AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth You're implying that Trump stole the 2016 election or what? You sound like Hillary. Who paid a British agent, who paid a Russian operative, who overheard a story from two guys in a bar. It's just dumb.
Jeeze... you're incapable of intelligent conversation, aren't you...
DEMOCRATS claimed Trump stole the election in 2016. But they were smart enough to realize that after he was sworn in, their only recourse was to impeach him - which they managed to do TWICE!
Trump, and is Trumpster Divers, like yourself, aren't so smart. You seem to think that there is some other MAGICAL way that Trump is going to be put back into office.
Trump is a loser. And a SORE loser at that.
What REALLY remains to be seen is whether he has actually trashed the only REAL asset he had coming into office in 2016: the "Trump Brand"...
-
@bi4smooth Everything you just said is your opinion. "Trump is a loser." Wow. I guess I'm incapable of arguing against your opinion! Wow. That makes you SUPER smart, doesn't it? You didn't insert one fact into all that opinion. You defend the Democrats calling them "smart." "Magical" is another word you use. Who the hell do you think you are? There are no numbers, no factual datas, no nothing. Just "sore loser" and "democrats impeached him" so it's "SORE." What part of that was factual? None of it. It's all your delusional "OPINION." "What remains to be seen is whether he has trashed the Trump Brand." Ok... So what part of what you just said is factual? None of it. Just none.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth Everything you just said is your opinion. "Trump is a loser." Wow. I guess I'm incapable of arguing against your opinion! Wow. That makes you SUPER smart, doesn't it? You didn't insert one fact into all that opinion. You defend the Democrats calling them "smart." "Magical" is another word you use. Who the hell do you think you are? There are no numbers, no factual datas, no nothing. Just "sore loser" and "democrats impeached him" so it's "SORE." What part of that was factual? None of it. It's all your delusional "OPINION." "What remains to be seen is whether he has trashed the Trump Brand." Ok... So what part of what you just said is factual? None of it. Just none.
You truly are illiterate, aren't you...
Sad little man... sad...
For the record: The dems lost in 2016... (fact) and were mad as hell (opinion), because Hillary was supposed to win handily (fact). They were smart only in that they didn't match the lunacy of the Trumpian challenge to the whole electoral process (to Democracy itself!) (fact)...
And the "magical thinking" (opinion) is attributed to the Trumpites, like yourself, who think that Trump will somehow be re-installed as the rightful winner of the 2020 election. That is impossible (fact).
Trump lost in 2020 (fact). Trump is a loser (fact). Trump can't handle the fact that he lost (fact-based, but opinion-based as well). Trump is a sore-loser (opinion).
You're an idiot (opinion) for not being able to gleam this from the posting above (fact).
-
@bi4smooth Nobody cares about your opinion, which you continue to spew. You're not an expert on anything. And what you are claiming as "fact" is contested by over half the country. You are a liberal pretending to be a conservative and it's pathetic.
-
Like your BFF, Stacey Abrams, and the DNC are still claiming that Trump stole the 2016 election, via Russian Collusion and actual voter fraud.
Your extreme TDS makes you a clown that can't be respected. No matter what the evidence shows, you just see "Orange Man Bad" because some liberal ass clowns told you that.
You love Honest Joe and the leg spreader. Honest Joe has spent the last 50 years being a liar, corrupt, a racist, and a homophobe. He's a fake as fuck catholic, as he is anti virtually every one of their core tenets. Even back when GWB was saying "Love the sinner, hate the sin", Honest Joe was hating LGBT people, not just the sin.
You justify voter fraud because it helped your guy win. If Trump won, you'd be screeching for recounts and audits. It's all part of your mental illness.
-
@raphjd said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
Like your BFF, Stacey Abrams, and the DNC are still claiming that Trump stole the 2016 election, via Russian Collusion and actual voter fraud.
Your extreme TDS makes you a clown that can't be respected. No matter what the evidence shows, you just see "Orange Man Bad" because some liberal ass clowns told you that.
You love Honest Joe and the leg spreader. Honest Joe has spent the last 50 years being a liar, corrupt, a racist, and a homophobe. He's a fake as fuck catholic, as he is anti virtually every one of their core tenets. Even back when GWB was saying "Love the sinner, hate the sin", Honest Joe was hating LGBT people, not just the sin.
You justify voter fraud because it helped your guy win. If Trump won, you'd be screeching for recounts and audits. It's all part of your mental illness.
This is not the Straw Man you're looking for...
I did not say Trump stole the 2016 election - I voted for him in 2016!
I said the Dems thought he did... and that they were smarter than the Trumpites, because they turned to legitimate ways to limit his Presidency (I did not agree with them, but one can recognize smart politics while disagreeing with them!)
I only wish I had the powers you attribute to me... But, I am not your Boggart (Harry Potter reference)...
And, for the record, "my guy" didn't win in 2016 or 2020... in both cases, they were eliminated in the primaries... and no, I don't throw temper tantrums when I lose... that is a uniquely Trumpite thing to do...
