@Eridanos: It's obvious Bill is a tool for Hillary's never ending search for power. Here in Mexico, we never knew of the other sexual scandals of Clinton, we only knew the Lewinsly affair. But still, after that, we thought Hillary would divorce Bill, specially when she started going by Hillary Rodham. But then she went by Hillary Rodham-Clinton and now she's just Hillary Clinton again.  I feel she just wants Bill's family money and connections to suit her own interests. Are the Rodhams an affluent family in the USA, both politically and financially? No, and the Rodhams are dead.  Hillary doesn't even live in the same house as Bill, she lives in the house next door to him.  Bill has been her lifelong stepping stone.  It's funny that Hillary has not accomplished anything other than disasters in her entire life.  There is very strong evidence that her daughter Chelsea is not the daughter of Bill, but rather of very wealthy Webb Hubbell.    Sure doesn't look a bit like Billy! http://blackbag.gawker.com/is-this-chelsea-clintons-real-father-1780376180 A prominent TV host nearly got arrested just for offering to pay for a strand of Chelsea Clinton's hair for DNA testing.

@raphjd: As a side, but based on our post, there's the old saying that the rich get rich by being cheap. I used to manage some semi high end restaurants in Chicago and the more money they had, the less they tipped and they usually got their food comped. ++++ In the west, where we are supposed to have "justice" systems, women constantly get away with making false claims against men.     In the UK, it's rare for a proven false claimer (rape, domestic abuse, or whatever) to be prosecuted.    The same in all of the west. In Europe, it's common for the accused's name and photo to become public immediately and to hide the victim's identity.     Even when it's completely proven the "victim" lied, it's extremely rare that her name is ever released. I would never hire anybody that I could not fire.  That is why it is a terrible idea to hire family members, minorities, or women.  Is that fair to them?  No.. but is it fair to the employer to wind up being stuck with someone they can't get rid of?  No.    All those protections wind up backfiring on the people they are supposed to protect.

@raphjd: Twitter has de-verified anyone guilty of wrong think. It has nothing to do with violating their rules.    The only thing required is for you to be what Hillary called a "deplorable" in the eyes of Twitter. You can spew hatred of whites and men because Twitter loves people like that.   HOWEVER, don't you dare even think about disagreeing with a feminist or SJW of any type. I rarely use Twitter, but I've noticed that they block accounts and delete posts. I wonder why. Seems to me that a social media site should not be censoring anybody.  If someone posted something like kiddie porn or death threats, or other illegal things, they should turn the poster in to the police or FBI.  I don't like the concept of being punished when I didn't do anything against the law.  When I point out what a monstrous bitch Crooked Hillary is, I don't expect to have my account terminated.    Ironically, it's OK to threaten to kill the president these days.  Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Pooper Scooper Dogg Shit, Johnny Depp, and many others have blatantly advocated that Trump be killed.  Throw them all in jail.  Terminate THEIR social media accounts.

Maybe, but this was flatly denied by the EU and Remainers before the Brexit vote.  They said it was just scare tactics by the Leavers. Also, where did it come from?  Other people i talk to from the EU didn't hear anything about it until the articles came out saying it happened.

Well, mainstream media is fake news anyway. They won't shut up about Dylann Roof, but the never mention the black guy who shot up the white church.  They have an anti-white male narrative and they won't budge from it.

Obama campaigned to reverse the GWB era crap, but massively expanded. Snowden outed him and that's why Snowden is a "criminal". Remember, Obama also promised to protect whistle-blowers.  I guess he forgot to say "except those that out me as a liar".

Death-row is a specific part of the prison that they are sent to when their execution date nears.

While the young men of UCLA were reading scripts prepared by some attorney or PR firm, they did seem contrite, as well they should be. [Back then, I recall Vick making the media rounds, and besides his poor enunciation, he struck me as having the most sullen delivery and complete lack of authenticity of any "sports mea culpa" in my memory.] So, I would like to see the trio sit out about 10 games, which is not that bad for UCLA's basketball program, as those are mostly out-of-conference, warm-up games against smaller schools. Under Coats, Looting Accessories

Saw this and thought of you. [image: 1781654035454-01ad9baa8b60.jpg] [image: 105209_f4Afyuq.jpg]

It's difficult to blame Carter, since it was a legal contract, that he wasn't part of. Nixon is responsible for the culture of sending our jobs to China.    Well, he and Reagan.    Nixon opened the door and Reagan paid companies to move their factories out of the US.    Until Reagan,  businesses were punished for taking their factories out of the US.

