• Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    • Login

    Definition of Fascism

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Politics & Debate
    102 Posts 17 Posters 18.6k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      heartfellII
      last edited by

      @raphjd:

      You prefer that definition because it suits your agenda.

      You ignore that fascists use violence to get their way.   We see antifa do this.  The bike lockk professor smashed at least 11 people over the head with his bike lock.  They set an occupied building on fire, as we saw at Berkely.   There's the guy that has a habit of trying to push women in front of moving buses and kicking women because they are anti abortion.  There are countless examples of violence by the left.

      Liberalism, in the modern era, has nothing to do with freedom and individual recognition, whatever that is supposed to mean.  Modern liberalism is nothing more than idiots that think they can do whatever they want, to whomever they want, because they were offended.

      The more I see of antifa and lefties, the more I support "stand your ground" laws.

      You crack me up with your comments about ideology, then you spew your leftie ideology.

      I view modern liberalism as a cancer.

      Why would you need to do virulent statement to argue ? The main problem here is hatred, you have your own ideology which I probably ignore the subtlety because I do not know you. However, whatever political party you do support, nationalism is not patriotism and the men like Trumps are not getting caught by a conspiration but caught because he never cared about the laws and it's own people plus he is a racist and a xenophobe. So unless you are which I hope this is untrue, don't shape your ideology as it's convenient for you, bashing everyone who disagree with you or calling them "leftie". That's not because you are a high moderator, administrator or even been the owner of this website that you are allowed to act in such a way and being mean to every people who are legitimate to criticize your statements. This is the beauty of democracy which many government do not respect anymore. You have a voice, I have one, let's respect each other please.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E Offline
        eobox91103
        last edited by

        I remember a college professor of mine saying that you can't use logic in discussion with someone who doesn't use logic to form their own viewpoint.

        If that's true (which I believe is the case), this thread has exhausted itself.  It's time to move along, folks…there's nothing to see here.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • raphjdR Online
          raphjd Forum Administrator
          last edited by

          Instead of countering my points, you have to call me names.  That proves you know Im right.

          The only difference between 1930s and modern fascists is the pathetic need to hide your faces now.    At least the 1930s fascists had the courage of their convictions to show their faces, rather than being sniveling losers.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            heartfellII
            last edited by

            @raphjd:

            At least the 1930s fascists had the courage of their convictions to show their faces, rather than being sniveling losers.

            Are you talking about yourself ?
            They did not have any courage, IN ANY SORTS, facism has exterminated millions of human beings for the only reason they were jews, homoxexuals, communist, and everyone else who was fighting against him. I can't believe I just read this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • raphjdR Online
              raphjd Forum Administrator
              last edited by

              Umm, fascism didn't kill jews as that was the wrong country.   The National Socialists (sound familiar) of Germany killed them.

              Modern fascism is what we see from antifa and liberals.   They set an occupied building on fire because they didn't want someone to give a talk.  A professor smashed at least 11 people over the head with his bike lock.  They attacked an older driver because he didn't bow and scrape to them when they decided to shut down the city.   Antifa has used violence to get their way.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H Offline
                herbert967
                last edited by

                @raphjd:

                Are you conflating the use of violence to get you way as wanting a better country?

                If so, then YOU ARE A FASCIST.

                You are no different than the Fascists of the 1930s.

                Also, listen to the language of the left.  It's clear they hate the west, but they won't leave and move to their non-white utopias that they love so much.

                So all the people on the right that want war? or believe in war?  or glorify war?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • raphjdR Online
                  raphjd Forum Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Actually, if you look, it's the Democrats that are the current war mongers.  They are butt hurt that Trump isn't attacking everyone in sight.

                  Then again, they want the opposite of Trump, even it it's one of their long standing platforms like ending illegal immigration.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    Matie
                    last edited by

                    @tt4079:

                    @raphjd:

                    There's a huge difference between western leftists and other leftists.

                    Western leftists hate their country, whiteness and everything else associated with the west.    Of course, it's no surprise when you ask a western leftist what country is better than a western country, they can't answer it.

