• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Proof you can't trust wikipedia - factual errors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Chit Chat
    6 Posts 4 Posters 393 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjdR Online
      raphjd Forum Administrator
      last edited by

      Due to the recent election, I looked up some stuff on wikipedia.  This is more proof that they are wrong and can't be trusted.

      Look at the pages of Joe Kennedy III and Patrick Kennedy.  They can't both be true since only 1 of them can be the last Kennedy in public office.

      Joe III is still technically in Congress until the new Congress is sworn in Jan 2021.  Patrick left Congress in 2011 due to being unable to cope with being bi-polar and being in Congress.

      Joe's page is correct and Patrick's page is wrong.

      There are many more examples of factual errors on Wikipedia, without even getting into political biases.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • andergarciaA Offline
        andergarcia
        last edited by

        Yes, I have noticed that, too. In general, Wikipedia is very good to get instant information about something, but I agree that we need to be very careful with the information we are sometimes getting there. We should always double check the information from Wikipedia with other sources.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          fun17
          last edited by

          @andergarcia:

          Yes, I have noticed that, too. In general, Wikipedia is very good to get instant information about something, but I agree that we need to be very careful with the information we are sometimes getting there. We should always double check the information from Wikipedia with other sources.

          Second..  🙂

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GrotomodeG Offline
            Grotomode
            last edited by

            Of course. No one should ever trust Wikipedia in itself.
            It is just a good starting point to find other references.
            But definitely a minefield when it comes to any page that relates to politics.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • raphjdR Online
              raphjd Forum Administrator
              last edited by

              @Grotomode:

              Of course. No one should ever trust Wikipedia in itself.
              It is just a good starting point to find other references.
              But definitely a minefield when it comes to any page that relates to politics.

              It doesn't even have to be about politics, Wikipedia is full of factual errors.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GrotomodeG Offline
                Grotomode
                last edited by

                Yeah I am just saying that especially when an article is even remotely related to politics its a complete no go.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post