Lesbians only became a thing with Bill Clinton's Don't Ask, Don't Tell.  Prior to that it wasn't an issue and as far as I know it wasn't a "crime" like being gay. ++++ If a woman gets pregnant, she's treated like someone who broke their leg or some other serious injury that makes them unable to fulfill all of their duties. Oddly, if a guy admits to purposely breaking his leg to avoid duty and a girl admits to purposely getting pregnant to avoid duty, only one will get thrown out with a dishonorable discharge.    For the clueless, it ain't the one with the vag.

@raphjd: The BBC is pretty SJW.   Name any SJW talking point and they report it as fact.    They de-muslim stories whenever they can. I very rarely watch the BBC.. but they seem to be fair with Trump. I'm sure they give muslims a free pass since muslims are so powerful in England.  Even the mayor of London is muslim.. and hates Trump.

@cteavin: @Frederick: You have 5 dots…  but I was replying to DENE - who has but one.   One dot does not make a person bad. But five does, eh? (lol) Well, 1 is barely anything. 5 is not much.. but is a sign that there is a problem.   When someone has 12 red dots (which is the maximum visible) THAT means the poster is a psycho moonbat.  When someone has 12 red dots, bring out the straight jackets! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp3_flfc54Q&feature=youtu.be&t=134 Check out the original.. which got over 18 MILLION views! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP9Wp6QVbsk

@raphjd: @flozen: @raphjd: If you look at my down votes, you will see the same 6 people (only shows the top 6) for Fred.   Someone, I won't mention Flozen's name (oops, that just slipped out),  in this thread is in my top 6 down voters. I'm glad you noticed.  I assign Thumbs Down for a variety of reasons, but chief among them are: Potty mouth Absence or weakness of citations Intentional leading of threads off-topic as a diversion when "losing" Inability or unwillingness to evaluate new facts presented by others Well, the list could go on and on. LOL. Why did you leave out "not worshiping feminism and all it's religious dogma"? Anyway, it says volumes that you are up there with Suitieday, Wafflez, DrWas and the other rancid SJWs who would follow me around and proudly down vote me for filling porn requests or helping people in the support section. I used to fill a lot of porn requests too!  I guess no good deed goes unpunished.

That is some serious mental gymnastics to justify Marion Barry and Susan B Anthony being praised, while others are demonized.

Just looked and only the main and the "ghetto" accounts were used to attack me. The 3rd account was used to post rubbish in other parts of the forums.

@raphjd: The problem is, the identity politics is coming from one side; the LEFT. It would be "racist" if it was the other way around, but of course the left never, ever believe that whites can be the victim of racism even when it clearly meets the made up definition leftists used so that only whites could be racists.  The same goes for sexism. Imagine the shit storm if it was 3 white men and a VOC, "at the eleventh hour", decided to run and people started to tell her she couldn't run because she isn't white and has a vag.      If it was reversed, it would be international news, not just local news that happened to make it to YouTube. Don Lemon and Simone Sanders would be screaming "OH HELL FUCKING NO!!!  CRACKERS NEED TO FUCKING DIE!!!!   WE TOLD YOU ALL HONKEYS ARE RACISTS!!!". Here's the thing, R: We agree. Flozen even agreed that this particular case seeped in identity politics but instead of standing on that firm ground you both got into a fight. Not cool! About this particular case there are two things going on. Identity politics and 2) the man is legit less qualified. If you're going to maintain that he x, y, or z because he's a white guy, then you're playing identity politics, now. The conversation could have moved in a direction to find more common ground or to look for solutions but things here quickly degenerate into name-calling and fisty cuffs. As an Admin you should be setting the standard so that conversations flow. This is why I'm pissed with you but ignore Fred (most of the time). Most of my friends hold views I disagree with – Christians, Muslims, SJW's of some flavor, real racists -- and I get along fine because I listen and talk. There needs to be more of that here.