Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report

[raphjd]

@Spintendo

If you want people to mind their own business, then why go on Twitter to brag that you are having a baby suck on your man titties?

If you broadcast your shit to the world, then expect the world to respond.

It's a simple concept that even a domestic terrorist should be able to understand it. But clearly, you don't.

[hubrys]

Just to keep our usual gaggle of transphobes honest, it is possible to pump a man full of enough estrogen and prolactin hormones to make him produce breast milk with a mixture of lactose, proteins, and electrolytes similar to a woman's colostrum or milk. And, of course, the act of breastfeeding is for more than JUST feeding the baby (as some women "breastfeed" even when they fail to produce milk), because of its effects on the baby, i.e., the skin-to-skin contact.

[raphjd]

@hubrys

Anyone who doesn't agree with the lunatic Queer trans agenda, is a transphobe.

Plenty of trans people agree with me.

Not all trans people are freaks.

[blablarg18]

@hubrys "our usual gaggle of transphobes" - In your head of course. Get help.

[MrMazda]

@hubrys You say it yourself.... SIMILAR.... SIMILAR is NOT the same. There is a difference. One is naturally occurring and the other is not.

[Spintendo]

@raphjd said in

If you broadcast your shit to the world, then expect the world to respond.

Wouldn't your Methodist mother-in-law have something different to say about that world response? Those women's Twitter tirades certainly don't appear to follow the creed of "love one's neighbor as oneself".

[raphjd]

@Spintendo

What are you even talking about?

[blablarg18]

@Spintendo Trying to manipulate?

[hubrys]

@MrMazda said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:

You say it yourself.... SIMILAR.... SIMILAR is NOT the same. There is a difference. One is naturally occurring and the other is not.

And you are assuming that similar but different means worse. You are assuming that naturally occurring means better.

Wild almonds are natural, but I'd much rather eat the genetically modified cultured almonds that don't have enough cyanide in them to kill me. Cultured almonds are similar (same shape, color, texture, and nutritional value) but different (not bitter and not full of poison) to natural almonds.

[MrMazda]

@hubrys I have assumed no such thing. I am merely saying that they are not the same thing, but the problem is that there is no scientific basis to determine one way or the other how it compares, so one should air on the side of caution as the effects of the non naturally occurring version are not known.

[raphjd]

@hubrys said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:

because of its effects on the baby, i.e., the skin-to-skin contact.

Do you need to have a baby suck on your man titties in order to have skin-to-skin contact?

Also, what studies have been done to say that sucking on juiced-up man titty milk is safe for the baby?

[MrMazda]

@raphjd said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:

Also, what studies have been done to say that sucking on juiced-up man titty milk is safe for the baby?

Precisely my point.... While they may be similar, they are not the same thing. As they are not the same thing, a reasonable person would exercise caution as not to harm the baby.

[blablarg18]

Breastfeeding women - real ones - are told to avoid alcohol or wait hours for it to clear from milk.

Yet libs will defend mentally-ill men on massive hormones & God knows what, oozing out some mixture of pus, hormones & God knows what for their own sexual satisfaction.

In a sane world, child services would take away baby - for its protection.