-
@bi4smooth Oh please. Like Al Gore? Or Stacey Abrams? What exactly makes it uniquely Trumpian? You're just out there in La La Land.
-
AND YET, you can barely make a post without calling Trump and his supporters names.
Your extreme TDS mental illness is quite obvious.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth Oh please. Like Al Gore? Or Stacey Abrams? What exactly makes it uniquely Trumpian? You're just out there in La La Land.
You're an idiot. Not all Trumpites are idiots (I try not to make generalizations like that)... but you? Yup! An Idiot with a capital I...
Al Gore was butt-hurt when he lost - and he complained a lot, but he didn't make claims after the Electoral College vote...
Stacy Abrams was butt-hurt when she lost - and given that her opponent was actually the Secretary of State at the time (and didn't recuse himself), she may have actually had a point... but she didn't make claims after the election results were certified...
Trump was butt-hurt when he lost... but he, in his unique "sore-loser" way, still - to this day - wants to make claims about the results. THAT is where he is unique....
That you can't see that is a testament to your extremist views and complete lack of intellectual competency.
-
@bi4smooth Yea well that's because of the monumental number of dead people who voted. For starters. The idea that there were more ballots than voters in NY, which has strict voting laws. And honestly you have no place making declarations about it. The audit will count all the 20s, 50s, and 100s in the drawer. And you're claiming Trump is just a loser and insinuating that the audit isn't justified is bullshit. The audit is justified because that's what the people demand. We know there was fraud, and we DO NOT Trust the election system for good reason.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth Yea well that's because of the monumental number of dead people who voted. For starters. The idea that there were more ballots than voters in NY, which has strict voting laws. And honestly you have no place making declarations about it. The audit will count all the 20s, 50s, and 100s in the drawer. And you're claiming Trump is just a loser and insinuating that the audit isn't justified is bullshit. The audit is justified because that's what the people demand. We know there was fraud, and we DO NOT Trust the election system for good reason.
I'm saying that when the "auditor" shows up and says "I'm going to audit your books and prove you defrauded people" that is no audit... that's a prosecution.
Your analogy to a bank audit is flawed because they don't audit banks by counting the cash - and nothing else! This is more like an IRS audit - where the IRS shows up and seizes everything and spends years trying to PROVE you lied... Kinda like they're trying to do to Trump right now (and it's unfair to HIM ... yup, that's right, I take HIS side in that one!)
-
@bi4smooth You're stupid.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth You're stupid.
I'll play...
I know you are, but what am I?
Nanny nanny boo boo, you can't catch me!
Got any other childish games we can play? I raised 9 kids (ok, I'm not done with the youngest yet - but he's 15 - I'm almost there!)... I know LOTS of childish games....
I know! Let's play HIDE & SEEK! You go hide, I'll look for you... no posting until I find you!
-
Not to mention that you are a liberal, so your brain hasn't developed yet.
-
@bi4smooth No, let's just start with ONE thing. High Pollution, in all the Democrat Run Cities.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth No, let's just start with ONE thing. High Pollution, in all the Democrat Run Cities.
And there is far more manure in Republican-led States!
High pollution goes hand-in-hand with high population!
Is it a problem? YES (in all 3 cases: to much pollution, too much manure, and too many people!)... is it because the leadership is Democrat? There's no way to tell! There is no comparison to make!
-
@bi4smooth No, it's a common theme among all the cities that have high pollution: They are ALL run by DEMOCRATS. Period. That's the common thread. Stop trying to weave a story about how Republicans MIGHT be responsible. It's dumb.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth No, it's a common theme among all the cities that have high pollution: They are ALL run by DEMOCRATS. Period. That's the common thread. Stop trying to weave a story about how Republicans MIGHT be responsible. It's dumb.
Answered in another thread (your inability to keep multiple lines of thought open at once is truly telling.... in a very unflattering way for you!
Maybe let's get back to the thread here: that an AZ lawmaker threatening the US Atty General is absurd?
-
@bi4smooth You are ridiculous. You think that the federal government has the right to usurp State's rights? You don't know what you're talking about. You ignore that all your beloved cities have the highest pollution and crime and worst education scores. You can't answer that. You just give crap excuses. Every liberal run city is on the BOTTOM, and that's a fact. They have the worst in everything and everyone knows it. You defending the obvious exposes you.
-
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth You are ridiculous. You think that the federal government has the right to usurp State's rights? You don't know what you're talking about. You ignore that all your beloved cities have the highest pollution and crime and worst education scores. You can't answer that. You just give crap excuses. Every liberal run city is on the BOTTOM, and that's a fact. They have the worst in everything and everyone knows it. You defending the obvious exposes you.
You think a State Legislator (part-time, mind you) can "have someone arrested"?
He was making an empty threat against a fake circumstance!
Garland never suggested he would come to AZ and interfere with the elections there... and if he did want to go do something there, it would have to be under Federal Law (which doesn't exist WRT counting votes), and he would have to have a Federal Court Order - to do anything!
To think otherwise is to fail to know even the basics about our Criminal Justice System - state OR federal!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login