YouTube suspends Sky News Australia
-
I really haven't watched NewsMax.
LOL, you are such a clown. You are the one that said that I could only be a conservative if I supported Romney, McCain, Liz Cheney, etc, etc. So, in your view, conservatives are warhawk scumbags.
Let's not forget, Trump has not violated the US constitution in less than 7 months, like you guy, Honest Joe. He's even done it after a SCOTUS ruling against him.
You didn't like Trump because he bragged, but you love liar Joe because he lies. Can you tell us a job Honest Joe has not claimed to have done?
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
I really haven't watched NewsMax.
LOL, you are such a clown. You are the one that said that I could only be a conservative if I supported Romney, McCain, Liz Cheney, etc, etc. So, in your view, conservatives are warhawk scumbags.
Let's not forget, Trump has not violated the US constitution in less than 7 months, like you guy, Honest Joe. He's even done it after a SCOTUS ruling against him.
You didn't like Trump because he bragged, but you love liar Joe because he lies. Can you tell us a job Honest Joe has not claimed to have done?
Oh, you DO love to substitute your own words for others', don't you.
Lots of Conservatives weren't happy with Romney, McCain, Cheney (either one), and so on... but Republicans supported them (at least Romney & McCain at the Presidential level) - or at least voted for them - because they were the candidate of the Party... the same way many people came 'round to supporting Trump in 2016.
Conservatism is a belief system, not a political party. Trump is not actually a Conservative in a lot of ways (tho he is in some other ways)...
To be clear:
I didn't say you weren't a Conservative, I said you weren't a Republican before Trump! You've spent so much of your energy blindly supporting all things Trump, you've shared precious little of your own political philosophy... so I wouldn't dream of attaching a label to you in that regard...
So:
- Are you a Conservative now? maybe - you claim to be & you certainly stand behind Trump!
- Were you a Conservative pre-2016? maybe - not enough data, but I wouldn't be surprised by that being a solid no...
- Are you a Republican now? I don't think so... I think you're a Trumpite: and if he created a Trump Political Party as a replacement for the Republican Party, you'd go with him without hesitation. (I believe you follow the man, not the Party or the Philosophy)
- Were you a Republican pre-2016? You have made it clear that the answer is a solid NO.
-
Ah, we have to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate, unless it's Orange Man Bad.
Typical liberal mental gymnastics, you got there.
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
Ah, we have to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate, unless it's Orange Man Bad.
Typical liberal mental gymnastics, you got there.
ROFL - I have voted for exactly ONE Democrat in over 40 years:
- Against Trump
I voted for Bush/Quayle in 88 and 92 (even though Dan Quayle never saw a foot too big for his mouth!)
I voted for Dole/Kemp in 96 (with great pride! Dole was a great citizen & patriot!)
I voted for Bush/Cheney in 00 & 04 (even though Dick Cheney was scary as a VP!)
I voted for McCain/Palin in 08 (even though Sarah Palin was a laughing-stock candidate for VP)
I voted for Romney/Ryan in 12 (even though I would have preferred the ticket of Ryan/Romney!)
I voted for Trump/Pence in 16 - because who could possibly vote for another Clinton!But I couldn't overlook Trumpism in 2020 - It was just a bridge-too-far for me!
So if that makes me a liberal - in the mind of a Fascist, Nazi, Trumpite? Sure!
-
And yet, you have not seen a liberal policy that you won't defend.
You said that a Republican always votes for the Republican candidates, regardless. Then you proved that you aren't a Republican because you voted for Honest Joe, not the Republican candidate.
Being a liberal, I know you are too thick to get it.
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
And yet, you have not seen a liberal policy that you won't defend.
You said that a Republican always votes for the Republican candidates, regardless. Then you proved that you aren't a Republican because you voted for Honest Joe, not the Republican candidate.
Being a liberal, I know you are too thick to get it.
I've never said you had to have a 100% Republican voting record to be a Republican... but I do think that if you're over 30 and the FIRST - nay, the ONLY - Republican Presidential Candidate you've ever voted for is Trump, then you're not a Republican, you're a Trumpite.
Those aren't mutually exclusive terms - many Republicans support Trump, but not all Trump supporters are actually Republicans.
Look, my older brother is a Trumpite - in part because he's an Anarchist (believes that ALL kinds of Government are inherently corrupt and bad.) He's not a Republican - and doesn't claim to be - but he still supports Trump (and also believes The Big Lie)... (you can't choose your family!)
I will also add: my brother also believes Trump is corrupt - he just appreciates that he's so open about it! But more importantly, he loves the chaos Trump caused (still causes?)
-
Trump is not the first Repub that I voted for. Sorry to burst your fake Repub bubble.
I voted for Repubs if they weren't homophobes. I never voted for a homophobe. I voted for Repubs as my US Rep.
Just because I don't like scumbag warhawks, doesn't make me a liberal. Hell, you and Peolsi are warhawks. Maybe you should start the Warhawks Swampies political party and see how many from both parties join.