                    Non-western leftist focus on more on communism/socialism, while western leftists focus on dictatorial governments.

                    You crack me up mate. I mean really crack me up. Some of your posts are the funniest ever. Western leftists hate their country!!!! LOL Many of your posts are full of sweeping statements making accusations at any side you don't agree with using quite aggressive language that I guess only forum police get away with.

                    Seriously though mate, going by your posts you need to calm down a tad. Your blood pressure must be sky high. Never heard anyone sound so continuously angry.

                    All the best
                    xx

                    Western leftists not only hate their countries, but hate their own gender, country and ethnicity.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      Matie
                      last edited by

                      @raphjd:

                      Actually, if you look, it's the Democrats that are the current war mongers.   They are butt hurt that Trump isn't attacking everyone in sight.

                      Then again, they want the opposite of Trump, even it it's one of their long standing platforms like ending illegal immigration.

                      I wouldn't say Trump is all that doveish, overall, but it is a fact that the hard left are clamouring for bloody war against Syria, which would virtually plunge the world knee deep in blood and a World War.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        scratcher71
                        last edited by

                        There were alot of fascist movements before the 2000s, mostly during the 20th century, and lord were they awful. Where I come from, there were all these smaller governments/individuals trying to gain power, and it fucked the country up.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • raphjdR Online
                          raphjd Forum Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Previously fascists admitted they are fascists and had the courage to show their faces.

                          Now the fascists pretend to be anti-fascists and hide their faces.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J Offline
                            jbfpapar2
                            last edited by

                            So why being antifascist is terrorism for Trump and republicans?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ManHandlerM Offline
                              ManHandler
                              last edited by

                              @jbfpapar2:

                              So why being antifascist is terrorism for Trump and republicans?

                              That's a dumb question. Antifa is not Antifascist. There are many words used to portray something, which actually mean the opposite. I'm sure you've come across such words in your life. "Fas" is the root word for "God's Law." Meaning the Axe is God. In the Congress, right behind speaker Pelosi are two 9 foot tall "fascis." It's the symbol for a bundle of birch rods tied together with a hatchet head. Fascist symbols are right in front of your face. "Jus" is the root word for Man's Law. Justice. We have a bit of a paradox. How can you have Justice with Fascism ever so present and in your face and you don't even see it? That's to answer the title of this subject, "Definition of Fascism." It's in contradistinction to Man's Law, the Constitution.

                              So to answer your question about "antifascist" (Antifa) being designated as a terrorist organization. It's self-evident.

                              And to add a point to other comments made on this thread in regard to Proud Boys… There leader is a black hispanic guy, so why would a bunch of white supremacists join an organization led by a black guy? Because they're military, and in the armed forces, those are your brothers. They are chauvanists, but being white supremacist is ridiculous. You can't just throw around the race card anymore. Listen to both sides, listen to their leader, and be a good judge. Justice is only served when you listen to both sides. None of you have listened to what their black hispanic leader has to say, and therefore, I say you're leaning more towards fascism, because you're only listening to one side. They don't tolerate racism or sexual orientation discrimination. I don't see any reason to believe they've raped, murdered, called someone the N word... anything. Do you got something? Maybe a video of one of their members using the N word...?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • raphjdR Online
                                raphjd Forum Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Fascist of the 1930s and the last 20 years are exactly the same, except modern fascists hide their faces.

                                Both use(d) the exact same tactics and reasons for their actions, with a slight twist in the exact words.

