange world that we live in at this day and age. It really makes me wonder how some people manage to reproduce. There should be a universal law in all countries that says that if both parents have the combined IQ of a potato, they should not be allowed to reproduce. That would solve much of the issues we're having at this day and age.

When it comes to riots, looting, arson, etc. people don't bat an eye, but the moment that religious belief comes into the picture, all shit seems to hit the fan and everyone goes into some kind of satanic panic as it was once called back in the day.

[jaroonn]

@blablarg18 It doesn't matter if people were offended. Isn't that the whole point of the Right's "Cancel Culture" crusade (First Amendment and all that?). The Right is only concerned about "cancelling" conservative voices. They don't give a rat's ass about anyone else's. Ask librarians in Florida and Texas, asswipe (alleged).

[MrMazda]

@jaroonn Cancel culture is all about promoting a bullshit agenda. It's all about "we're allowed to say and do as we please, but you can't because it doesn't agree with our views".

What sickens me is just how far some people will go to force their beliefs or views down the throats of other people's, while simultaneously trying to silence and deny any view, thought, or expression that doesn't fit their narrative.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

Lots of people have cancel culture embedded in laws.

As Jordan Peterson said some years ago, when he originally made the news, he was not against using preferred pronouns but he was against state mandated speech.

Strangely, you people have no problem with laws that prevent LGBTs from saying "hate speech" against believers, as long as they are not Christians or jews, while the same hate speech laws allow believers to use their religion to spew hate speech against us. This is the case in Scotland and some other European countries. You have no problem when non-whites go on anti-white racist rants, but lose your minds when a white person criticizes that non-white for their racist rants.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd As you assume to know what I believe or what drives me crazy, or you think that it is logical to lump me into a group of "you people," there really is no point in pretending we are having a worthwhile discussion. What really drives me crazy is trying to have a rational discussion with a blind zealot. You not only lack substance in your arguments, but also erroneously presume that everyone is as mule-headedly dogmatic as you seem to b

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

I noticed that you didn't respond to the fact that YOU PEOPLE embedded cancel culture into laws, throughout the western world.

YOU PEOPLE did that, not conservatives.

YOU PEOPLE mandated speech that YOU PEOPLE like.

Pornographic books in elementary schools is what YOU PEOPLE fight for and are angry that conservatives don't want that.

YOU PEOPLE won't condemn dirty politicians on your side, but get butt hurt and screechy over losers like Santos, whom conservatives have condemned.

Until you and the rest of the liberals here start condemning things done by liberals, then it will remain YOU PEOPLE.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd said in The march toward fascism continues.:

I noticed that you didn't respond to the fact that YOU PEOPLE embedded cancel culture into laws, throughout the western world.

I am not in favor of any form of censorship.

Pornographic books in elementary schools is what YOU PEOPLE fight for and are angry that conservatives don't want that.

I challenge you to provide one example of a pornographic book First Amendment Supporters condone being in elementary schools. Just one.

YOU PEOPLE won't condemn dirty politicians on your side, but get butt hurt and screechy over losers like Santos, whom conservatives have condemned.

Al Franken resigned. Santos is still in Congress. And a convicted sex criminal may be headed to the White House.

Until you and the rest of the liberals here start condemning things done by liberals, then it will remain YOU PEOPLE

And here you prove my point. You have no idea what I condemn or don't condemn. But you know what? I don't give a shit. I left the US years ago when I saw what was happening as YOU PEOPLE started taking over. YOU PEOPLE ignore experts, scientists, highly-educated academics and instead deify idiots. Who are your heroes? Who are your role-models? What great thinkers are currently associated with the Right? The GOP has become the party of mediocre numbskulls. You've got no one who is even remotely mammal to rally behind. But I don't care. I can just watch from afar and thank GOD I don't have to be a part of the mess. I wish you all the best and a government full of Trumps, Boebberts, Greenes, Jordans, and McCarthys. Good luck...you deserve whatever comes.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

The books were already discussed here and info provided. @hubrys even called me an asshole over it. You can look for the discussion yourself.

Umm, YOU PEOPLE love to play the "science" game. You only support the science that suits your agenda.

YOU PEOPLE screech "my body my choice" while demanding that you control our bodies.

It's comical having you list names of Repubs, while having AOC and countless others in the DNC.

You really are sad and pathetic.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd AOC is a rock star compared to anything you have. I have no interest in your body or trying to control it. How do liberals try to control your body? How do you define "pornography" (oh, the irony).

Science is science. Facts are facts. Don't be one of those too stupid to see that.