Does your brother drink the DNC Koolaide, like you, that Honest Joe is the "good" guy?
-
I have noticed that our resident fake conservative has derailed this conversation in order to protect his beloved "big tech" from being criticized for being politically biased.
The topic, he doesn't want us talking about, is that YouTube suspended Sky News Australia for posting factual news, at the time of posting, but has now changed according to the WHO, CDC, and whatnot.
YouTube has not done this with liberal outlets that posted the same stuff.
So, why is SNA guilty of spreading false information, the same information that liberal outlets posted at the time, but the liberal outlets are not equally guilty?
SNA posted the "correct" info as the "facts" changed, just like liberal media outlets.
Typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
I have noticed that our resident fake conservative has derailed this conversation in order to protect his beloved "big tech" from being criticized for being politically biased.
The topic, he doesn't want us talking about, is that YouTube suspended Sky News Australia for posting factual news, at the time of posting, but has now changed according to the WHO, CDC, and whatnot.
YouTube has not done this with liberal outlets that posted the same stuff.
So, why is SNA guilty of spreading false information, the same information that liberal outlets posted at the time, but the liberal outlets are not equally guilty?
SNA posted the "correct" info as the "facts" changed, just like liberal media outlets.
Typical liberal hypocrisy.
As a Fascist, Nazi, Trumpite, you should know by now that I am not the straw-man you're looking for...
I know this will be a shock to our outside readers, but to make sure it is clear:
I, personally, have no role in the decision-making in Google-owned YouTube
With that out of the way, let's look at the facts:
- Sky News Australia was not banned from YouTube. What really happened is that one channel of the network was suspended from YouTube for one week for claiming that COVID-19 in Australia "was not serious" and that "lockdowns have not worked."
NOTE: It's hard to find reliable, factual sources for the exact content of the video(s) that triggered the action (called a "strike" by YouTube - it takes 3 strikes in a 90-day period to get you actually banned!)
This would be the equivalent of YouTube temporarily blocking a YouTube re-broadcast of Tucker Carlson (sorry, I'm just picking on him because I know it will inflame @raphjd LOL) for a week.
Sky News Australia is a cable news channel (owned by the same parent company as Fox News in the US, and closely affiliated with the British Sky News network - all Murdoch-family owned outlets).
Losing access to YouTube is far from "canceling" the channel... they still have a small handful of cable-tv (and because things are different in Australia) over-the-air viewers... (he said sarcastically)...
IMHO, YouTube is treating this as a public-health issue, not a free-speech or political one. (Akin to the traditional: yelling FIRE in a crowded theater is illegal because of the extreme danger to public health, not because of a desire to stifle speech about rapid, incandescent, oxidation.)
What's more, by treating Sky News Australia the same as the guy in his garage claiming that "the vaccines are re-programming your DNA so that the deep-state can read your thoughts" - is far less hypocritical than ignoring it - because it's a large news outlet - would have been.
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
Trump is not the first Repub that I voted for. Sorry to burst your fake Repub bubble.
I voted for Repubs if they weren't homophobes. I never voted for a homophobe. I voted for Repubs as my US Rep.
Just because I don't like scumbag warhawks, doesn't make me a liberal. Hell, you and Peolsi are warhawks. Maybe you should start the Warhawks Swampies political party and see how many from both parties join.
Does your brother drink the DNC Koolaide, like you, that Honest Joe is the "good" guy?
OH! So, you can choose to vote non-Republican and still consider yourself a Republican, but if I choose to vote non-Trump, I can no longer be a Republican...
As long as I understand the rules.
As a Fascist, NAZI, Trumpite - I should have expected nothing less.
Aside: Quick question: in the 80's, 90's and 2000's, the Dems all claimed we (Republicans) were the warhawks (or worse, war-mongers!)... now it's our turn? Your warhawk claims against non-Trumpites are historically and factually ignorant.
Finally, as I made clear in my earlier post: my brother is an anarchist. But to clarify for you even more: if Biden was "creating havoc and chaos" and making all the "corrupt politicians pull their hair out", then my brother would be for him. Actually, he (my brother) was quite disappointed in Trump: he thought he'd "sold out" in the end... that Trump had "started being just another corrupt politician" by the end of the 2020 campaign. He (my brother) chose not to vote in 2020 (like he used to do, before 2016). Who knows how many others like him there are...
-
You are a liberal because you worship liberal policies.
As always, you are high as hell on Pelosi's panty fumes.
-
@raphjd said in YouTube suspends Sky News Australia:
You are a liberal because you worship liberal policies.
As always, you are high as hell on Pelosi's panty fumes.
And you are a fascist, nazi trumpite because you think He is all-but-infallible, should rule with absolute authority, and others who disagree should be "canceled" (even jailed!)....
-
Umm, you are the liberal, and we can see that you guys are the fascists.
Hell, even your guy, Honest Joe admitted that he's an authoritarian dictator.
I'll accept being called a Trumpite because there is nothing wrong with that.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login