College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
-
Do you lot ever give up
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
NOPE. I only ever see Americans on the internet or TV, so they must not exist in real life. It's the same thing you say about SJWs.
Umm, how f'ing lazy are you?
It's stuff like this that proves you either have absolutely no clue what is going on in the world or you live in an echo chamber.
Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn spoke at the UN. That info isn't that hard to find out, nor is it hard to find video of them speaking there.
UN Women isn't a secret organization. It's easy to find stuff from them. Notice in your search that there is no UN Men, because well gender equality.
Jessica Valenti is a "journalist" and not hard to find info about.
The US Department of Labor and the FBI crime stats prove the gender wage gap and feminist rape stats are lies.
The fact that you don't know about any of this shows you are either extremely clueless or you agree with them so it just blows by you without you noticing.
So, when talking about college safe spaces, we can't talk about SJWs. Is that what you are saying?! It does fit with your attempts to remove SJWs from the real world.
Ok, lets talk about that Professor.
She said that half of voting Americans committed TERRORISM and ASSAULT on the US, because they voted for someone she doesn't like. Her anti-Trump rant had nothing to do with the coursework she was lecturing about.
There isn't a lawsuit, just a complaint to the head of the college.
Ironically, Rob Schneiderman, president of the Coast Federation of Educators/American Federation of Teachers Local 1911 that represents Cox, said he wanted to make it so professors and STUDENTS can have free speech on campus. So that is the opposite of college "safe spaces".
The funny thing is, this article doesn't mention any of the cases where conservative Professors get in trouble for things they say; like the one who said he was against abortion but it's legal, in a lecture about how personal morals and the law don't always match.
Lets not gloss over the fact that the article is quite biased to the hard left.
-
Do you lot ever give up
Are you still here whining about a topic you claim you aren't interested in?
BTW, when you report me, you report me to me. DUH!!!! The fact that you have only been targeting me, shows you are an SJW who can't stand up to his convictions. Instead of insisting we shut down topics you don't like, just ignore them.
-
Claremont McKenna College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
-
That's why Trump got elected.
-
So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
But Spintendo…that's not the real problem, the problem is that this so called 'safe spaces' can be used as nests to hatch hate propaganda. We are talking about minorities (race, sex) that are claiming spaces to be free of white people (or basically any other person who doesn't cater to their exclusive group demographic) because they see them as an enemy (which ironically has pandered to them so much that they're are actually able to this this kind of crazy things. Let the hate speech pump them to the point were they will enact it outside of their 'safe space'.
Even worse we talk about those spaces funded by colleges with the money of ALL contributors (all the sexes , all the races).
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
NOPE. I only ever see Americans on the internet or TV, so they must not exist in real life. It's the same thing you say about SJWs.
Umm, how f'ing lazy are you?
No isn't the same thing. A country of people =/= SJWs. Are you serious?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"A common way for this fallacy to be perpetuated is one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence doesn't bear because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: "If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal". d is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be able to be used."
-
Who cares? Whites have had a safe space in this country for 240 years…
-
I don't see the issue.
-
I don't see the issue.
The issue is that minorities are actually advocating for segregation. The same thing they battled to get rid off. And by some sort of twisted logic, they don't see it as segregation.
Who cares? Whites have had a safe space in this country for 240 years…
And some of them rallied with the black, asian, native and latino people in order to all share a space, a safe space called a 'country'. But now, these same minorities want to shut the whites out, allegedly on their need to be 'safe' from them. In this times of political correctness they are being pandered to and basically being pampered by the same 'whites' they so claim they need protection from. On the other side if cisgender, male white people where to ask for the same 'safe spaces' they would be immediately labeled as racists, chauvinists and neanderthals.
And believe me, it goes first against the biggest group (whites in the USA case) but then it deviates into hating anyone not like you. Blacks hating on latinos, latinos hating on asians, asians hating on blacks and so forth. (And I'm just using races here, add sexual orientations/identities, even religions… and it just turns into a mess)
-
I do ignore the content but I still have to scroll through all the crap to see any interesting posts from decent members
Umm, there are aren't that many of these topics.
And who the hell do you think you are to judge who is "decent" or not?!
-
No isn't the same thing. A country of people =/= SJWs. Are you serious?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"A common way for this fallacy to be perpetuated is one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence doesn't bear because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: "If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal". d is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be able to be used."
"I only ever see SJWs on the internet so they must not exist"
vs
"I only see Americans on the Internet so they must not exist".
Both are the same, except for the subject.
We both know that both groups exist because how else would they be on the internet and in news articles.
-
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
Ok, so I'm sure you would be fine with an equal number of locations that only white students could go right?
-
Claremont McKenna College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
Imagine the outrage if anyone even attempted to get a White only student group on campus. It would be called racist by the other single race student groups. You know, racial equality and all that.
-
No isn't the same thing. A country of people =/= SJWs. Are you serious?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"A common way for this fallacy to be perpetuated is one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence doesn't bear because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: "If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal". d is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be able to be used."
"I only ever see SJWs on the internet so they must not exist"
vs
"I only see Americans on the Internet so they must not exist".
Both are the same, except for the subject.
We both know that both groups exist because how else would they be on the internet and in news articles.
I HAVE NEVER SAID SJWS DON'T EXIST. WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING THAT? THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M SAYING!
-
Vocal Minority? To be honest, the only time I EVER hear about SJWs is when other people on the internet complain about them.
That is what you said.
Where in that statement do yo admit they exist? Nowhere.
You want people to think SJWs only exist in the minds of those that complain about them.
-
Sjws are the worst happening of the century. This is literally eugenics.
-
I see nothing wrong with it. There needs to be spaces where we don't have to worry about people saying/doing stupid crap just because they don't understand and/or don't want to understand anything about our culture. White students wore blackface (something used to negatively impact black intellect and black identity) at quite a few parties when I was in college and said problematic crap all the time about black students, but being a part of multiple black student groups on-campus made me feel better about having to go to school with such racist disgusting people who only wanted to mock my blackness and insult me and people like me. It's either create spaces for us to avoid people who mock and harass us constantly or we'll be forced to protect ourselves. I shouldn't have to see you wear blackface at a public institution where I have to pay tuition at just like you. How is that fair? And if one more white person touches my hair without permission, I'm taking it as assault and you're getting punched. This is why we need safe spaces, we have no right to our own bodies anymore.
-
As someone who is black, I think it's sad that theres people who see nothing wrong with this.
And I have no idea where the above person went to school that white people apparently treat him like a circus monkey, but I haven't known anyone to do that.In any case, I don't care what kind of discrimination you think you're facing. It's nothing compared to what it was 60 years ago and they didn't have "Safe spaces" back then. All this does is promote minorities to staying in their own little bubble, which is only gonna hurt them in the long run when they realize to obtain any kind of success in the real world they're going to have to step out of it eventually. Not going to get very far in this country without interacting with white people.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login