Thanks you for your concern as to my well-being, but I am extremely happy that I am no longer living in that shitshow of a country. All the best!

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

AOC has 2 BSs Economics and International Relations. She doesn't know anything about either.

Clearly, you are too stupid to understand the difference between pornography in an elementary school library and it being available to adults.

Then again, you could be a pedo and you don't understand the difference.

"Science is science" until it disagrees with the liberal agenda. YOU PEOPLE pick and choose.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd "Stupid" should be a goal for you.

[raphjd]

@jaroonn

You are the one who's confused about the difference between pornography in an elementary school library vs on a porn site for consenting adults.

[jaroonn]

@raphjd Pornography should not be allowed in elementary schools. All my friends and family are liberals, many of them school teachers, and not one would disagree with that.

[blablarg18]

@jaroonn

---

Note: Many other examples are possible.

Science is clear, for example, that by week 11 unborn child has face, brain, heartbeat & tries to defend itself in anguish when the abortionist goes in to murder it.

Libs ignore that science, though.

To libs, concepts like "science", "my body my choice", "rights", "freedom" are dead pelts to be claimed as trophies & worn for cosplay.

[jaroonn]

@blablarg18 Completely irrelevant. The disagreement over choice is not a question of science; it's a question of morality. If you believe in God and a soul and believe the soul enters the whatever when the egg is penetrated by the sperm, then I totally understand why you'd disagree with abortion. I get it. But we don't live in a theocracy, and certainly not one dominated by one particular sect. So the question remains, when is it morally ok to abort a fetus? No one seems to be able to agree on that, But it has nothing to do with science. Science does not attempt to define when an embryo "becomes human." Science cannot prove the existence or non-existence of a "soul." That's why this is such a contentious issue.

[blablarg18]

"disagreement over choice is not a question of science" - Sure it is.

You libs always say "It's just a clump of cells! It can't feel!"

Which is true in the first few hours or days. Maybe first month.

The rest of the time it's factually, scientifically FALSE.

As in, FALSE STATEMENT.

UNSCIENTIFIC.

Mid- to late- term abortion is, and someday will be viewed widely, as a horrific human rights violation. More horrific than slavery.

And no amount of transing will ever change the chromosomes.

Nor give women penises that work, or even prostates.

Nor give men wombs & ovaries.

[jaroonn]

@blablarg18 said in The march toward fascism continues.:

You libs always say "It's just a clump of cells! It can't feel!"

I've never said that in my life nor know anyone who has. I admitted that this is a very complicated issue, and that I can see both sides. My personal belief is that as I will never be confronted with this problem, it's none of my business. I think women should decide this one. Unfortunately, as is many cases, men think they know better. And by the way, your hysterical asserting feelings as facts does not win any argument. Abortion is worse than slavery!!!! Please.....

[blablarg18]

@jaroonn It's telling, how you skipped/conceded "Science is clear...that by week 11 unborn child has face, brain, heartbeat & tries to defend itself in anguish when the abortionist goes in to murder it."

You Do. Not. Care. - about unborn child's feelings nor objective fact of murder.

Every abortion ends in death. Termination of a life operating physically from its own DNA. A killing.

Every. One.

And how would you know I'm not a woman?

Transphobic much?

You don't know what my gender is, whether bio or identified now or identified in past. Because I've never said.

You may have an assumption or guess. But that's different from knowing. Or else tell how u know.

[jaroonn]

@blablarg18 said in The march toward fascism continues.:

@jaroonn It's telling, how you skipped/conceded "Science is clear...that by week 11 unborn child has face, brain, heartbeat & tries to defend itself in anguish when the abortionist goes in to murder it."

I didn't "skip" this. I am not an embryologist, so choose not to pretend I know. "The science is clear" does make me suspect that this was not written by an actual scientist, however. I don't think it can be determined that an eleven-week old fetus has the ability to "defend itself in anguish" when a new born child cannot do the same. Does the fetus lose intelligence as time goes on? Maybe you should add that to your research "to-do" list.

You Do. Not. Care. - about unborn child's feelings nor objective fact of murder.

Methinks you presume, madam. Or sir.

Every abortion ends in death. Termination of a life operating physically from its own DNA. A killing.

True.

Every. One.

Still true.

And how would you know I'm not a woman?

I don't sir. Or madam. Never said I did. I just said that I think women should decide this.

Transphobic much?

Not at all.

You don't know what my gender is, whether bio or identified now or identified in past. Because I've never said.

Covered above.

You may have an assumption or guess. But that's different from knowing. Or else tell how u know.

From what I've seen from the majority of your posts, you'd be wise to follow your own advice.