                                Look at 1930s photos of fascists in action, then compare them to antifa and BLM in action.  It's shocking how they are almost exactly the same.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ManHandlerM Offline
                                  ManHandler
                                  last edited by

                                  I'll also add that Trump designated both Antifa AND the KKK as terrorist organizations. They're terrorist organizations because they terrorize people. You can't look at the videos of Antifa and say they aren't violent. They're burning buildings with people inside (including CNN's HQ in Atlanta). They're assaulting people daily. They're murdering people who see things differently. They're looting small businesses (many owned by black people in their own community). They're torturing people (like the guy who was tied up for days). They're destroying businesses, government buildings, and churches. They're destroying vehicles and homes (rights are derived from property) and even in Austin they burned a homeless man's bed who happened to live where they met under a bridge downtown. They're rioting and blocking commerce (traffic). They do not respect people's rights, and they are not peaceful. End of discussion. Anyone claiming otherwise is just coocoo. The idea that you don't get it… when it's self evident shows that you are very low IQ.  It's a dumb question.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ManHandlerM Offline
                                    ManHandler
                                    last edited by

                                    Oh yes, and I think that of the 37 cities where the rioting is going on, 34 are in proximity to important federal government property. They're getting rid of the property owners in patterns, in opportunity zones, on certain streets. Catherine Austin Fits goes into that, showing maps. Look her up, but not on Google.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • GrotomodeG Offline
                                      Grotomode
                                      last edited by

                                      LOL at this thread… it always cracks me up when people with no reading comprehension bring up definitions to formulate an "argument".

                                      Btw how can someone be a moderator of the boards and create threads that do not welcome any discussion but are flat out inflammatory?

                                      It is the equivalent of a left-leaning moderator creating a thread just to state that the right in general is made up of racist, misogynist, god-fearing lunatics.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • raphjdR Online
                                        raphjd Forum Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Once again, a liberal who can't point out how I am wrong.

                                        Also, there's plenty of discussions here, which is why there are 3 pages.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C Offline
                                          Calatar
                                          last edited by

                                          @raphjd:

                                          Umm, fascism didn't kill jews as that was the wrong country.   The National Socialists (sound familiar) of Germany killed them.

                                          Modern fascism is what we see from antifa and liberals.   They set an occupied building on fire because they didn't want someone to give a talk.  A professor smashed at least 11 people over the head with his bike lock.  They attacked an older driver because he didn't bow and scrape to them when they decided to shut down the city.   Antifa has used violence to get their way.

                                          This is a common misunderstanding from those who didn’t study the history of the rise of the Nazi party.

                                          It was labelled a socialist party in name… but it was not one in action or creed. It was a right-wing party. Always was. But you really have to have looked into it more than just looking at the name to know this - or examine what they did (which were all typically right-wing actions).

                                          This sort of thing gets confusing as people on the extremes (far right or far left) are often very similar in action, but different in creed. They do the same things all the time - but claim it’s for a different reason.

                                          And liberal or conservative - is another misnomer. In the U.K. you have liberal conservatives - and they are the most right-wing. In the USA, you conflate liberal with left-wing. It’s really no where near this simple - and trying to discuss it in this way makes it meaningless. So it’s pointless - and I would encourage you to desist.

                                          Also, if you really want people to come here and debate you guys, then you’ll need to be more open to having that debate. Atm, you’re not. It’s clear that’s the case from reading only a few of the most interacted with posts. Indeed, you’ll say now that this is a dig at you (an ad hominem attack) - but it’s not. I’m not attacking you to disprove your argument - I’m explaining why people don’t bother to come here or bother with you. If you truly want that to change, then you need to first change the only thing you can: yourself. Until then, most people (even if they could prove you wrong over and over again) simply won’t bother. You’re not worth their time.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • GrotomodeG Offline
                                            Grotomode
                                            last edited by

                                            @raphjd:

                                            Once again, a liberal who can't point out how I am wrong.

                                            Also, there's plenty of discussions here, which is why there are 3 pages.

                                            Learn how to use a dictionary first.

                                            Its funny though that you accuse me (and others in this thread) of not being able to refute your claim and just name-call you while your OP is exactly that: name calling. 😉

                                            I've been in plenty of forums where political discussion thrives much more than the 3 pages you are happy about (mind you, its 3 pages in the span of 2 years, man).

                                            It does not change the fact that most of your comments on anything political is an aggressive generalizing rant against whatever you define as "the left".

                                            Pretty much the bottom of the barrel when it comes to political discussions.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 3 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post